Jump to content

Authorities must protect activists from vicious thugs


webfact

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, geoffbezoz said:

If you care to read the posts correctly the context was within writing themselves an amnesty against crimes committed. Exactly what the earlier poster has said regarding the Junta.

And the crimes are nowhere near of the same proportion.

 

4 hours ago, Eric Loh said:

I am glad the junta found those bombers. Mostly linked to the south insurgency like the Big C and Ramkhamheang bombings although the Erawan and the spate of bombs in few south provinces are still stalled. Well the Trat alleged bombers were released. So really a mixed bag which include the Hospital bombing conviction by someone who just dislike the military and wanted to make a statement. Anyone I left? 

 

The junta intimidation does sink to pretty low level with those ending up in Mekong or dead in the cells or extra judiciary kidnapping and those attitude adjustments. They are unlike elected governments as they wrote themselves amnesty for all crimes committed. 

Elected governments would never write themselves an amnesty for all crimes committed, and include a few mates and family members, would they?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ozman52 said:

And the crimes are nowhere near of the same proportion.

 

Elected governments would never write themselves an amnesty for all crimes committed, and include a few mates and family members, would they?

Well we are not talking of elected governments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Ozman52 said:

Elected governments would never write themselves an amnesty for all crimes committed, and include a few mates and family members, would they?

Only one amnesty went through the legislative process without any blotches. That junta amnesty is all encompassing too to give the coupsters full protection. 

By the way, that amnesty bill also provided for the yellow shirts, their leaders and Ahbisit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

Only one amnesty went through the legislative process without any blotches. That junta amnesty is all encompassing too to give the coupsters full protection. 

By the way, that amnesty bill also provided for the yellow shirts, their leaders and Ahbisit. 

Oh it never got through, so we should all forget the stench of the PTP amnesty bill, the changes to the legislation, the 4:25 am parliament session, and the call to BKK  of red thugs to stifle dissent? You wish.

BTW we all know who 9 years of amnesty was meant to relieve of the many crimes he committed, not to mention the ones being committed at the time.

Edited by Ozman52
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Ozman52 said:

Oh it never got through, so we should all forget the stench of the PTP amnesty bill, the changes to the legislation, the 4:25 am parliament session, and the call to BKK  of red thugs to stifle dissent? You wish.

BTW we all know who 9 years of amnesty was meant to relieve of the many crimes he committed, not to mention the ones being committed at the time.

The stench of the PTP amnesty did not reach the level of the junta amnesty. One didn;t happen while the other did. Can't see the difference? What about the 4.25 parliament session. The Dems were invited and they refused. Only red thugs? You myopic or what. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...