The deaths of three US servicemembers over a 24-hour period this weekend have raised concerns in Washington that President Donald Trump could press for further escalation in the war involving Iran, even as both sides signal they are keeping diplomatic channels open.

The servicemembers’ deaths increased the US death toll in the conflict to 17 since fighting began in March. The Pentagon said on Monday that since US Central Command (Centcom) began daily waves of strikes against Iran on 7 July, nearly 100 service members in the command’s area of responsibility have been wounded. Of those injured, it said 96% have returned to duty.

Vali Nasr, a professor of international affairs at Johns Hopkins University, said the exchange of blows changes the political calculations facing Trump. In an interview with The Hill, he said the immediate impact on US personnel could create pressure for a broader response if further casualties occur, or if a US ship is attacked.

Victoria Coates, Trump’s former national security adviser, said the deaths marked “a new phase” and pointed to the “sobering” nature of the events. She said the Iranian leadership appeared increasingly desperate while adding that the United States should treat the situation as serious.

Strikes follow servicemembers’ deaths

The Trump administration responded to the deaths by carrying out strikes over the weekend on Iranian military command centres, air defence and coastal surveillance sites, maritime capabilities, missile and drone launch sites, and communications networks.

In a TruthSocial post on Monday, Trump warned that Iran would “pay” multiple times for killing an American servicemember. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Trump would attend the dignified transfer of the fallen service members at Dover Air Force Base.

Michael Rubin, a Pentagon official during the second George W. Bush administration, said fatalities were an expected consequence of war while also noting that the deaths could provide impetus for those urging a response.

A White House official told The Hill that Trump is focused on ensuring Iran pays for what Washington described as violations of a memorandum of understanding and for “acts of terrorism” in the Strait of Hormuz.

Diplomacy remains open, both sides say

Despite the intensified military campaign, senior figures on both sides indicated that diplomacy was still possible. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said over the weekend that talks with Iran remained open and would continue if Iran showed that the channel could work. He spoke at Joint Base Andrews.

Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei said on Monday that the two countries were continuing to exchange messages through mediators. He said diplomatic efforts had remained active in recent days and that ideas had been conveyed without providing further details.

US forces have continued strikes for a 10th consecutive day since a fragile ceasefire broke down. Centcom said the attacks included strikes from coastal surveillance and air defence facilities, maritime capability targets, missile and drone storage sites, underground weapons storage locations, bridges and other infrastructure.

Iran said it has retaliated against at least four countries in the region, targeting US positions in Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait and Jordan. Kuwait’s military said its forces were working on intercepting Iranian munitions. A Jordanian state broadcaster reported that Jordan intercepted three incoming Iranian missiles on Monday.

Coates said Iran’s ability to target US forces in the region has been degraded since the war began earlier this year, citing a decline from “well over a hundred” missile launches at the start to single digits per day. She said the trend would likely worsen for Iran.

Nasr said the United States appeared prepared for a long campaign but added that economic pressure could prompt another truce. He also cautioned that escalation could still occur regardless of US intent.

Hormuz blockade and public concern

Beyond air and maritime strikes, the US has sought to squeeze Iran’s economy by resuming a naval blockade in the Strait of Hormuz. Centcom said on Monday that it redirected seven commercial vessels and disabled one ship to prevent it from entering an Iranian port.

Nasr said that while the US could impose costs, breaking Iran’s hold on the strait would likely require a far larger conflict, given Tehran’s ability to raise risks for ship owners and insurers with limited attacks.

The renewed hostilities have also pushed gas prices back to about $4 a gallon. A Washington Post-Ipsos poll released last week found that only one in four voters expect Trump’s negotiations with Iran to produce a better deal than the agreement reached during the Obama administration. It also reported that majorities of Americans were not confident talks would reduce gas prices or prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon.

In the region, Coates highlighted potential diplomatic momentum beyond the Iran conflict. She said Lebanese President Michel Aoun would become the first Lebanese president to meet a US president at the White House on Tuesday to discuss how to disarm Hezbollah, an Iran-backed militant group.

Join the discussion?

21 July 2026

View full article

Trump’s hard line with Iran looks like Margaret Thatcher’s Falklands moment: unpopular at home, squeezed by fuel costs and skepticism, but choosing confrontation abroad to claw back ground.

Thatcher’s approval was scraping bottom before the Falklands, but victory reframed her as decisive, the Iron Lady!

Trump’s blockade in Hormuz and strikes on Iranian assets carry the same logic. But if escalation drags on without a clear win, the Thatcher parallel breaks, leaving only fatigue.

Instead of steely resolve, Trump will be seen as nothing more than the Gilded Buffoon.

