House Republicans on Tuesday approved a $70 billion immigration enforcement package, sending the legislation to President Donald Trump after months of internal party disputes and tense negotiations on Capitol Hill.

Get today's headlines by email

The measure, one of the administration’s top legislative priorities, will provide funding for the Department of Homeland Security, including US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and US Customs and Border Protection (CBP), through the remainder of Trump’s second term.

The House passed the bill by a narrow 214-212 margin along party lines. Independent Representative Kevin Kiley of California joined Democrats in voting against the measure.

GOP Divisions Nearly Derail Bill

The legislation faced several obstacles before reaching final passage. Disagreements emerged between Republican leaders over strategy, while Senate Republicans threatened to block the package because of concerns over a proposed Justice Department settlement fund backed by Trump.

Critics argued the fund could be used to benefit the president’s political allies. Although Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche told lawmakers the initiative would not proceed, some Senate Republicans continued pushing for language to prohibit it.

In the Senate, several Republicans initially delayed the bill over those concerns before ultimately supporting it. Only Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska voted against the measure.

House Hardliners Seek Immigration Vote

The bill also encountered resistance in the House during its final stages.

More than a dozen conservative Republicans temporarily withheld support for a procedural vote as they sought commitments from party leaders to consider a separate immigration crackdown proposal.

According to people familiar with the discussions, the group delayed House action while pressing for a vote on the stricter immigration measure. It remains unclear whether leadership agreed to their demands, and the proposal would likely face significant opposition if brought to the House floor.

Despite those tensions, Republican lawmakers ultimately united behind the funding package.

“This bill breaks the Democrats’ stranglehold over ICE and CBP funding,” Representative Tom McClintock of California said during floor debate.

Democrats Criticize Lack of Oversight

Democrats strongly opposed the legislation, arguing it provides billions of dollars for immigration enforcement without imposing new reforms or oversight requirements on ICE.

The agency has faced scrutiny following fatal shootings involving federal agents that contributed to Democrats blocking previous funding efforts.

Representative Pramila Jayapal of Washington said Republicans were approving the funding package with “no guardrails,” while Representative Morgan McGarvey of Kentucky argued the money could be better spent elsewhere.

“With $70 billion, we could end homelessness in America,” McGarvey said. “Just about anything would be better than giving it to ICE.”

White House Security Funding Removed

One notable administration request was dropped during negotiations.

Trump had sought roughly $1 billion for White House security improvements, including about $200 million connected to his proposed East Wing ballroom project. Senate Republicans raised concerns about the request, and parliamentary rulings also complicated its inclusion.

The final legislation excludes the White House funding provisions.

The bill’s passage highlights both the challenges and the limits of Republican majorities in Congress. Despite repeated threats of defections and disputes over key provisions, GOP lawmakers ultimately delivered a package that closely matches Trump’s original immigration funding demands.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?

Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 10 June 2026

View full article

70 billion. A tidy sum.

If I were a homeless US citizen I would not be voting for Trump. Priorities all wrong.

3 hours ago, trucking said:

70 billion. A tidy sum.

If I were a homeless US citizen I would not be voting for Trump. Priorities all wrong.

If I were an ordinary working Joe in the USA I would never vote Republican. Period. They say there's no money for health care, or education, or cancer research, or affordable housing, or anything that would benefit ordinary working Americans.

But apparently there's plenty of money to go fight a war with Iran that nobody but Netanyahu/Israel wanted (costs about $100 billion so far), and that has inflation and prices in the USA and worldwide skyrocketing. And plenty of money to fund the ICE brown shirts. And they wanted to use tax money to pay $1 billion for the WH ball room. But most of all, there is apparently plenty of money to give the already (very) wealthy a nice big tax cut.
Every Republican president since Reagan has started at least one new war, and the party that claims to be in favor of fiscal responsiblity always racks up the national debt by trillions of dollars. Without fail. Reagan did it. Bush sr. did it. Bush jr. did it. Trump did it in his first term, and now he's doing it again. And then the Democratic president who comes along next is left to clean up the mess that his Republican predecessor made. Every single time. And yet dumb and gullible Americans keep voting Republican. Go figure.

$70B they don't have. How does this work at the bank? To whom are they paying interest?

On 6/10/2026 at 7:35 AM, trucking said:

70 billion. A tidy sum.

If I were a homeless US citizen I would not be voting for Trump. Priorities all wrong.

Protecting millions upon millions of USA citizens was the goal of the Homeland Security Act of 2002. Back than it was a bi partisan Congress that passed legislation. As you bring in homeless into the picture. Taking care of people experiencing homelessness is a shared responsibility between federal, state, and local governments.

Now two decades later the cultural Marxist in the party, international leftist & their Anarchist supporters refuse to recognize Law & Order & Enforcement.

8 minutes ago, riclag said:

Protecting millions upon millions of USA citizens was the goal of the Homeland Security Act of 2002. Back than it was a bi partisan Congress that passed legislation. As you bring in homeless into the picture. Taking care of people experiencing homelessness is a shared responsibility between federal, state, and local governments.

Now two decades later the cultural Marxist in the party, international leftist & their Anarchist supporters refuse to recognize Law & Order & Enforcement.

If that's all they were doing protecting millions of US citizens , but you must know they were doing

much more ,that the majority of the population did not like , and all they are now is the private army

of Trump 🤡.

regards Worgeordie

47 minutes ago, riclag said:

Protecting millions upon millions of USA citizens was the goal of the Homeland Security Act of 2002. Back than it was a bi partisan Congress that passed legislation. As you bring in homeless into the picture. Taking care of people experiencing homelessness is a shared responsibility between federal, state, and local governments.

Now two decades later the cultural Marxist in the party, international leftist & their Anarchist supporters refuse to recognize Law & Order & Enforcement.

Nonsense we were thriving before trump now he’s managed to skrew up the entire planet in our names …..these funds will be used to further the chaos division and disfunction/unity in our nation.its what he does …..destroy.

57 minutes ago, riclag said:

Protecting millions upon millions of USA citizens was the goal of the Homeland Security Act of 2002. Back than it was a bi partisan Congress that passed legislation. As you bring in homeless into the picture. Taking care of people experiencing homelessness is a shared responsibility between federal, state, and local governments.

Now two decades later the cultural Marxist in the party, international leftist & their Anarchist supporters refuse to recognize Law & Order & Enforcement.

Use California as example.

(CalMatters) Immigrants without legal status ,why is any federal or state money going to comprehensive coverage for people here illegally? Federal law prohibits full Medicaid for undocumented immigrants, yet California spends billions of its own taxpayer dollars on it. Combine that with all the other costs of illegal immigration , education, healthcare, law enforcement, shelter , and estimates like FAIR put the national net burden at $150 billion per year during the Biden/Harris border surge.

That money could be better spent helping American homeless veterans and citizens instead of prioritizing those who entered illegally. Priorities seem completely backwards.

"The administration acknowledged that more people are enrolled in the program than the state anticipated, and that the state is spending $2.7 billion more than it planned on coverage expansions for immigrants without legal status".

https://calmatters.org/health/2025/03/medi-cal-budget-shortfall/