Have You Bought From Coco?

[Charma]

You might not be the one who started the threads then, sorry for that missunderstanding, but you sure seem to be the speaker for coco in threads before. I cant be the only one that made the connection "charma=coco". Not stop the game and post real facts. Why do you only run around in circels, using my posts as it was the main thing to judge and grade me, and still dont answer anything!

So having got it wrong in the last thread, you now post another "misunderstanding". Perhaps you could point out where I am a speaker for Coco.

I confess i already know much more about coco than i first said. What this thread have shown so far, and once igain, for the last time, i challenge you to change that, is that also this new assosiation seems to be same kind of crap.

So you now say that you know more about Coco but decided not to mentuion this. You would prefer me to post on this!

Prove me wrong, please.

I stop posting in this thread now, i think this is completely pointless and leading nowere.

Thank god

But charma, in your next post, can you stick to the subject please? I think nobody is the least bit interrested in me so leave your comments. You dont have to say im out of facts. You just have to prove you have facts yourself, and bring them up.

I have been trying to stick to the subject. Please (I will ask again) READ THE TITLE OF THE THREAD. The reason I have had to deal with your comments is because you have decided again and again to post defamatory remarks about this association and about me. You have done this without the least thought for the consequences and without any knowledge about them or me.

Anyone with a genuine interest in this matter (i.e. people who bought houses from Coco) is free to contact the ACI and find out for themselves what is happening.

Edited September 26, 2007 by Charma

[mattias33]

You might not be the one who started the threads then, sorry for that missunderstanding, but you sure seem to be the speaker for coco in threads before. I cant be the only one that made the connection "charma=coco". Not stop the game and post real facts. Why do you only run around in circels, using my posts as it was the main thing to judge and grade me, and still dont answer anything!

So having got it wrong in the last thread, you now post another "misunderstanding". Perhaps you could point out where I am a speaker for Coco.

I confess i already know much more about coco than i first said. What this thread have shown so far, and once igain, for the last time, i challenge you to change that, is that also this new assosiation seems to be same kind of crap.

So you now say that you know more about Coco but decided not to mentuion this. You would prefer me to post on this!

Prove me wrong, please.

I stop posting in this thread now, i think this is completely pointless and leading nowere.

Thank god

But charma, in your next post, can you stick to the subject please? I think nobody is the least bit interrested in me so leave your comments. You dont have to say im out of facts. You just have to prove you have facts yourself, and bring them up.

I have been trying to stick to the subject. Please (I will ask again) READ THE TITLE OF THE THREAD. The reason I have had to deal with your comments is because you have decided again and again to post defamatory remarks about this association and about me. You have done this without the least thought for the consequences and without any knowledge about them or me.

Anyone with a genuine interest in this matter (i.e. people who bought houses from Coco) is free to contact the ACI and find out for themselves what is happening.

Wow, half a page this time. As usual only about my post. Assosiation of coco is not worth talking about i guess..........

Lets give up.

[gusG]

IMHO...Charma = "CHARMER" = Damage Control. Didn't anyone see it. Say no more.

[GetBackJoJo]

So, Matius says.... If you are the least bit smart you start to bring a little serious information to this thread, but i guess thats to much to ask.

Wow. Pot calling kettle black, or what? Matius, have YOU got any serious info to post on this thread? Seems not.

Charma - my personal opinion is that CoCo's are not intentional scammers from the get-go... rather that Bruce and Alan are a cocky pair of jump starts who got way to big for there boots and buzzed off the prestige of 'we are CoCO'. The concept behind the Blues Bar for example was not revenue/profit - it was simply a fixed place where people could come and look at them. There is a reason those bar stools are so big. They were purchased with them in mind.

'Oooh. Theres the CoCo twins. How splendid they look.' At the risk of sounding childish - let me tel you now, that was the whole point in building that bar.

My guess is this. They ran out of investment (we all know that pretty much all of there ventures are funded by other peoples money) but they continued to develop for the hel_l of it, hoping they could somehow continue the dream of earning a wedge and looking great at the same time.

What is the logical step when you require crucial investment people? Im not sure.... but i would bet my last shilling that the logical step to take when you are skint and your development is on the verge of going bang is not to create an all singing, all dancing bloody gigantic festival.

