UK-Asylum crisis Keir Starmer Pressured to Suspend ECHR, Deport Migrants

[CharlieH]

 

A common reason for appealing rejected asylum claims is that they breach the person's rights under the ECHR.

 

 

Debate over migration policies intensifies with calls for radical measures.

Sir Keir Starmer is under mounting pressure to address migration challenges by suspending elements of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). Former Labour education secretary Lord Blunkett has proposed this strategy, suggesting it could expedite the deportation of thousands of rejected asylum seekers currently housed in hotels.

 

In an interview with BBC Radio 4, Blunkett recommended temporarily suspending parts of the ECHR and the 1951 UN Refugee Convention. He cited Germany's approach as a precedent, stating, "The Germans have done it, but only for three months. We may have to do it for six months to ensure the appeals process is not abused and to help the Government accelerate deportations."

 

Over 200 hotels are currently used to accommodate more than 32,000 asylum seekers. About 50,000 migrants have appealed their rejected asylum claims, a figure double that of last year. Many cite breaches of their rights under the ECHR as grounds for appeal.

 

The ECHR's articles three and eight, which protect the right to family life and against persecution, are commonly invoked in these legal challenges. In response, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has put forward measures to restrict judges from applying these articles, aiming to streamline the deportation process.

 

On the other hand, Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch has commissioned a review exploring the possibility of the UK leaving the ECHR entirely, with outcomes expected at the upcoming Tory party conference.

 

The escalating debate highlights the complex interplay between human rights obligations and immigration management. As the government looks for solutions, the potential suspension of ECHR elements remains contentious, echoing wider discussions about sovereignty and international commitments.

 

The issue of asylum housing has become increasingly critical, with approximately 200 hotels hosting asylum seekers. This situation underscores the need for more sustainable, long-term solutions to accommodate those seeking refuge while adhering to international agreements.

 

Blunkett argues that suspending parts of the ECHR could provide the government with the necessary leeway to tackle what he describes as an overloaded immigration system. However, opposition from human rights advocates is expected, with concerns about the potential erosion of fundamental protections.

 

As this debate unfolds, the UK grapples with finding a balance between respecting human rights and implementing effective border controls. The outcome of these discussions could shape the future of the UK's immigration policy and its stance on international human rights conventions.

 

  Adapted by ASEAN Now from The Express 2025-08-23

 

 

[The Cyclist]

25 minutes ago, CharlieH said:

Blunkett argues that suspending parts of the ECHR could provide the government with the necessary leeway to tackle what he describes as an overloaded immigration system.

 

David Blunkett, Labour Peer and former Home Secretary under Blair. Has morphed into a rancid, knuckle dragging Far Right racist

 

😀😀😀

 

Sarcasm mode off

 

On the other hand. He might just be a bit of a normal person. Sick to death of what is happening in the UK and wants it stopped.

 

Sarcasm mode on

 

Let loose the dogs of denial, obfuscation and whatabouttery.

 

Don't let any of us down, let us hear your condemnation of Blunkett.