Even some of the "fathers" of AI recommed a temporary halt to further developpement of AI. Basically confessing "we don't know where this will end up".

An exercise in futility. Why? It's us (the users) that use it exponentionally. (Governments, Corporations, Private Users).

How to stop a freight train if we don't want the freight train to stop?

Eventually, we will get what we asked for.

18 minutes ago, swissie said:

Even some of the "fathers" of AI recommed a temporary halt to further developpement of AI. Basically confessing "we don't know where this will end up".

An exercise in futility. Why? It's us (the users) that use it exponentionally. (Governments, Corporations, Private Users).

How to stop a freight train if we don't want the freight train to stop?

Eventually, we will get what we asked for .

They also want an exception from antitrust laws. They are not asking for a pause for the good of humanity; they are asking this to keep out other players.

https://www.reuters.com/world/ftc-chair-suspicious-calls-ai-antitrust-exemptions-2026-09-15/

10 minutes ago, Mr Awesome said:

They also want an exception from antitrust laws. They are not asking for a pause for the good of humanity; they are asking this to keep out other players.

https://www.reuters.com/world/ftc-chair-suspicious-calls-ai-antitrust-exemptions-2026-09-15/

WE are the players that support their ambitions.

A fellow named Steven Bartlett has shared some thoughts on this subject...

Quite scary actually...

The notion of "Jailing Einstein"...

Here is an excerpt...

"Can one code a digital jail, that Einstein can't crack out of?". And let you harness the benefits of having Einstein? Hard to give AI channels that can affect the world for good, without letting it be smarter than you, and find ways to do whatever else it wants..."

https://www.facebook.com/reel/2538854556526162