We all know how Donald Trump can't stand when a clip is edited. So why did he post this of King Charles seeming to shrug and walk away when someone faints in front of him? In reality he went to check on them and stayed with them while they received medical attention, he just edited that out.

There's only one thing for it and that's a $10 billion law suit.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2z9n8ew49o

His Majesty King Charles, in whose royal breast there ought surely to reside some proper measure of patience, should answer Mr. Trump in such fashion as the fellow’s conduct merits, and, with the dignified indifference becoming a sovereign, consign the fevered utterances of that most disagreeable colonial to the dustbin of irrelevance.

No, not US$10 billion; make it US$1 trillion.

19 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

His Majesty King Charles, in whose royal breast there ought surely to reside some proper measure of patience, should answer Mr. Trump in such fashion as the fellow’s conduct merits, and, with the dignified indifference becoming a sovereign, consign the fevered utterances of that most disagreeable colonial to the dustbin of irrelevance.

Frankly I doubt that His Majesty could care less, like most of us, what the buffoon sitting in what is left of The White House pours out.

And those whose opinions are likely to have their opinions formed by his social media drivelling, well they are beyond help!

he should beg trump to just wait out his terrorist loving, jew hating government

2 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

he should beg trump to just wait out his terrorist loving, jew hating government

Troll. You bring nothing to any thread. Just a troll.

3 hours ago, josephbloggs said:

Troll. You bring nothing to any thread. Just a troll.

got it. you deny that the uk now supports terrorists. you and your ilk should be happy

israel should cut you guys off from intelligence and tech

1 hour ago, Yagoda said:

got it. you deny that the uk now supports terrorists. you and your ilk should be happy

israel should cut you guys off from intelligence and tech

I don't think the UK supports terrorists.

Although it's population is being replaced by people who appear to be terrorists.

Did you know Australia provided more Hamas/ISIS fighters than it has in the Australian forces.

46 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

I don't think the UK supports terrorists.

Although it's population is being replaced by people who appear to be terrorists.

Did you know Australia provided more Hamas/ISIS fighters than it has in the Australian forces.

Australia has nearly 100,000 active and reserve personnel in the ADF, so your statement is pure fabrication. Why post?..

Would it be ok if he paid in crypto?

18 minutes ago, couchpotato said:

Australia has nearly 100,000 active and reserve personnel in the ADF, so your statement is pure fabrication. Why post?..

Are they fighters?

What war was it.

The King does not personally sue for defamation. By long-standing constitutional convention, the monarch does not bring personal litigation for reputational harm, it is seen as incompatible with being above politics, particularly the vitriolic bipartisan scum he now sees across the pond. Besides, the BBC is a publicly-funded broadcaster bound by impartiality and editing standards, while a Truth Social montage is presented as partisan political messaging with no editorial standards whatsoever, and whoever laps up the garbage of Truth Social says more about the reader than the source.

Gotta wonder what brought on this edited video clip designed to make King Charles look bad? Trump seemed to like Charles and was an admirer of the Monarchy.

Charles had been critised widely for not speaking up against Trump's threat to annex Canada, since Charles is also King of Canada and therefore the country's Head of State. Perhaps he sent Trump a private, first-person diplomatic correspondence about that, maybe like an aide-memoire, and this is Trump's response?

Otherwise it's just more juvenile postings by a mercurial, perhaps insane, Trump.

If Trump had the same Kangaroo Court judge and jury as he did in the E Carroll case Charlie would definitely win !

No, of course not. 😄

2 hours ago, Yagoda said:

got it. you deny that the uk now supports terrorists. you and your ilk should be happy

israel should cut you guys off from intelligence and tech

Of course you don't get it, you don't even get it that the king isn't head of government in the UK.

8 minutes ago, ronnie50 said:

Gotta wonder what brought on this edited video clip designed to make King Charles look bad? Trump seemed to like Charles and was an admirer of the Monarchy.

Because Trump's brain is mush, like mushy peas, and he's now at the level that he doesn't recognize people any more.

1 hour ago, BritManToo said:

Did you know Australia provided more Hamas/ISIS fighters than it has in the Australian forces.

BS.

From AI

The Numbers

• Extremist Fighters: Australian security and government agencies estimate that roughly 200 to 230 Australians traveled overseas to support or fight for extremist groups like ISIS in Iraq and Syria over the course of the conflict. [1, 2]

• Australian Defence Force (ADF): The official military of Australia has approximately 59,000 full-time active-duty personnel and over 33,000 active reservists. [1]

The ADF has 58,909 full-time active-duty personnel and 33,269 active reservists,

30 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

Are they fighters?

What war was it.

You post some absolutely asinine stuff at times.🤒

6 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

BS.

From AI

The Numbers

• Extremist Fighters: Australian security and government agencies estimate that roughly 200 to 230 Australians traveled overseas to support or fight for extremist groups like ISIS in Iraq and Syria over the course of the conflict. [1, 2]

• Australian Defence Force (ADF): The official military of Australia has approximately 59,000 full-time active-duty personnel and over 33,000 active reservists. [1]

The ADF has 58,909 full-time active-duty personnel and 33,269 active reservists,

You're right with your numbers, but not your question.

The ADF were never really fighters, they are currently cosplayers.

(Obviously you could include ADF deaths when there were no mass immigrant Muslims in Australia (before 2015), which will boost your numbers Iraq 17,000 deployed, 5 deaths, Afghanistan 40,000 deployed, 41 dead .... not that much fighting then)

I was posting about fighters

Australians and ISIS

• Death Toll: Australian authorities and foreign minister statements from 2015 indicated that at least 40, and potentially up to 43, Australians had died fighting for the Islamic State (ISIS) in Syria and Iraq. [1]

• Overall Numbers: Intelligence estimates noted that roughly 220 Australians traveled to the conflict zones in Syria and Iraq to join extremist groups from 2012 onward. [1]

Edited 3 hours ago3 hr by BritManToo

12 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

You're right with your numbers, but not your question.

What question of mine are you referring to?

I never asked a question in my post on this topic.

All I posted was the letters "BS" and an AI quote!

Edited 3 hours ago3 hr by scottiejohn