Jump to content

Article 270 versus national government


rooster59

Recommended Posts

Article 270 versus national government

 

Piboon.jpg

 

Over the past few days, calls for a “national government” have grown, but so are a group of constitutional interpreters who believe that writers of Thailand’s new charter had anticipated problems of a “minority” administration and thus sneaked in ways to tackle them.

 

The constitutional interpreters are pointing at Article 270 of the charter which states that laws associated with “national reform” have to be provisionally passed by a joint House-Senate deliberation.

 

It’s the same provisional authority as the Senate’s power to vote alongside the House of Representatives on the selection of the first post-election prime minister. The powers were given to the first Senate virtually installed by the military.

 

Full story: https://www.thaipbsworld.com/article-270-versus-national-government/

 

thaipbs.jpg

-- © Copyright Thai PBS 2019-04-20

Link to comment
Share on other sites

     Thais must of seen the new constitution as a total falacy when it was drafted by the Military, and in every way was anti Thai for the Thai people, I can't believe the stupidity of the Junta getting a single vote in the earlier Election. So, are Thais really that stupid, or the EC that crooked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...