December 4, 20214 yr Following link to download THE NEED FOR A PUBLIC HEALTH – NOT A LAW ENFORCEMENT/NATIONAL SECURITY– APPROACH https://security-eu.mimecast.com/ttpwp?tkn=3.YJXlDfCrtlbA7o_thyjFX8WNAg-pHaVyKY9a3qH_s0KwFPCOJx_Vgu_uiV1qZZGWaBnTI7xNmnSjfOAAXRsh17mTKHqiPxhO1wqnY5b09gJDv9U0WzrZmjjJnRU_p0q3KP4qUxVu-7krnDOXnoAkvoTIINIE2CHqdpVJd_qDenmf2s1JG6rqIgTwDPsDuJnw.KHFDOfFfZIoocgAjCeYgqQ#/checking?key=b3BpbmlvbkBjYmMuY2F8cmVxLTJmYzAwMDliZmZkZDdkY2E5MDg3ODA4YmIxZDg4NGU0
December 4, 20214 yr Link does not work. Quote Oops! Invalid token We can't seem to find the page you're looking for.
December 4, 20214 yr Maybe here??? https://www.aclu.org/report/pandemic-preparedness-need-public-health-not-law-enforcementnational-security-approach
December 4, 20214 yr I'm amazed that anybody still thinks the last 18+ months of global wealth reallocation and ideologically driven power grabs has anything remotely to do with health.
December 4, 20214 yr Popular Post 9 minutes ago, Gsxrnz said: I'm amazed that anybody still thinks the last 18+ months of global wealth reallocation and ideologically driven power grabs has anything remotely to do with health. I'm amazed that anyone still thinks aluminum head-gear is still a good look. But then, maybe it's that chip in my head? What can we do?
December 4, 20214 yr Author 2 hours ago, mtls2005 said: Maybe here??? https://www.aclu.org/report/pandemic-preparedness-need-public-health-not-law-enforcementnational-security-approach Thanks - my link worked this AM - no idea why it does not now.
December 4, 20214 yr Author 2 hours ago, Gsxrnz said: I'm amazed that anybody still thinks the last 18+ months of global wealth reallocation and ideologically driven power grabs has anything remotely to do with health. Got to agree with you. This part very telling - The lessons from history should be kept in mind whenever we are told by government officials that “tough,” liberty-limiting actions are needed to protect us from dangerous diseases. Specifically: • Coercion and brute force are rarely necessary. In fact they are generally counterproductive—they gratuitously breed public distrust and encourage the people who are most in need of care to evade public health authorities. • On the other hand, effective, preventive strategies that rely on voluntary participation do work. Simply put, people do not want to contract smallpox, influenza or other dangerous diseases. They want positive government help in avoiding and treating disease. As long as public officials are working to help people rather than to punish them, people are likely to engage willingly in any and all efforts to keep their families and communities healthy. • Minorities and other socially disadvantaged populations tend to bear the brunt of tough public health measures.
December 4, 20214 yr 1 hour ago, seedy said: Simply put, people do not want to contract smallpox, influenza or other dangerous diseases. I wouldn't count the flu as a dangerous disease, 3 days feeling a bit sweaty. (or COVID for that matter) Edited December 4, 20214 yr by BritManToo
December 4, 20214 yr 3 hours ago, BritManToo said: I wouldn't count the flu as a dangerous disease Uhm, there's ~ 50,000,000 people on the line for you, calling from 1918-1920. Well there might be had they not perished.
December 4, 20214 yr 4 hours ago, BritManToo said: I wouldn't count the flu as a dangerous disease, 3 days feeling a bit sweaty. (or COVID for that matter) 200,000 to 600,000 die every year from the flu. Perhaps up to 17MM from Covid. A majority consider these dangerous.
December 4, 20214 yr 8 hours ago, Gsxrnz said: I'm amazed that anybody still thinks the last 18+ months of global wealth reallocation and ideologically driven power grabs has anything remotely to do with health. I'm amazed that anybody still thinks the last 18+ months of millions of deaths have anything to do with money or power grabs. Only those who fall for conspiracy theories would think so.
December 4, 20214 yr 6 hours ago, seedy said: Got to agree with you. This part very telling - The lessons from history should be kept in mind whenever we are told by government officials that “tough,” liberty-limiting actions are needed to protect us from dangerous diseases. Specifically: • Coercion and brute force are rarely necessary. In fact they are generally counterproductive—they gratuitously breed public distrust and encourage the people who are most in need of care to evade public health authorities. • On the other hand, effective, preventive strategies that rely on voluntary participation do work. Simply put, people do not want to contract smallpox, influenza or other dangerous diseases. They want positive government help in avoiding and treating disease. As long as public officials are working to help people rather than to punish them, people are likely to engage willingly in any and all efforts to keep their families and communities healthy. • Minorities and other socially disadvantaged populations tend to bear the brunt of tough public health measures. Sadly, due to anti vax holdouts, voluntary participation isn't working. Mandates are now necessary for the minority who refuse to get vaccinated and are helping to extend this pandemic.
Create an account or sign in to comment