Davidcharles Posted June 29, 2004 Author Share Posted June 29, 2004 I hadn't realized that my students' grammar was hard-wired into their brains. I guess I'll have to get busy with the wire cutters and soldering iron! HAAAAAAAA! Nice one! Let us know how you get on..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emuu Posted June 29, 2004 Share Posted June 29, 2004 Hard wired grammar sounds so much like nonsense that it is beyond laughter. I have an American friend who is sufficiently fluent in 11 european languages that he is a member of numerous translation committees oversighting major literary works. His grammar is good in each (with its own rules) because he learnt those rules and applies them. On another but related issue; I used to worry about the fluidity of English language, concerned that with such examples as "bad" being used to be exemplary etc, that in 200 years time no-one would be able to decipher what people were saying from our time period. This concern was erased when I realised that no-one was saying anything that was worth retaining for understanding! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
naja Posted June 29, 2004 Share Posted June 29, 2004 Snark obviously is not a linguist as he would know that we Territorians speak the ORIGINAL Australian language. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluecat Posted June 29, 2004 Share Posted June 29, 2004 However, the question is, should teachers with Regional English accents, or Scottish,Irish or Welsh accents be teaching in Thailand? So, as a non English educated guy, I will answer what I think. I do not care. Teach me english with whatever accent is yours. I do not care. I can not hear the difference. I just want to learn english. Kow Chai Mai? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogNo1 Posted June 29, 2004 Share Posted June 29, 2004 If I remember correctly, it was Professor Henry Higgins who said, "Why can't the English learn to speak?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davidcharles Posted June 29, 2004 Author Share Posted June 29, 2004 Don't be foolish Bluecat! The problems will arise when YOU Copy a heavy regional English accent, that is not easily understood, or acceptable, to your prospective employer. Or anybody not entirely familiar with the English Language, for that matter! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluecat Posted June 29, 2004 Share Posted June 29, 2004 The problems will arise when YOU Copy a heavy regional English accent, that is not easily understood, or acceptable, to your prospective employer.Or anybody not entirely familiar with the English Language, for that matter! If my prospective employer is not familiar with the English language, I'm pretty sure he will not mind too much about the accent. Whatever accent we are talkink about,... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davidcharles Posted June 29, 2004 Author Share Posted June 29, 2004 If my prospective employer is not familiar with the English language, I'm pretty sure he will not mind too much about the accent.Whatever accent we are talkink about,... I think it is implicit in my post that the Employer would probably be familiar with English as wot she is spoke........now go to bed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stroll Posted June 29, 2004 Share Posted June 29, 2004 Bluecat hasn't been drinking milk all evening.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mbkudu Posted June 30, 2004 Share Posted June 30, 2004 Was talking about lesbians today at work with me work mates. One of'em said, "They want the cock, but they don't want the rooster." Now that's well spoken English friends! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ProThaiExpat Posted June 30, 2004 Share Posted June 30, 2004 It may be "well spoken English" but it is so blatantly falacious as to be absurd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mbkudu Posted June 30, 2004 Share Posted June 30, 2004 Ahh, I'm sawwee! Did I ofwend you? Does PC stand for pompous curmudgeon? By the way homie, it's spelled: f-a-l-l-a-c-i-o-u-s. Don't worry, we're all f###ups. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluecat Posted June 30, 2004 Share Posted June 30, 2004 Bluecat hasn't been drinking milk all evening.. Jeez, did it show that much? Sorry,... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Up2U Posted July 1, 2004 Share Posted July 1, 2004 BUT, CNN Newscasters are awful in my opinion.Their rapid, nasel, harsh, New York voices grate on my nerves! Sorry, BBC News readers are definitely the very best, when it comes to spoken English. It used to be far too Posh, but now it's just right. Music to my ears..... I thought Richard Quest was working for CNN? Although speaking (shouting?) very quickly, it is not the gabble that one hears from many other newscasters. I yearn for the old days when BBC employed the RADA-sounding announcers, but where would we have been without Jimmy Saville and Tarbie? Regional accem=nts have their place in entertainment. Having worked abroad for thirty years, I have come across all manner of spoken English, but still here in Thailand I frequently have to ask people to repeat in Thai what they have already said in 'English'. Just to confirm my suspicions as to what they were trying to say. (Also 'cos I'm getting deaf or daft) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
