The Supreme Court issued an investigative report on Thursday, announcing that it has yet to determine who leaked a draft opinion overturning Roe v. Wade to the media last year, but at least 90 people had access to the document at one point.

In a statement, the court said that the investigative team “has to date been unable to identify a person responsible by a preponderance of the evidence.” It is also unlikely the leak resulted from a computer hack, the statement said.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/01/19/politics/supreme-court-dobbs-report-leak/index.html

 

Supreme Court Report Sparks Suspicions About Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito

 

On Thursday, the Supreme Court released an unsigned statement concluding that it was unable to determine the identity of the individual responsible for the leak or provide an explanation as to how the draft ended up in the hands of Politico.

 

But while the court was unable to find the person behind the leak that rocked Washington, Twitter users questioned whether some of the more conservative justices were investigated in the inquiry.

 

"They definitely did not interview the justice that leaked this," journalist Sydney Bauer tweeted on Thursday.

 

https://www.newsweek.com/supreme-court-report-sparks-suspicions-about-clarence-thomas-samuel-alito-1775144

Supreme Court probe was an investigation that never wanted an outcome

 

The investigation focused on Court personnel — temporary (law clerks) and permanent employees — who had or may have had access to the draft opinion during the period from the initial circulation until the publication by Politico," the findings say.

Legal experts believe this means that the justices were not questioned or investigated and no investigation was done with personal information.

 

https://www.rawstory.com/supreme-court-never-wanted-investigation/?traffic_source=Connatix