1 hour ago, Jim Waldron said:

Thatcher’s approval was scraping bottom before the Falklands, but victory reframed her as decisive, the Iron Lady!

The Falklands War had nothing to do with her being called the "Iron Lady"!

The nickname "Iron Lady" was given to Margaret Thatcher by the Soviet newspaper Red Star after she delivered a speech on January 19, 1976,

A former Trump administration official has claimed Donald Trump is being drawn ever deeper into the conflict with Iran because foreign adversaries know exactly how to exploit his personality. The insider argues that America's enemies have discovered a simple tactic: keep provoking the US President and the war keeps going.

The article claims the conflict, which Trump allegedly promised would end within days, has now stretched into its fifth month because Iran benefits from prolonging it. According to the former Department of Homeland Security chief of staff, Tehran understands that personal insults directed at Trump can shape his reactions and influence US decision-making.

Drawing on experiences from Trump's first term, the author says foreign governments quickly split into two camps. America's allies allegedly relied on flattery, carefully praising Trump during meetings and state visits because they believed it produced diplomatic results.

America's adversaries, the author argues, chose the opposite approach. Instead of compliments, they used public insults and provocations designed to trigger emotional responses from the President and disrupt policy discussions.

The writer recalls White House meetings that were intended to focus on government business but instead became dominated by discussions about criticism from foreign leaders and how the administration should respond. According to the account, issues of policy were sometimes overtaken by questions of retaliation and public image.

North Korea is presented as the first major example. The article says Pyongyang combined missile launches with public insults, including branding Trump a "dotard", before later changing tactics by offering diplomatic engagement through high-profile summits and personal correspondence with Kim Jong-un.

The author claims Iran has now adopted a similar strategy. Since fighting began in February, Iranian state media has allegedly circulated videos mocking Trump, while murals in Tehran have depicted his death and threatened his family. The article also argues that reported assassination plots have been publicised deliberately because attracting attention is itself part of the strategy.

The piece further claims the Trump administration offered Iran a reconstruction package worth hundreds of billions of dollars in exchange for commitments Tehran had previously made and for reopening the Strait of Hormuz. It says Iran rejected the proposal and argues that such a refusal suggests outside backing.

The author points to Russia and China as Iran's key supporters. Reference is made to a 20-year strategic partnership signed between Russia and Iran before Trump's second inauguration, Iranian purchases of Russian air defence systems worth almost $590 million, reports that Moscow shared intelligence and drone tactics, and China's continued purchases of sanctioned Iranian oil.

According to the article, Moscow and Beijing benefit if the United States remains tied down in the Gulf because it limits Washington's ability to support Ukraine, reinforce the Pacific and respond to tensions over Taiwan. The author predicts Iran will continue a strategy of keeping the conflict active enough to prevent US withdrawal while avoiding a decisive confrontation.

Looking ahead, the writer argues Trump is unlikely to change course because advisers were never able to persuade him to abandon personal grievances during his first presidency. Instead, the author says pressure from Republican lawmakers and Congress over continued war funding may represent the only realistic route to limiting further escalation.

I worked with Trump. I know why he is being so easily goaded into a forever war

Thatcher 's decisions have been accounted for by

her complete lack of empathy.

Sounds familiar ?

But the murder of 180+ Iranian school girls by Israel and the USA does not warrant retaliation?

We kill yours , but you can't kill ours ?

4 hours ago, Jim Blue said:

Thatcher 's decisions have been accounted for by

her complete lack of empathy.

Sounds familiar ?

Thatcher's total failure to protect Hong Kong from a CCP takeover, as a result of her signing the Joint Declaration, was pathetic.

16 hours ago, Jim Waldron said:

Trump’s hard line with Iran looks like Margaret Thatcher’s Falklands moment: unpopular at home, squeezed by fuel costs and skepticism, but choosing confrontation abroad to claw back ground.

Thatcher’s approval was scraping bottom before the Falklands, but victory reframed her as decisive, the Iron Lady!

Trump’s blockade in Hormuz and strikes on Iranian assets carry the same logic. But if escalation drags on without a clear win, the Thatcher parallel breaks, leaving only fatigue.

Instead of steely resolve, Trump will be seen as nothing more than the Gilded Buffoon.

9 minutes ago, Thingamabob said:

Thatcher's total failure to protect Hong Kong from a CCP takeover, as a result of her signing the Joint Declaration, was pathetic.

It was a handover not a takeover.

The "no more foreign adventures" man has become the inept and incompetent war president. He just does not seem to care about dead Americans, nor inflation, as he likely has plans to rig the midterms.

Let us hope he fails miserably, just as he has failed with everything since being elected.

Bye bye Don.

5 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

It was a handover not a takeover.

