Jump to content

PM Prayut did not apologize over oath-taking controversy – government spokeswoman


webfact

Recommended Posts

PM did not apologize over oath-taking controversy – government spokeswoman

 

IMG_22085_20190808154207000000.jpg

 

Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha did not offer an apology to his cabinet colleagues over the oath-taking controversy and the media has misinterpreted the Prime Minister’s remarks about the wording, government spokeswoman Mrs .Narumon Pinyosinwat said today.

 

During a meeting with department heads and provincial governors from around the country on Wednesday at the government complex, the Prime Minister offered an apology for several issues and not specifically for the oath-taking controversy.

 

The Prime Minister said he will take sole responsibility for matters related to the constitution, said Mrs. Narumon, adding that details about those matters would be available to the media at a later date.

 

Full story: https://www.thaipbsworld.com/pm-did-not-apologize-over-oath-taking-controversy-government-spokeswoman/

 

 

thaipbs.jpg

-- © Copyright Thai PBS 2019-08-09
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, bluesofa said:

There are definitely more important things to deal with - like writing songs about his tireless work to increase the country's happiness, but if there's a chance he can be hounded out of office by loss of face, then I'm all for it.

I am not a fan either, but it is like it is. For the stability of the country and one step at the time for restoring democracy, I do believe they have to let the small things be and focus on the important instead. So, if he gets to sit this period. There might be a change for the next. That´s the cornerstone democracy is built on.

  • Like 2
  • Confused 4
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, YetAnother said:

can we at least call a government spokesperson what they really are ? a professional liar

 

20 minutes ago, bluesofa said:

Surely, 'a professional bullshit deflector' sounds better?

 

How about a "Mighty Turd Polisher"?

 

:cheesy::cheesy::cheesy:

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Matzzon said:

Why so much nag. Just let him swear himself in again and get over with it. There are more important things to deal with.

 

Is that not whole point of the controversy.?..it’s a mistake that can be easily rectified....so why aren’t they? 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, bowerboy said:
2 hours ago, Matzzon said:

Why so much nag. Just let him swear himself in again and get over with it. There are more important things to deal with.

Is that not whole point of the controversy.?..it’s a mistake that can be easily rectified....so why aren’t they?

Wouldn't that be seen as a serious loss of face - very important here, therefore I think that's probably unlikely.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, bluesofa said:

Wouldn't that be seen as a serious loss of face - very important here, therefore I think that's probably unlikely.

There’s a reason he didn’t speak it and it wasn’t an accident. Now they have to work out how to avoid doing it again. Only problem is it ain’t going away. And there’s no article 44.

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, rkidlad said:

There’s a reason he didn’t speak it and it wasn’t an accident. Now they have to work out how to avoid doing it again. Only problem is it ain’t going away. And there’s no article 44.

Perhaps I missed seeing the details about that somewhere? Could you explain?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, bluesofa said:

Wouldn't that be seen as a serious loss of face - very important here, therefore I think that's probably unlikely.

Now it would, because it´s been long time discussing. If he just done it from start, no biggie!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, rkidlad said:

You'll have to look into it. But it has something to do with being deeply superstitious. 

OK, thanks.

I know he's superstitious - surely no one else would be seen dead kissing a frog, but he's keen on it. If he really wants to be a politician he ought to stick to kissing infants.

Then he was praying to 'the gods' for rain. When it unfailingly arrived he claimed credit for that too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Matzzon said:

I am not a fan either, but it is like it is. For the stability of the country and one step at the time for restoring democracy, I do believe they have to let the small things be and focus on the important instead. So, if he gets to sit this period. There might be a change for the next. That´s the cornerstone democracy is built on.

Do you really think the government won't spend the next four years (as they did the last 5) laying plans to "win" an election that has , once again, a predetermined outcome? Less a cornerstone of democracy than a barrier wall preventing it. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, bluesofa said:

There are definitely more important things to deal with - like writing songs about his tireless work to increase the country's happiness, but if there's a chance he can be hounded out of office by loss of face, then I'm all for it.

I had forget about those beautiful melodies. I hope he is planning on releasing more soon. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, BobbyL said:
5 hours ago, bluesofa said:

There are definitely more important things to deal with - like writing songs about his tireless work to increase the country's happiness, but if there's a chance he can be hounded out of office by loss of face, then I'm all for it.

I had forget about those beautiful melodies. I hope he is planning on releasing more soon. 

I wouldn't be surprised if he announces he has a record deal and will produce an album of songs with moron more on.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.









×
×
  • Create New...