Once again, anybody who doesn't want to leave their poor, helpless Thai spouse their 'worthless' foreign quota condo, here I am. Since you don't own, you don't know what 'they actually believe'--but that doesn't stop you from posting your sarcastic nonsense. From a spouse who does own, me, what I actually believe--which is true--is that I am leaving my Thai spouse good options. First, a paid for roof over his head. That's worth a lot, right there. He can continue to live in it, he can rent it out for income, or he can sell it and either rent something or buy something else. True for other Thai spouses, as well. By the way, you hit the trifecta in your two sentences above--they are condescending, sexist, and racist. You assume that 'the missus' would be floundering around, helpless, not knowing what in the world to do with an inherited, paid-for, condo. A 'windfall'? Certainly not, in your sarcastic opinion. Goodness, a Thai is not equipped to own a property, for heaven's sake! Give them only cash, you say--that's all they could possibly handle. That is certainly not the case with any Thai spouses I know. I wonder if you would be posting the same thing to, say, a foreigner living in Australia leaving a paid-for condo to an Australian spouse. Would an Australian spouse be happy to receive a paid-for condo in OZ from a foreigner spouse? My thinking is 'yes' but, once again, to avoid being accused of making 'assumptions', I asked Google: Yes. An Australian living in Australia with a foreign spouse would likely be very happy to inherit a paid-for Australian property. It provides secure, rent-free housing and builds long-term wealth without any mortgage debt.
Create an account or sign in to comment