You can imagine the conversation: 'Right mate. We are skint. We cant pay the suppliers, the builders are kicking off. The investers keep knocking on our door and we have no money for advertising. What shall we do?...... Sod it. Lets set up a festival, and knock them as well'.

Not intentional scammers, i dont think. Just a couple of bloody idiots. Its. As. Simple. As. That.

Anyway. I have no reason to post - im not involved. I just felt compeled to post something as Charma - I too was also accused by Matius of being ' a representative' at one point. I defended a visa run company, and in his eyes, im the bloody owner. I know how you feel mate.

Matius. You live in Samui for god's sake. Go and have a beer, get laid - christ, start a fight if you have to. Just please, go find something to do other than fish around this forum putting the world to rights. Its not your business - so why do you care so much all of the time? Why the 50,000 heated posts on subjects you are completley remote from?

Happy Bar One - go and fill your boots son. Thats after you have 'read the forum rules' of course. Must get your priorities in ship shape mate!!

[mattias33]

So, Matius says.... If you are the least bit smart you start to bring a little serious information to this thread, but i guess thats to much to ask.

Wow. Pot calling kettle black, or what? Matius, have YOU got any serious info to post on this thread? Seems not.

Charma - my personal opinion is that CoCo's are not intentional scammers from the get-go... rather that Bruce and Alan are a cocky pair of jump starts who got way to big for there boots and buzzed off the prestige of 'we are CoCO'. The concept behind the Blues Bar for example was not revenue/profit - it was simply a fixed place where people could come and look at them. There is a reason those bar stools are so big. They were purchased with them in mind.

'Oooh. Theres the CoCo twins. How splendid they look.' At the risk of sounding childish - let me tel you now, that was the whole point in building that bar.

My guess is this. They ran out of investment (we all know that pretty much all of there ventures are funded by other peoples money) but they continued to develop for the hel_l of it, hoping they could somehow continue the dream of earning a wedge and looking great at the same time.

What is the logical step when you require crucial investment people? Im not sure.... but i would bet my last shilling that the logical step to take when you are skint and your development is on the verge of going bang is not to create an all singing, all dancing bloody gigantic festival.

You can imagine the conversation: 'Right mate. We are skint. We cant pay the suppliers, the builders are kicking off. The investers keep knocking on our door and we have no money for advertising. What shall we do?...... Sod it. Lets set up a festival, and knock them as well'.

Not intentional scammers, i dont think. Just a couple of bloody idiots. Its. As. Simple. As. That.

Anyway. I have no reason to post - im not involved. I just felt compeled to post something as Charma - I too was also accused by Matius of being ' a representative' at one point. I defended a visa run company, and in his eyes, im the bloody owner. I know how you feel mate.

Matius. You live in Samui for god's sake. Go and have a beer, get laid - christ, start a fight if you have to. Just please, go find something to do other than fish around this forum putting the world to rights. Its not your business - so why do you care so much all of the time? Why the 50,000 heated posts on subjects you are completley remote from?

Happy Bar One - go and fill your boots son. Thats after you have 'read the forum rules' of course. Must get your priorities in ship shape mate!!

Well,well,well. "gojabojjajajja" (since you insist calling me "matius")crawled out from the shadow again. I was not in anyway trying to ditch charma the way i did with your visaruncompany, its not the same league. But i still dont like when people defend companies that obviosly hurt many people and will hurt many more.

AS for why i care much, and if i do or not have facts i suggest you keep your mouth shut since you dont know nr 1: how much money i lost with coco, and 2: how many friend i have that lost money with coco.

Having fun in samui is also nothing you have to tell me about, and as usual you go in the posts, trying to defend something, run out of arguments, and then attac me personaly. Pretty lame gajjabajja.

Now i did stop posting in the subject already, off course gajjabajja should come in and start something else off topic that has to be commented on, but i think you are the one that should stop. I tryed to ask some questions to begin with. Your points in attacing me personaly everytime i express an oppinion i totaly dont see, but keep it up if you want.

[sbk]

Well, since this thread is no longer in the realm of anything other than arguments and no new "facts' have been posted

///CLOSED///