Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
57 minutes ago, Lemsta69 said:

 

He's not an illegal alien nor is he a rapist. Let me ask you this: why are you so in love with third world dregs of humanity? When the barbarians are at the gate you're supposed to pour boiling oil on them, not give away your birthright and hand them the keys to the kingdom 🤣

I never claimed he was an illegal alien, however he was convicted of sexual abuse.  Your jump to alleging I'm in love with third world dregs of humanity is quite amusing but sad.  Pouring boiling oil on the barbarians at the gate seems a little excessive as most civilised nations have evolved to believe that sort of act is a tad over the top.  Keys to the kingdom?  Who's the king then?

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
5 hours ago, black tabby12345 said:

Inflation worsened.

Sure about that?

 

5 hours ago, black tabby12345 said:

So many Americans ended up as the jobless/worrying about losing their jobs/business due to his lunacy.

Hows that unemployment rate?

 

2 hours ago, Lacessit said:

IMO inflammatory titles should be strangled at birth, intended to provoke.

The Truth is inflamatory? Some dude sold secrets because he hated Trump. You deny thats the allegation?

  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted

A post and all replies breaking forum rules removed.

 

Rule 28. You will not make changes to messages quoted from other members posts, except for purposes of shortening the quoted post. Do not shorten any post in a way that alters the context of the original post. Do not change the formatting of the post you are quoting

Posted

Hatred or adulation of public figures is best avoided.

They may be right.  They may be wrong.  But one needs to understand what brought them to prominence.  Before pre-judging the issues.

What issues are they claiming to confront?

Are these problems real, or invented (deliberately fostered maybe)?

Are the solutions proposed practicable, in the circumstances?

Are the solutions being applied in a manner likely to produce positive results.

------------------

My present, admittedly tendentious, views :-

 

1.   The United States is facing a very large, and snowballing problem of over-indebtedness.  Brought about by its issuing the global reserve currency, the US dollar.  This has resulted in the long-term postponement of the negative effects that would have been quickly felt if its local currency had not also been the world's reserve currency, in the form of US Treasuries; the partial possession of which by foreign trading partners means loans from abroad.

Borrowing can promote economic development, but research  suggests that when annual borrowing reaches about 90% of GDP, returns on loans break even, and beyond that point GDP fails to increase proportionately to increased borrowing.  US Government debt to GDP is currently about 130%, and considerably higher if one includes corporate and private debt.  And, with much higher interest rates than in the recent past, the debt will grow even if the budget were balanced (which is far from the case).

 

2.   The rush towards economic globalisation, with the lowering and even abandonment of protective measures such as tariffs, has failed to take into account large differences between more developed and less developed nations, in wages and other costs such as taxes and social and environmental protections.  Resulting in the hollowing out in more developed nations of manufacturing and even some service industries.  Including loss of career opportunities.  I.e. a social impact guaranteed to produce resentment.

 

3.   There has been a growing economic divide between the ultra-wealthy and their coterie of policy-promoters on the one hand and the bulk of the population on the other.  The former has generally benefitted from economic crises which have left the general population more impoverished. The explanation: there has been inflation over the years well in excess of the official c.p.i. numbers of around 2%.  Government "money-printing" goes mainly to the big commercial banks who loan it out at very low interest to their major clients.  The latter have little need for extra consumer goods, and so invest it, for example, in the stock market and real estate, causing prices in those sectors to boom way beyond what is normal based upon anticipated annual returns upon investment.

[That the mega-wealthy have more recently been migrating from the quoted sectors to precious metals, notably gold, various major currencies, bitcoin, and certain specific stock-market sectors, could be useful to know.  They have private sources of financial information]

------------------------

The foregoing are, in my estimation, some of the major issues that Trump claims he will resolve.

Can he do it?

No desire to pre-judge the results.  But he seems to have got off to a bad start.

Instead of reducing the budget, as desperately needed, he has increased spending.  To a degree that makes Musk's savings look like peanuts.  His antagonistic nature has led him to further raise the Pentagon's bloated military spending.

He is inconsistent in his pronouncements, seems to have no clear strategy for achieving what he seeks other than confrontation with all and everyone, including countries hitherto closely allied to the U.S.  His brashness is repugnant to many foreigners, although it may be appreciated by some Americans.  Diplomacy is certainly not his forte.

If his predecessors set the US dollar on a downward spiral by using it as a foreign policy tool, he has accelerated its fall.  But then he says he wishes to see it devalued in order to reduce imports and promote exports (from factories that have yet to be built).

Threatening to invade other countries on the grounds of self-interest is an argument that can be used by others.  But perhaps he has in mind Obama's "Americans are a special people." [not subject to international law and such like constraints]

Posted
10 hours ago, Wrwest said:

While it is speculation, projecting the findings and writing of Presidential administration history, I do think it will turn out to be a lie, yes. Oh absolutely, the faults will be observed based on the factual historical documentation. But overall, the Biden Presidency will be judged more positive than negative based on my study of history.

He was a retarded, cancerous fraud and the subject of the biggest fraud on Americans and the ensuing coverup and while constantly lying, misleading, deceiving Americans and the world AND allowing illegal alien invasion leading to the worst humanitarian and security crisis in American history. Biden's legacy is that of failure and fraud and NOTHING positive. Within 6 months he totally botched the Afghan withdrawal causing the death of 16 servicemen setting off on one disaster after another. Inflation reduction Act....Ha Ha ha...... How about giving pardons to crack head Hunter and other members of Bidens crime family, thats got to be a real "positive" for his legacy. Give your head a shake and put a window in your cave and have a look outside.

 

This, pictured below IS true, just compare it to bidens inflation blowout.

 

vlcsnap-2025-05-31-12h42m11s105.png.268a664d7f402eed93c4e02e688f3c4e.png

 

 

 

 

  • Love It 1
  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   1 member





  • Topics

  • Popular Contributors

  • Latest posts...

    1. 0

      Elon Musk Calls Out Cory Booker’s Nazi Gesture, Claims Media Double Standard

    2. 0

      Pressure Mounts on UK Government Over Golden Temple Massacre Inquiry

    3. 14

      'We carry our coffins with us': For Gaza's paramedics, every shift could be their last

    4. 25

      Thailand Live Tuesday 3 June 2025

    5. 0

      Wild Elephant With a Sweet Tooth Strolls Into Shop

  • Popular in The Pub

×
×
  • Create New...