Social Media Posted January 21 Share Posted January 21 Civilians in the West should prepare for conflict with Russia, NATO official says In a startling development, a prominent NATO official has issued a stern warning, advising civilians in the Western world to brace themselves for the possibility of conflict with Russia. Dutch Admiral Rob Bauer, who chairs the NATO military committee, emphasized that while armed forces are gearing up for the prospect of war, it is imperative for citizens to be prepared for a conflict that could significantly alter their lives. Admiral Bauer stressed, "We have to realize it's not a given that we are in peace. And that's why we [NATO forces] are preparing for a conflict with Russia." He further highlighted the broader scope of the discussion, encompassing not only military readiness but also the industrial base and the role that ordinary people play in such scenarios. The admiral commended Sweden for urging its population to prepare for war, emphasizing the importance of acknowledging the unpredictability of the future. "It starts there," Admiral Bauer remarked, emphasizing the need for a collective realization that not everything is foreseeable, and the next two decades may not unfold as smoothly as anticipated. This cautionary message precedes the launch of NATO's most extensive exercise since the Cold War era. The Steadfast Defender exercise aims to simulate the repelling of a potential invasion by Russian forces, involving a massive deployment of approximately 90,000 troops. Among them, 20,000 troops from the United Kingdom are set to participate in the exercise scheduled to run through May. As geopolitical tensions escalate, the warning from Admiral Bauer serves as a stark reminder of the shifting global landscape and the need for comprehensive preparedness at both military and civilian levels. The upcoming NATO exercise underscores the alliance's commitment to readiness and response capabilities in the face of evolving geopolitical challenges. 22.01.24 Source 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thaibeachlovers Posted January 21 Share Posted January 21 Is that the sound of sabres rattling that I hear? With IMO nutters like that in charge it's all but inevitable that the nuclear clock just ticked forward a minute or two. In an invasion by either side, whichever side looks like losing is likely to go nuclear, else why have them at all? I knew a guy that served in BAOR and he said it was accepted that their life span was measured in minutes from the commencement of hostilities. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Celsius Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 39 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said: nuclear clock just ticked forward a minute or two. Great. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skipalongcassidy Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 This is what the world is coming to... haters and the intolerant cannot sit down and civilly discuss events and resolutions... the liberal left in America... the muslims wherever they go... the forum members with Trump sydrome... etc. 5 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Morch Posted January 22 Popular Post Share Posted January 22 3 hours ago, Skipalongcassidy said: This is what the world is coming to... haters and the intolerant cannot sit down and civilly discuss events and resolutions... the liberal left in America... the muslims wherever they go... the forum members with Trump sydrome... etc. You just demonstrated your own point. Well done. 3 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Morch Posted January 22 Popular Post Share Posted January 22 4 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said: Is that the sound of sabres rattling that I hear? With IMO nutters like that in charge it's all but inevitable that the nuclear clock just ticked forward a minute or two. In an invasion by either side, whichever side looks like losing is likely to go nuclear, else why have them at all? I knew a guy that served in BAOR and he said it was accepted that their life span was measured in minutes from the commencement of hostilities. @thaibeachlovers Funny that when Putin is at it, you always come up with some reason to excuse his words. Apparently not a 'nutter', in your book. The rest is your usual scaremongering nonsense. Oh, and I'm sure that some posts down the line you'll toss in something about 'not predicting the future', 'crystal ball' etc. - again, stuff you criticize when others are engaging in. 1 1 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skipalongcassidy Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 33 minutes ago, Morch said: You just demonstrated your own point. Well done. very astute of you... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post billd766 Posted January 22 Popular Post Share Posted January 22 7 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said: Is that the sound of sabres rattling that I hear? With IMO nutters like that in charge it's all but inevitable that the nuclear clock just ticked forward a minute or two. In an invasion by either side, whichever side looks like losing is likely to go nuclear, else why have them at all? I knew a guy that served in BAOR and he said it was accepted that their life span was measured in minutes from the commencement of hostilities. I was with the RAF in Germany during 1973 to 1976 and we all knew that IF hostilities broke out, we also would have had a short life span. But so what? We were all volunteers. I was proud to serve the UK for 25 years, but at 79 with a wonky knee and a bad back, I don't think I would be of much use nowadays. 1 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Celsius Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 What conscripts is NATO going to send? Most importantly, will they WFH? 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thaibeachlovers Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 21 hours ago, Celsius said: What conscripts is NATO going to send? Most importantly, will they WFH? If It's NATO vs Russia I doubt conscripts will make any difference. BTW, if it did come to that they will have a problem finding fit ones, as looking at porn social media in mummy's basement isn't really providing warriors. Apparently the UK is finding it hard to get medically approved volunteers for the military as so many youths are obese over weight and unfit. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thaibeachlovers Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 On 1/22/2024 at 8:19 PM, billd766 said: But so what? We were all volunteers. I served, but had I been told my lifespan would be measured in minutes, I might have changed my mind. Luckily my generation's war did not involve nukes. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Celsius Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 4 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said: If It's NATO vs Russia I doubt conscripts will make any difference. BTW, if it did come to that they will have a problem finding fit ones, as looking at porn social media in mummy's basement isn't really providing warriors. Apparently the UK is finding it hard to get medically approved volunteers for the military as so many youths are obese over weight and unfit. At least someone gets it 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morch Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 6 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said: If It's NATO vs Russia I doubt conscripts will make any difference. BTW, if it did come to that they will have a problem finding fit ones, as looking at porn social media in mummy's basement isn't really providing warriors. Apparently the UK is finding it hard to get medically approved volunteers for the military as so many youths are obese over weight and unfit. @thaibeachlovers Russians do not watch porn? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ozimoron Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 On 1/22/2024 at 6:51 AM, thaibeachlovers said: Is that the sound of sabres rattling that I hear? With IMO nutters like that in charge it's all but inevitable that the nuclear clock just ticked forward a minute or two. In an invasion by either side, whichever side looks like losing is likely to go nuclear, else why have them at all? I knew a guy that served in BAOR and he said it was accepted that their life span was measured in minutes from the commencement of hostilities. Not being prepared for war would increase the chances of it happening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post kwonitoy Posted January 24 Popular Post Share Posted January 24 7 hours ago, ozimoron said: Not being prepared for war would increase the chances of it happening. Si vis pacem, para bellum Latin adage translated as "If you want peace, prepare for war" 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thaibeachlovers Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 4 hours ago, kwonitoy said: Si vis pacem, para bellum Latin adage translated as "If you want peace, prepare for war" Those Roman's knew a few things about war, to be sure. It was only when they decided to contract it out to mercenaries that the end came. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now