sensei Posted March 19, 2007 Share Posted March 19, 2007 You can't get the top toolbar to reduce as much as IE. BADFirefox icons are bigger -- take up more space. BAD Firefox cannot save web pages as single .mht archive files -- this is the clincher. BAD You can get all Firefox files saved automatically to desktop instead of stupid locations like My Documents with IE. GOOD The Bookmark feature works a bit better with Firefox in the ability to move them around. GOOD As for extensions and plug-ins ... what do these have to do with the browser? I have to download Skype just the same if I want to use it, and there will be an icon on the lower-right desktop taskbar to start it up. Overall, not much to choose between. For a simpleton like myself IE6 looks and works marginally better, but thanks to all for your comments. Firefox is highly customizable. The size of the icons can be reduced by simply ticking a small box as shown in the picture. You can also tell Firefox where to save your downloads: Tools => Options => Main tab => Downloads. Skype in Firefox? Yeah, heard about it. But seriously, how many people would really want to place call from a web browser? There are sooooooo many god things about Firefox. It's safe and secure. My favorite is that Firefox looks gooooooood. IE looks whiter than my grandfather's dentures. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ignis Posted March 19, 2007 Share Posted March 19, 2007 Myself Firefox is soooooooo much better. I have configured it how I like it and correctly, + customized to my taste, and I think Firefox is the superior browser both in speed and ease of use. If you like I.E. you can download the XP or the new Vista skin...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firefoxx Posted March 19, 2007 Share Posted March 19, 2007 Like I said before, Firefox's big feature (simplicity) is also it's biggest fault (no features). A lot of the "BAD" that Trevor mentions can be rectified with add-ins and extensions. It's just that a lot of people, like him, don't want/care/bother to search for and install those extensions. If it's not already there, then it's never going to be there since these people don't install these add-ons. For me, just finding the stupid sessionsaver extension and installing it was already troublesome, and I'm fairly computer-savvy (an understatement). As said before, once a mind's made up, it's made up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kayo Posted March 23, 2007 Share Posted March 23, 2007 but Antivir is also free and has been outperforming even most of the paid AVs lately. Just when you convinced me to go with Avast, now I've got to change again. 555555555555! Yup.. ditto! As to the O.P, my answer is the same as many others, but I am a convert and have converted many around me to using firefox. Within a day or two, everybody I know has been converted, and starts to spread the word themselves. *same with avast btw cdnvic, cheers for that* Re> firefox memory hog. Allai na, khrap? I don't know what the problem with your PC is, but it ain't firefox/thunderbird that's running your cpu at 100 %. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A_Traveller Posted March 23, 2007 Share Posted March 23, 2007 The only negative about Firefox is that it is a memory hog. I can leave it up for a few hours and it jumps from 125mb to well over 300mb in memory and 100 % cpu. there must be something wrong. never experienced that problem. Then I would really like to know what that "something" is. I have had the same problem with Firefox - 100% CPU usage and total lockup of computer when more than a couple of tabs open. .. <snip> The CPU issue was a known one which turned out to be a combination of factors, relating to website specifics {i.e. IE specific code [active X only pages &tc.] within a page} and FF config. Ultimately the position was that it was 'solved' in the FF2 branch, now at 2.0.0.3. I used to be able to provoke it by opening a number of tabs to very IE specific sites and there is still a noticeable hit even now, though it is much improved. Regards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kayo Posted March 23, 2007 Share Posted March 23, 2007 (edited) You can't get the top toolbar to reduce as much as IE. BADFirefox icons are bigger -- take up more space. BAD Firefox cannot save web pages as single .mht archive files -- this is the clincher. BAD You can get all Firefox files saved automatically to desktop instead of stupid locations like My Documents with IE. GOOD The Bookmark feature works a bit better with Firefox in the ability to move them around. GOOD As for extensions and plug-ins ... what do these have to do with the browser? I have to download Skype just the same if I want to use it, and there will be an icon on the lower-right desktop taskbar to start it up. Overall, not much to choose between. For a simpleton like myself IE6 looks and works marginally better, but thanks to all for your comments. Firefox is highly customizable. The size of the icons can be reduced by simply ticking a small box as shown in the picture. You can also tell Firefox where to save your downloads: Tools => Options => Main tab => Downloads. Skype in Firefox? Yeah, heard about it. But seriously, how many people would really want to place call from a web browser? There are sooooooo many god things about Firefox. It's safe and secure. My favorite is that Firefox looks gooooooood. IE looks whiter than my grandfather's dentures. Or blacker than a ethiopian angel... Nice Theme there dude... i particularly love the foxytunes plug in. Play your jukebox right from your browser! Brilliant. Also, theres the De.li.cious plug in, which keeps all your bookmarks so even if I have to use somebody elses PC, I can log in to their online site and retrieve (most) of my bookmarks. For some of them, I use the option to NOT save it to their program, for er... reasons... edit> added> PS> I didn't know that! You can indeed right click anywhere on the tool bar and customize it even more!... just done so with mine Edited March 23, 2007 by kayo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sensei Posted March 24, 2007 Share Posted March 24, 2007 You can't get the top toolbar to reduce as much as IE. BADFirefox icons are bigger -- take up more space. BAD Firefox cannot save web pages as single .mht archive files -- this is the clincher. BAD You can get all Firefox files saved automatically to desktop instead of stupid locations like My Documents with