6 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

It was a handover not a takeover.

Correct. Well noted. Perhaps a more accurate description would be a sell-out.

5 minutes ago, Thingamabob said:

Correct. Well noted. Perhaps a more accurate description would be a sell-out.

Then blame Claude Maxwell MacDonald for the sell-out not Thatcher.

25 minutes ago, Thingamabob said:

Thatcher's total failure to protect Hong Kong from a CCP takeover, as a result of her signing the Joint Declaration, was pathetic.

Do you know that all HK British passports holders lost their automatic right to come and settle in the UK??

This were to prevent another Ugandan, Asians scenario so the "Overseas British dependency" act were passed before handover in 1997. This stopped Chinese UK passport holders entering the UK freely.

It also grabbed the Falkland Islanders who during the Falklands War (1982) were not Full British Citizens.

This error were changed in 1983 by a specific commons bill, so Frankie the sheep farmer in Goose Green were now a full British citizen as Ahmed the taxi driver in Bradford.

8 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

Then blame Claude Maxwell MacDonald for the sell-out not Thatcher.

...whose remains lie in Brookwood cemetery. A bit before my time. My blame goes to Percy Cradock who enjoyed a cosy relationship with Beijing.

6 minutes ago, tmd5855 said:

Do you know that all HK British passports holders lost their automatic right to come and settle in the UK??

This were to prevent another Ugandan, Asians scenario so the "Overseas British dependency" act were passed before handover in 1997. This stopped Chinese UK passport holders entering the UK freely.

It also grabbed the Falkland Islanders who during the Falklands War (1982) were not Full British Citizens.

This error were changed in 1983 by a specific commons bill, so Frankie the sheep farmer in Goose Green were now a full British citizen as Ahmed the taxi driver in Bradford.

Excellent info ! Appreciated.

3 hours ago, JimHuaHin said:

But the murder of 180+ Iranian school girls by Israel and the USA does not warrant retaliation?

3 hours ago, JimHuaHin said:

But the murder of 180+ Iranian school girls by Israel and the USA does not warrant retaliation?

3 hours ago, JimHuaHin said:

But the murder of 180+ Iranian school girls by Israel and the USA does not warrant retaliation?

Indeed! But the orange felon is too stupid to understand in any event

He has had at least 5 bankruptcies and now he is trying to damage the world economy- and sadly he is succeeding in that regard

34 minutes ago, Legal Lifeline said:

Indeed! But the orange felon is too stupid to understand in any event

He has had at least 5 bankruptcies and now he is trying to damage the world economy- and sadly he is succeeding in that regard

...but not the US which is now exporting oil and gas to world markets. Communists apart it is unlikely anyone wants to destroy the world economy.

As Trump escalates his unprovoked attacks on Iran, the US defense posture become more and more tentative. In the meanwhile, US foreign policy and the Iran war is driven by the lies of this malignant narcissistic psychopath as well as the lies of virtually every member of his cabinet.

The US has become the exact opposite of what John Quincy Adams posited.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
But she [the United States of America] goes not abroad, in search of monsters to destroy.

She is the well-wisher to the freedom and independence

of all.

She is the champion and vindicator only of her own.

She will commend the general cause by the countenance

of her voice, and the benignant sympathy of her example.

She well knows that by once enlisting under other

banners than her own, were they even the banners of foreign

independence, she would involve herself beyond the power

of extrication, in all the wars of interest and intrigue, of

individual avarice, envy, and ambition, which assume the

colors and usurp the standard of freedom.

The fundamental maxims of her policy would insensibly

change from liberty to force....

She might become the dictatress of the world. She would

be no longer the ruler of her own spirit...
-John Quincy Adams July 4, 1821

👆🏼We are here. Read 'em and weep. 👆🏼

2 hours ago, Eric Loh said:

It was a handover not a takeover.

Right. When the lease is up, as was the case, you have to pack up and leave unless you can arrange a new lease with the owner... which it appears didn't happen. The Chinese would have not looked kindly on the Brits if they had decided Hong Kong would do as a 'squat'.

3 dead americans is nothing compared with the all the people Trump and his fellow terrorists killed... Sorry, NO compassion for america! To balance the death toll it should be much more....

6 hours ago, Eric Loh said:

Then blame Claude Maxwell MacDonald for the sell-out not Thatcher.

He was a diplomat, so Thatcher was his boss. MacDonald was probably responsible, but Thatcher was absolutely accountable for the Handover Agreement (from the British side). Obviously some aspects of that Agreement were good and some were bad, lots of grey shades depending on the individual viewpoint. Deng was very pleased with it apparently. His statue in a park in Shenzhen seems to show a very happy Deng striding towards HK...