New report warns China, Russia, Iran and North Korea are forming a powerful anti-West axis

A growing partnership between China, Russia, Iran and North Korea is creating one of the most serious strategic threats the United States has faced in decades, according to a new report that warns Washington could soon be forced to confront several major international crises at the same time.

The study, Axis of Aggressors: Countering the Cooperation of China, Russia, Iran and North Korea, argues the four authoritarian states are increasingly operating as a coordinated bloc despite lacking a formal military alliance like NATO. Instead of treaty obligations, they are bound by shared interests, providing each other with military hardware, economic support, intelligence and advanced technology.

Cooperation now spans every major security area

Researchers at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies documented 616 separate examples of security cooperation between the four countries from 2019 through the end of 2025. These included arms transfers, joint military exercises, weapons development, intelligence sharing, cyber operations and technology exchanges.

Retired Rear Admiral Mark Montgomery, one of the report's authors, said the evidence is already visible on the battlefield.

After recently visiting Ukraine, Montgomery argued the conflict has become far more than a war between Kyiv and Moscow.

According to him, Russia is fighting with North Korean troops and ammunition, Iranian drones and Chinese economic and technological backing, allowing Moscow to sustain a conflict that would otherwise have become far more difficult.

The danger of multiple crises

The report identifies what it calls the "simultaneity problem" as the greatest challenge facing the United States.

Rather than responding to a single conflict, Washington could be forced to deal with several coordinated flashpoints at once.

If China moved against Taiwan, for example, North Korea could simultaneously threaten South Korea, while Russia increased pressure on NATO's eastern flank and Iran stepped up attacks or terrorism across the Middle East.

The authors warn such overlapping crises could stretch American military resources and decision-making beyond their limits.

China emerges as the bloc's economic engine

Although the four countries have differing interests, the report argues China has become the partnership's financial backbone.

Beijing purchases large quantities of discounted Russian and Iranian energy while supplying both countries with manufactured goods, technology and access to Chinese markets.

The report claims China now buys up to 95 percent of Iran's oil exports, with much of the sanctioned crude reaching Chinese refiners through indirect trading routes.

Co-author Elaine Dezenski said these economic links are the foundation upon which military cooperation has expanded, enabling all four governments to withstand Western sanctions more effectively.

Alternative financial systems challenge sanctions

The report also highlights growing efforts by China, Russia and Iran to reduce their dependence on the U.S. dollar.

Increasing volumes of international trade are now being settled in Chinese yuan through Beijing's Cross-Border Interbank Payment System (CIPS), offering an alternative to the Western financial system.

The authors argue that if these networks continue to grow, they could weaken Washington's ability to enforce sanctions against hostile states.

Cyber cooperation raises fresh concerns

Beyond conventional military cooperation, the report says cyber collaboration is becoming increasingly sophisticated.

The authors claim government-backed hackers and criminal cyber groups frequently cooperate, allowing states to conduct cyberattacks while maintaining plausible deniability.

Examples cited include Iranian cybercriminals working alongside Russian ransomware groups, Chinese hackers operating on Russian dark-web forums and North Korean hackers sharing infrastructure with Russian intelligence-linked operators.

Military leaders warn the threat is growing

Several former senior American military commanders endorsed the report's findings.

Retired Air Force Lieutenant General Richard Newton said the challenge now extends well beyond military modernization, arguing that the growing coordination between the four governments represents an unprecedented strategic problem for the United States.

Former NATO Supreme Allied Commander General Philip Breedlove went further, arguing that the West continues to underestimate the nature of the confrontation.

He said China, Russia, Iran and North Korea are no longer simply strategic competitors but governments actively working to weaken American influence and reshape the international order in their favour.

Authors urge a stronger Western response

The report recommends that the United States and its allies respond by expanding defence production, strengthening alliances, improving protection for critical infrastructure and enforcing sanctions more aggressively across the financial and shipping networks that support Russia and Iran.

Its central conclusion is that policymakers should no longer view the four countries as isolated challenges, but as an increasingly coordinated strategic partnership capable of applying pressure across multiple regions simultaneously.

While the alliance remains informal and marked by competing interests, the authors argue its practical impact is already reshaping conflicts in Europe, the Middle East and the Indo-Pacific—and could define the next phase of global security competition.

SOURCE

Stop with the fascist fear mongering already.

2 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

Stop with the fascist fear mongering already.

It is no fear mongering.

It may not be a threat in the very near future, but when you alienate the whole world against you on different levels, then you may expect some rebuke from the most powerful countries.

While the US in itself may be one of the most powerful countries in the world, combined strength from a few less powerful nations makes unstoppable greatness possible.

Forever wars need forever enemies. The current Forever Enemies are China, Russia, Iran, and the DPRK.
The American public loses; the War Industry (MIC) thrives, as does the US Information Industrial Complex.

There is money, good money, to be made by convincing the plebs that war's better than trade.

In the meanwhile American roads, railroads, and similar infrastructure falls apart.