footfidforfai Posted July 1, 2004 Share Posted July 1, 2004 Talking about teaching good "Engrish" have a look here...http://www.engrish.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maerim Posted July 1, 2004 Share Posted July 1, 2004 where would we have been without Jimmy Saville and Tarbie? Better off, along with Cilla Black and a load more talentless " TV personalities" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RDN Posted July 1, 2004 Share Posted July 1, 2004 BUT, CNN Newscasters are awful in my opinion.Their rapid, nasel, harsh, New York voices grate on my nerves! Sorry, BBC News readers are definitely the very best, when it comes to spoken English. It used to be far too Posh, but now it's just right. Music to my ears..... I thought Richard Quest was working for CNN? Although speaking (shouting?) very quickly, it is not the gabble that one hears from many other newscasters. I yearn for the old days when BBC employed the RADA-sounding announcers, but where would we have been without Jimmy Saville and Tarbie? Regional accem=nts have their place in entertainment. Having worked abroad for thirty years, I have come across all manner of spoken English, but still here in Thailand I frequently have to ask people to repeat in Thai what they have already said in 'English'. Just to confirm my suspicions as to what they were trying to say. (Also 'cos I'm getting deaf or daft) Then I'm getting just as daft as you! Back to Richard Quest - I must say he has the same effect on me as Lyse Doucet does on BBC World: I switch over. When they're both on, I switch to Discovery or History. The problem with Richard Quest is not that he is unintellible like Doucet - quite the opposite in fact - but that he acts like a superstar. CNN used to be a "personality-free" broadcaster with people simply stating the news, but now it is getting like an entertainment program with its own stars and personalities. A backwards step in my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guiyangpar Posted July 2, 2004 Share Posted July 2, 2004 People who are considered "welll spoken" can come from the U.K, the U.S., France or wherever. Accents can be charming and makes speech more interesting to listen to as long as the accent doesn't get in the way.The danger with generalities is there are so many exceptions. One would like to agree with the many posts regarding the quality of the accents spoken on the BBC, and perhaps they are speaking of the BBC aired in England. They certainly can't be speaking about BBC World News seen on channel 54 on UBC in Thailand. There is one female news reader, who was on assignment in Bagdad during the war there and shortly thereafter, who is now reading news in the evening and she is barely intelligable. Perhaps because she is so unattractive, but my guess the accent is Scottish? I change channels when she comes on because the hard clip to the accent is most annoying and could hardly be touted by any reasonable person to be a standard one would ascribe to. Can anyone name that "mistake". Couldn't agree more!. That Scottish Lady has a far too thick accent. I can't understand her either! Scottish English can be charming. But her's is awful! Just showed your ignorance there . she's not got a scottish acent Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guiyangpar Posted July 2, 2004 Share Posted July 2, 2004 The phrase all you old-timers are looking for is received pronunciation or RP. English is no longer the preserve of native english speakers . It's now a language of international communication. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
astral Posted July 2, 2004 Share Posted July 2, 2004 Just showed your ignorance there . she's not got a scottish acent Perhaps it is a Scotch accent?? My English get blurred after a few wee drams! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maerim Posted July 2, 2004 Share Posted July 2, 2004 The phrase all you old-timers are looking for is received pronunciation or RP.English is no longer the preserve of native english speakers . It's now a language of international communication. Just a pity then that a lot of it on the world service of the BBC is almost impossible to understand because of the employmentcitizens of native countries in the name of political correctness of people who think they can speak English but can't. Whats wrong with recieved pronunciation? At least people can understand it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
astral Posted July 2, 2004 Share Posted July 2, 2004 (edited) English is no longer the preserve of native english speakers . It's now a language of international communication. It may be a language of international communication but if you want the "real thing" then you need an Englishman. American's speak american. Ozzies speak 'strine. Singaporeans speak s'English Lah Ask an Ozzie what a Router is. Does he have one on his computer? Ask an american girl for a rubber, or if you can "knock her up". Each country has its own version of the language, but they are NOT English!! Edited July 2, 2004 by astral Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guiyangpar Posted July 2, 2004 Share Posted July 2, 2004 English is no longer the preserve of native english speakers . It's now a language of international communication. It may be a language of international communication but if you want the "real thing" then you need an Englishman. American's speak american. Ozzies speak 'strine. Singaporeans speak s'English Lah Ask an Ozzie what a Router is. Does he have one on his computer? Ask an american girl for a rubber, or if you can "knock her