The objections arise for both cultural and historical reasons that related to relationship between citizens and the state. The UK has had national ID during war time, but it was an emergency war power that was abandoned at the end of the war. A common refrain is “citizens choose the government, the government doesn’t choose the citizens”. An alternative, deeply routed cultural and legal principal is, if you are legally going about your own business, who you are and what you are doing is nobody else’s business. However, there are other issues at play, in particular the use of ‘wedge issues’ to ferment division in society. Interestingly, those claiming a totalitarian Government might use digital ID to control citizens, use digital ID to switch off their rights are frequently the same people demanding the UK leave the ECHR and that the UK Government will be the safe guardian of citizens rights. Two diametrically opposing wedge issues frequently found rattling around in the same head. I personally see both the advantages and the disadvantages. I have a very vivid memory of being assigned to a duty post in Singapore, after arriving and registering with the Singapore government I had to wait a few days for my ID to show up. During this time I was unable to register a new phone, internet service, sign a rental contract, buy a season travel ticket, the list goes on. I was effectively a ‘non-person’. The very real risk of Digital ID is that those not entitled to register or unable to register for reasons of age, ability, become ‘non-persons’ open to abuse and manipulation by criminal gangs and criminal individuals. It’s one of those ideas that look great on paper but that are fraught with serious risks.
Create an account or sign in to comment