8 minutes ago, connda said:

Forever wars need forever enemies. The current Forever Enemies are China, Russia, Iran, and the DPRK.
The American public loses; the War Industry (MIC) thrives, as does the US Information Industrial Complex.

There is money, good money, to be made by convincing the plebs that war's better than trade.

In the meanwhile American roads, railroads, and similar infrastructure falls apart.

Certainly far more money to be made if the country is on a "war footing ".

“The authors” of the report want “a stronger Western response”!

Stay out of the effing way is the right responce. The US has pushed its agenda on other countries for more than 100 years.

Any of those wars or conflicts work long-term? Have you not seen the same problem arise in the same place or elsewhere.

Violence is Whack-a-Mole and it NEVER works. Just a Band-Aid till it repeats itself.

The US always thought it was the world’s defender of democracy, rights and freedom. Not really. Just a bully.

Step out of the ring when you’re beat.

Direct Trust in Denials: On 24 July 2026, Trump posted on Truth Social that Putin (alongside Chinese President Xi Jinping) personally promised him they would not supply weapons or military aid to Iran. Speaking to reporters later at the White House, Trump explicitly said, "I think I trust them," regarding those denials.

And then you have Trump doing his utmost to tear apart US alliances with friendly states- invade Canada, Greenland, tariffs applied at will.

What a state the United States is in.

The fifth member of the ‘Access of Aggression/Enemies of the West’ is missing from the photo montage in the OP.

MAGA/GOP propaganda - the biggest threat to the USA currently occupies the White House with the aid of MAGA/GOP.

35 minutes ago, JimHuaHin said:

MAGA/GOP propaganda - the biggest threat to the USA currently occupies the White House with the aid of MAGA/GOP.

That would be your dear cult leader.

40 minutes ago, JimHuaHin said:

MAGA/GOP propaganda - the biggest threat to the USA currently occupies the White House with the aid of MAGA/GOP.

Or propaganda from Trump's enemies maybe.

I'm calling fake news on this.

Trump seems to have a good relationship with Putin, at least.

21 hours ago, connda said:

Forever wars need forever enemies.

I don't think Trump wants forever wars.

It was the previous administrations, Neocons, the globalists, the deep state, the CIA.

I'm calling fake news on this.

Let's see how it plays out ...

China-North Korea-Iran-Russia were well integrated and conspiring together long before Trump. All that Trump has done is distracted attention from this cabal and highlighted the weakneess of the western alliance.

And for all of his faults, Trump has forced the western countries to invest in their own defence. If it wasn't for Trump. Canada, Norway, Denmark and Sweden would not be investing in defending their own territorial sovereignty.

Then there are the bit players in this opposition. Pakistan is one, at least the ISI, which has always been a thorn in the side of the US.

 

The ISI will find a way to get a nuke, and perhaps a mobile launcher, to Iran. Yes, Pakistan’s nukes are under the control of the Pak military, but there are enough kindred spirits within the Pak mil whom ISI can exploit to get a nuke or two.

 

The ISI might be bad guys, but they are clever. They have the capability of moving a nuke or two into Iran. It would be tough to get a delivery system into Iran, but the nuke itself would not be difficult, hidden among the normal cross border trade that happens between the two nations in distant and desolate areas. US intel in that area is now quite limited, as under Trump most of the ME and SA experts were fired, since they had views on the feasibility of attacking Iran that differed from Trump’s “gut feel”.

 

The ISI would only need Pakistan deniability, and Pakistan could then claim “rogue elements”, not Pak leadership, was responsible.

 

Even if the ayatollah was against the use of nukes, there are hard line elements within the IRGC---likely already aligned with Pakistan’s ISI---who would support such an action.

15 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

I don't think Trump wants forever wars.

It was the previous administrations, Neocons, the globalists, the deep state, the CIA.

I'm calling fake news on this.

Let's see how it plays out ...

Please give up the ghost.

You clearly know absolutely nothing about the intentions and desires of the men and women in US intel. Your statement is absolute proof of that lack of knowledge. Your comment sounds like something picked up from a conspiracy site on the web....CIA blah blah blah....Deep State blah blah blah.

Whatever Trump claimed he was before, he's now a pure and adulterated war monger. He has attacked 9 countries since coming back into the WH. He talks of attacking Cuba, Mali and Greenland. He makes the Neocons look like pacifists.

I don't think so , all of them except Iran are the Presidents best friends , he has

said just that many times , he's really loves Dictators ,and would just love to be

one himself .

regards Worgeordie

drones are sent to russia and they modify them with jet engines ,no doubt they will supply nukes to iran at some stage in the future ,do we wait and see. no we dont.act now

On 7/31/2026 at 10:10 AM, worgeordie said:

I don't think so , all of them except Iran are the Presidents best friends , he has

said just that many times , he's really loves Dictators ,and would just love to be

one himself .

regards Worgeordie

Isn't he already?

Bye bye, Miss American Pie...