NATO to expand Iraq training mission in response to Trump

By Robin Emmott

 

NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg speaks at a news conference following a NATO defence ministers meeting at the Alliance headquarters in Brussels, Belgium February 12, 2020. REUTERS/Francois Lenoir

 

BRUSSELS (Reuters) - NATO defence ministers agreed on Wednesday to expand the Western alliance's training mission in Iraq, NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said, responding to a demand by U.S. President Donald Trump for NATO to do more in the Middle East.

 

NATO will take over some of the training activities carried out by the U.S.-led coalition against Islamic State, Stoltenberg said, meaning the decision does not require more Western troops in Iraq but would be with the consent of the Iraqi government.

 

"Today, allied ministers...agreed in principle to enhance NATO's training mission," Stoltenberg told a news conference. "In the first instance, this will consist of taking on some of the global coalition's current training activities."

 

NATO and the coalition have non-combat, "train-and-advise" missions that aim to develop Iraqi security forces, but both are suspended over fears for regional stability after a U.S. drone strike killed a top Iranian commander in Baghdad on Jan. 3.

 

After the killing, Trump called on NATO - founded in 1949 to contain a military threat from the Soviet Union - to do more in the Middle East, without specifying what that might entail.

 

Stoltenberg said the NATO Iraq mission would restart as soon as possible. He declined to give more details. He also said there had been no decision on how many troops would be re-assigned from the U.S.-led coalition.

 

NATO diplomats told Reuters the coalition troops could likely move across and work under a NATO flag from the middle of 2020 now that the political decision has been taken.

 

NATO ministers, including U.S. Defense Secretary Mark Esper, will also discuss more options for the alliance in the Middle East in a bid to mollify Trump, a sharp critic who has accused some allies of being "delinquent" because they do not spend enough on defence.

 

"Ministers also agreed to explore what more we can do beyond this first step," Stoltenberg said.

 

However, many allies say they refuse to join the U.S. maximum pressure campaign against Iran, for instance.

 

Eastern European allies, fearful of Russia since Moscow's 2014 annexation of Crimea, are concerned about shifting too many resources to the Middle East or for NATO to be used as a way for the United States to pull out of the region, diplomats said.

 

(Reporting by Robin Emmott; Editing by Mark Heinrich)

 

-- © Copyright Reuters 2020-02-13

Follow Thaivisa on LINE for breaking Thailand news and visa info

We need to take troops out and send troops in, that is abundantly clear.

4 hours ago, webfact said:

After the killing, Trump called on NATO - founded in 1949 to contain a military threat from the Soviet Union - to do more in the Middle East, without specifying what that might entail.

NATO member Turkey certainly has been doing its part in containing threats in the Middle East: driving the US out of Syria and killing pro-US ally Syrian Kurds. But I suspect Turkish assistance in Iraq will not be welcomed.

 

Training - replacing American trainers with trainers from other NATO countries.

 

Wow - what a fantastic response!

 

Anyone who's worked in region will know just how effective training efforts are with the locals.

3 minutes ago, rhyddid said:

Iraq citizens voted US and whatever Foreign army out of their own land !

Why Western armies keep staying on Iraqi land waging a war that Iraqi a doesn't want !?!?!?!

They do not want any kind of Training, they want to be left alone !!!!

That's not correct. 

It was the parliament, not citizens that voted and was non-binding.  Of the parliament, the Kurds and sunni factions boycotted that vote so only Iranian-aligned shiite members voted.