IE. GOOD The Bookmark feature works a bit better with Firefox in the ability to move them around. GOOD As for extensions and plug-ins ... what do these have to do with the browser? I have to download Skype just the same if I want to use it, and there will be an icon on the lower-right desktop taskbar to start it up. Overall, not much to choose between. For a simpleton like myself IE6 looks and works marginally better, but thanks to all for your comments. Firefox is highly customizable. The size of the icons can be reduced by simply ticking a small box as shown in the picture. You can also tell Firefox where to save your downloads: Tools => Options => Main tab => Downloads. Skype in Firefox? Yeah, heard about it. But seriously, how many people would really want to place call from a web browser? There are sooooooo many god things about Firefox. It's safe and secure. My favorite is that Firefox looks gooooooood. IE looks whiter than my grandfather's dentures. Or blacker than a ethiopian angel... Nice Theme there dude... i particularly love the foxytunes plug in. Play your jukebox right from your browser! Brilliant. Also, theres the De.li.cious plug in, which keeps all your bookmarks so even if I have to use somebody elses PC, I can log in to their online site and retrieve (most) of my bookmarks. For some of them, I use the option to NOT save it to their program, for er... reasons... edit> added> PS> I didn't know that! You can indeed right click anywhere on the tool bar and customize it even more!... just done so with mine kayo seems to have found the magic wand! Yeah, right click on any empty space on the tool bar, right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary A Posted March 24, 2007 Share Posted March 24, 2007 Since I am retired I DO have a lot of time. During the past three weeks I have used Firefox, Opera and the IE 7 Add ons Maxthon and Avant as well as the basic IE 7. I had finally settled on Firefox but was disappointed with the speed. I downloaded the speed (tune) up program and it DID speed things up a lot. Unfortunately without using the IE Tab add on, some sites opened up all scrambled. One in particular was Hotmail. Now I have deleted Firefox and am using the add on IE 7 browser Avant. I'm quite happy with Avant and have given up finding anything better. I hear all this security crap and must say that I have NEVER had a problem with IE 6 or IE 7. I use BitDefender and ZoneAlarm Pro and if I ever do have a problem I will look for a new firewall and/or a new anti-virus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sniffdog Posted March 24, 2007 Share Posted March 24, 2007 See these page in both IE and Firefox: http://www.sagemthailand.com/index-en.php and draw your conclusions. A good bet is Netscape who has an option to render in either mozilla or MS ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary A Posted March 24, 2007 Share Posted March 24, 2007 It opens fine with IE 7/Avant. I am also able to see my Ipstar signal strength. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A_Traveller Posted March 24, 2007 Share Posted March 24, 2007 A key element in this is that IE6 and earlier were made an integral part of the OS. This is why problems within it can be so serious. This was a marketing led decision to ensure that web browsing was available under Windows without any additional software {Netscape}. This formed a key part of the monopoly charges. However IE7 is "just" an application, like FF and so doesn't have a privileged access to the OS. It is a wise upgrade and has a noticeable take up. One issue underlying this is the unwillingness of companies and industry groups to work together. MS keeps creating 'standards to meet user demand' and to a large degree manipulates the situation to commercial gain. It should be remembered that MS is a marketing company first and formost, which happens to deal in technology. However, FF is not all sweetness and light, for example to provide speed, it {and Safari} treats onload {code which pre-loads small programs within a website when a page is opened} statements in a different manner than other browsers, especially on refresh {this can also cause performance issues} which, for example can cripple drop down selection lists unless they are specifically written to catch this difference. The other point here is that by and large, the exposure to 'damage' is directly related to the use of the system, in other words visiting 'Miss Spatula, now that what I call flexible' sites will dramatically increase ones 'exposure {pun intended}. Regards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cdnvic Posted March 24, 2007 Share Posted March 24, 2007 Since I am retired I DO have a lot of time. During the past three weeks I have used Firefox, Opera and the IE 7 Add ons Maxthon and Avant as well as the basic IE 7. I had finally settled on Firefox but was disappointed with the speed. I downloaded the speed (tune) up program and it DID speed things up a lot. Unfortunately without using the IE Tab add on, some sites opened up all scrambled. One in particular was Hotmail. Now I have deleted Firefox and am using the add on IE 7 browser Avant. I'm quite happy with Avant and have given up finding anything better. I hear all this security crap and must say that I have NEVER had a problem with IE 6 or IE 7. I use BitDefender and ZoneAlarm Pro and if I ever do have a problem I will look for a new firewall and/or a new anti-virus. Microsoft loves to play that silly game to force people to use IE, and it looks like they won this one. Any site that purposely denies you the ability to read it properly because of what browser you use, should be shunned IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gharknes Posted March 25, 2007 Share Posted March 25, 2007 well I'm a die hard IE user, never had a problem with it, currently using ver 7, I honestly prefer to keep my third party programs to a minimum. only comment I have about the new interface is what they did to the favourites menu system, definetly a step in the wrong direction, it takes me longer to navigate to save a link than in the old interface, hate it. recently removed Norton antivirus as my subscription was up for renewal, decided to try something free, no problems yet, also removing norton cured some problems i had before, system wouldn't go into standby, some fan utilities and clock utilities wouldn't work properly, game speeds increased. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now