up". Each country has its own version of the language, but they are NOT English!! You've just made my point for me , Thank you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guiyangpar Posted July 2, 2004 Share Posted July 2, 2004 English is no longer the preserve of native english speakers . It's now a language of international communication. It may be a language of international communication but if you want the "real thing" then you need an Englishman. American's speak american. Ozzies speak 'strine. Singaporeans speak s'English Lah Ask an Ozzie what a Router is. Does he have one on his computer? Ask an american girl for a rubber, or if you can "knock her up". Each country has its own version of the language, but they are NOT English!! There is no such thing as the 'real thing' anymore . English , in its lexical form is a prescriptive rather than a 'descriptive' language Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RDN Posted July 2, 2004 Share Posted July 2, 2004 People who are considered "welll spoken" can come from the U.K, the U.S., France or wherever. Accents can be charming and makes speech more interesting to listen to as long as the accent doesn't get in the way.The danger with generalities is there are so many exceptions. One would like to agree with the many posts regarding the quality of the accents spoken on the BBC, and perhaps they are speaking of the BBC aired in England. They certainly can't be speaking about BBC World News seen on channel 54 on UBC in Thailand. There is one female news reader, who was on assignment in Bagdad during the war there and shortly thereafter, who is now reading news in the evening and she is barely intelligable. Perhaps because she is so unattractive, but my guess the accent is Scottish? I change channels when she comes on because the hard clip to the accent is most annoying and could hardly be touted by any reasonable person to be a standard one would ascribe to. Can anyone name that "mistake". Couldn't agree more!. That Scottish Lady has a far too thick accent. I can't understand her either! Scottish English can be charming. But her's is awful! Just showed your ignorance there . she's not got a scottish acent Oi! Newbie - have a look at page 4 of this thread . We've already determined that she's Canadian! Where have you been? I thought she might have been Irish, someone else thought Scottish. But now we know. Several posts ago. And her name's Lyse Doucet. With a face like a bag of spanners (in case you missed that gem from simesnuts65 earlier). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ProThaiExpat Posted July 2, 2004 Share Posted July 2, 2004 RDN: Thanks for cracking the whip a bit, I would have done it but your so much better at it and whenever I try, I end up in a pissing match, so unproductive when the other doesn't bother to get up to speed before sounding off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guiyangpar Posted July 2, 2004 Share Posted July 2, 2004 English is no longer the preserve of native english speakers . It's now a language of international communication. It may be a language of international communication but if you want the "real thing" then you need an Englishman. American's speak american. Ozzies speak 'strine. Singaporeans speak s'English Lah Ask an Ozzie what a Router is. Does he have one on his computer? Ask an american girl for a rubber, or if you can "knock her up". Each country has its own version of the language, but they are NOT English!! You've just made my point for me , Thank you Aplogies for not reading through the entire thread. Now that I have it just confirms my original opinion that the majority of posters don''t know what they're talking about. It's quite nice to post amongst the dunces every so often Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ajarn Posted July 2, 2004 Share Posted July 2, 2004 RDN: Thanks for cracking the whip a bit, I would have done it but your so much better at it and whenever I try, I end up in a pissing match, so unproductive when the other doesn't bother to get up to speed before sounding off. Uhh, me thinks ya' both should think about those in glass houses, maybe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RDN Posted July 2, 2004 Share Posted July 2, 2004 RDN: Thanks for cracking the whip a bit, I would have done it but your so much better at it and whenever I try, I end up in a pissing match, so unproductive when the other doesn't bother to get up to speed before sounding off. Uhh, me thinks ya' both should think about those in glass houses, maybe. Oooh! Examples please? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ajarn Posted July 3, 2004 Share Posted July 3, 2004 RDN: Thanks for cracking the whip a bit, I would have done it but your so much better at it and whenever I try, I end up in a pissing match, so unproductive when the other doesn't bother to get up to speed before sounding off. Uhh, me thinks ya' both should think about those in glass houses, maybe. Oooh! Examples please? Suffice it to say, you're in no position to get into a pissing contest with me over grammar, as you've already shown But, I would like to add that I think some of the shots you've taken are cheap shots, which anybody can do, since nobody here has ever shown that they exhibit 'perfect' English skills.... Interesting thread, with some interesting and thought provoking comments, but I don't like some of the snide remarks I've seen here. 'nuff said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now