Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

ASEAN NOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

U.S. airman faces military charges after attacking Trump over Iran war

Featured Replies

U.S. airman faces military charges after attacking Trump over Iran war

Military Trouble.jpg

Air Force Major detained after calling for Trump’s impeachment

A U.S. Air Force major is facing military justice charges after publicly attacking President Donald Trump over the Iran war — including calling for the president’s impeachment while wearing his uniform at the U.S. Capitol.

Major Jason Watson, 40, has been detained twice in recent weeks and is now being held in pre-trial confinement. The case has attracted attention because his lawyers say it could be one of the rare instances of an officer of his rank being prosecuted under Article 88 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, which covers contemptuous words directed at senior government officials.

The Air Force confirmed Tuesday that Watson faces three Article 88 violations, along with charges involving disobeying orders and conduct unbecoming an officer.

‘Impeach. Convict. Remove.’

Watson was first detained on July 1 after protesting on the steps of the Capitol while in uniform. He was carrying a sign reading: “Impeach. Convict. Remove.”

The slogan was directed at Trump and turned a political protest into a confrontation with military rules governing the political activity and public conduct of serving personnel.

The case escalated after Watson subsequently gave an interview to CNN in which he launched an extraordinary attack on the president.

Watson accused Trump of being a “failure as president”, violating the Constitution, breaking the law and engaging in corruption. He also accused the president of “killing Americans” — a particularly explosive allegation given the continuing conflict with Iran.

Military discipline versus free speech

The Air Force's position is that wearing the uniform carries obligations that do not apply to ordinary civilians. After Watson's first detention, Air Force Secretary Troy Meink said airmen were expected to comply with laws and policies governing personal conduct, political participation and the wearing of the uniform.

But Watson's supporters see something much bigger at stake: whether a serving military officer can publicly condemn the president without facing the full force of military justice.

His attorney says Watson “stands by the fact that he did this so others wouldn't have to.”

That puts the case squarely at the intersection of military discipline and America's fiercely protected tradition of political speech.

A rare and highly public case

Military disciplinary matters are often handled away from the public spotlight. Watson's case is different because his protests, arrests and political statements have all taken place publicly — and because Article 88 is rarely used.

His lawyers believe Watson may be among the first officers of his rank to face such charges under the provision.

The outcome could therefore have significance beyond one officer and one political protest.

At its heart is a difficult question for Trump's America: when a military officer believes the commander-in-chief is dangerously wrong, does the uniform require silence — or can conscience still speak?

SOURCE

 

It is my understanding that he was arrested on the steps of the Capitol not because he was in uniform, but because it's prohibited to protest there unless accompanied by a member of Congress.
He was originally, escorted to the steps by House Rep. Al Green (D-TX) but when Rep. Green left, Major Watson continued his protest unescorted and was subsequently arrested by Capitol Police.

As for military tribunal? Well, his protest and CNN interview (!) sure got the attention of his superiors, didn't it?

Peaceful criticism is now an attack.

19 hours ago, Social Media said:

U.S. airman faces military charges after attacking Trump over Iran war

Military Trouble.jpg

Air Force Major detained after calling for Trump’s impeachment

A U.S. Air Force major is facing military justice charges after publicly attacking President Donald Trump over the Iran war — including calling for the president’s impeachment while wearing his uniform at the U.S. Capitol.

Major Jason Watson, 40, has been detained twice in recent weeks and is now being held in pre-trial confinement. The case has attracted attention because his lawyers say it could be one of the rare instances of an officer of his rank being prosecuted under Article 88 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, which covers contemptuous words directed at senior government officials.

The Air Force confirmed Tuesday that Watson faces three Article 88 violations, along with charges involving disobeying orders and conduct unbecoming an officer.

‘Impeach. Convict. Remove.’

Watson was first detained on July 1 after protesting on the steps of the Capitol while in uniform. He was carrying a sign reading: “Impeach. Convict. Remove.”

The slogan was directed at Trump and turned a political protest into a confrontation with military rules governing the political activity and public conduct of serving personnel.

The case escalated after Watson subsequently gave an interview to CNN in which he launched an extraordinary attack on the president.

Watson accused Trump of being a “failure as president”, violating the Constitution, breaking the law and engaging in corruption. He also accused the president of “killing Americans” — a particularly explosive allegation given the continuing conflict with Iran.

Military discipline versus free speech

The Air Force's position is that wearing the uniform carries obligations that do not apply to ordinary civilians. After Watson's first detention, Air Force Secretary Troy Meink said airmen were expected to comply with laws and policies governing personal conduct, political participation and the wearing of the uniform.

Advertisement

But Watson's supporters see something much bigger at stake: whether a serving military officer can publicly condemn the president without facing the full force of military justice.

His attorney says Watson “stands by the fact that he did this so others wouldn't have to.”

That puts the case squarely at the intersection of military discipline and America's fiercely protected tradition of political speech.

A rare and highly public case

Military disciplinary matters are often handled away from the public spotlight. Watson's case is different because his protests, arrests and political statements have all taken place publicly — and because Article 88 is rarely used.

His lawyers believe Watson may be among the first officers of his rank to face such charges under the provision.

The outcome could therefore have significance beyond one officer and one political protest.

At its heart is a difficult question for Trump's America: when a military officer believes the commander-in-chief is dangerously wrong, does the uniform require silence — or can conscience still speak?

Advertisement

SOURCE

Mixed in this is the fact that the man is a US citizen and is therefore entited to freedom of speech.

Thick skin. So thick.

Never gets angry at nothing.

Hardly ever thinks about Rosie O'Donnell. 😘

No image preview

2,541 个心情 · 422 次分享 | Donald J. Trump responds to Hillary...

Donald J. Trump responds to Hillary Clinton's criticism that he has "very thin skin" http://cnn.it/1Zkv22G

alligators 🦎 are always asking Trump what kind of moisturizer he uses

I assume he knew where his brazenness would take him. And that he read the applicable UCMJ articles that restricted public freedom of speech for folks in uniform. If he hadn't read it, he's a moron. And if he had, then, he's getting his wish to be a martyr.

Whichever applies, as a major, he's pretty close to 20-year retirement. Kiss that goodbye. Pretty stupid. Should have confined his views to "happy hour" talk, if he needed to be vocal about a subject no doubt many others harbored -- but were smart enough to internalize publicly.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.