And for good reasons and, as usual, lots of false information and false conclusions with no link to anything to back it up. Ricky Jones was remanded in custody until his bail hearing, as is standard. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/credz9gl92yo Styler is charged with a serious violent crime, "assaulting an emergency worker by beating", this is an extremely aggravating factor under the law and has been taken in to account. But, maybe more importantly, Styler is also listed as being of "no fixed abode" which is a major factor too, as he is a flight risk and it is almost impossible to monitor the bail conditions of someone with no fixed abode. Jones was a councillor with a fixed address and no prior history, deep ties to his community, and was therefore not deemed a flight risk. Those who are of no fixed abode and cannot be suitably accommodated, will not be able to be electronically monitored as the necessary equipment cannot be installed. The same applies where a landlord/owner of a property refuses permission for the equipment to be installed. Here's a link to explain it: https://www.cps.gov.uk/prosecution-guidance/bail Just scratch the surface Bazzer and there are legal reasons for everything you see as a conspiracy. It takes a simple Google search in most cases. And it is the same if you are black, white, or brown. Oh, by the way, there are are reporting restrictions on these two white guys, just like there were on the Muslims who were tried. You know, standard stuff that you think is a conspiracy or "two tier" nonsense. It is vital that there should be no reporting, commentary or sharing of information online which could in any way prejudice these proceedings. Here you go, another link, as we are supposed to provide to back things up. https://www.cps.gov.uk/wessex/news/two-men-charged-relation-southampton-disorder
