The Swami Army

[camerata]

The Swami Army

Ven. Shravasti Dhammika

Almost no Buddhist monks today live the way the Buddha and his direct disciples did, although many like to think they do. The Buddha was a homeless wanderer, we Buddhist monks are, virtually without exception, permanently ensconced in comfortable, well-appointed monasteries where our every need and most of our wants are provided for by the surrounding community. I don't think there is anything wrong with this; things have changed since the 5th century BCE. But I do think we should stop pretending that we are something we're not. Yes, yes, I know that there are 'forest monasteries' but all the ones I've seen differed from the city monasteries only in that they were set in 'extensive grounds.'

If you want a glimpse of how the Buddha lived you have to spend time with wandering Hindu swamis. While empires have come and gone and civilizations have risen and fell these men (and a few women too) have wandered India's dusty paths without security and owning nothing more that what they can carry.. In the Buddha's time the main sects of wandering swamis were the Ajivakas, the Niganthas (Jains), the Mundasavakas (the Shaven Ones), the Jatilas (Matted-hair Ones), the Paribbajakas (Wanderers), the Magandikas, the Tedandikas (Those of the Triple Staff), the Aviruddhakas (The Passive Ones), the Gotamakas (The Disciples of Gotama, not the Buddha) and the Devadhammaikas (God's Way, A.III, 276). Today there are many more; the Khannapathas, Naga Babbas, Aghoris, Kapalikas, Avidhutas to name but a few.

The Buddha's reminiscence about the period in his life when he practiced self-mortification suggest that he studied and practiced with swamis other than Uddaka Ramaputta and Alara Kalama. He said he 'pulled out his hair and beard' and 'had compassion even for a drop of water' exactly the things Jain monks do even today. When he said '...sakam yeva sudam muttakarisam aharemi' one is reminded of the more revolting Aghori practices (M.I,79).

I have always found the swamis I have met to be simple, devote, good-natured men (except Aghoris who tend to be psychopaths) who treasure the freedom that life on the open road offers them. Of course there are plenty of rogues too but these are balanced by those who have genuine and sometimes very considerable spiritual attainments.

On my way to Gangotri and Gomuk a few years back I passed and sometimes travelled for a few days with several bands of swamis making the pilgrimage. All of them were shoeless and owned nothing more than a staff, robes and what they could fit into a shoulder bag. They had no supplies but ate only what they begged for on the way. Many of these swamis told me that they spend the winter hanging around village or town temples or famous pilgrimage sites and as the summer comes on they make their way up into the mountains. There they spend spring and summer doing the rounds of sacred places, find a strategically situated place near a temple where they can easily get alms, build themselves a hut in a forest near a village or find themselves a good cave. Contrary to popular opinion, a good number of these swamis are quite learned and have regular meditation or devotional practices, although it is true that there are many lay-abouts and conmen too. In short, they are just like the Buddhist sangha.

But what I have often found amongst wandering swamis which is rare in the Buddhist sangha is a strong sense of fellow-feeling. They extend an almost immediate welcome to anyone they perceive to be another swami. Burmese monks will not bow to a Western monk senior to them or even return a greeting with anything more than a grunt. Thais are the same although they will at least smile back. And being of a different race is not the only barrier either.. In Burma and Thailand monks of one sect will not stay in nor are they welcome in, the monasteries of a different sect. Even a slightly different practice of the Vinaya will evoke frowns or comments of disapproval.

'Stuck up' is not a term that immediately comes to mind when thinking about Hindu wanderers. They have a kind of camaraderie that grows out of shared hardship, of always being at the bottom of the heap. When they find out that you are of a different sect, as I always am to them, they are usually genuinly interested in knowing what you practice and believe. And as long as you state your position gently, the conversation remains cordial. When I say I am a follower of 'Bhagawan Buddha' this is almost always followed by a good-natured chorus of 'Buddhang Saranang Gachchami.' I feel a bit of a fake staying with or travelling with these men because I always have my passport and my return air ticket to Singapore in my bag. But that never seems to worry them – they accept you as you are, treat you as one of their own for as long as you are with them and wish you well when you go.

Source: Lankaweb.

[Bangyai]

Have you thought of studying zen in Japan. A friend did and found it a very illuminating experience. He even introduced me to a zen teacher of his who came over from Canada to help spread the teachings. Although it was all a bit much for me I have to say I have never met anyone who radiated such a calming aura.

[bankei]

I've always liked Dhammika's writings and he has made some good points, but a few generalisations too.

There may be some Burmese monks that refuse to bow to more senior western monks, but surely not all Burmese monks are like this. Similar for the Thai monks. I have seen Thai's paying their respects to a western monk many times.

Thai monks of one nikaya can also, and do, stay at Wats of the other nikaya - although they probably would not stay there for long periods - it is still possible and I have even travelled with monks of the Dhammayut nikaya and stayed in Mahanikaya Wats - strict vinaya observings Wat too.

Bankei

[Brucenkhamen]

Though it's not the main point of the article I'm not sure where he gets his information to justify "In Burma and Thailand monks of one sect will not stay in nor are they welcome in, the monasteries of a different sect".

At the Dhammayut Wat I ordained at there were a couple of Mahanikaya monks who stayed there for several months.

At the times I've been at Wat Pah Nanachaat there always seems to be a couple of Dhammayut or Burmese ordained monks there.

[sabaijai]

He also neglected to mention thudong monks in Thailand, who wander about with only a krot (shelter umbrella) and the 8 requisites.

[Samuian]

don't fall in the trap and get stuck by the "clubs membership"... it's the vehicle, the means of "transport", not the brand!

[sabaijai]

don't fall in the trap and get stuck by the "clubs membership"... it's the vehicle, the means of "transport", not the brand!

The vehicle is the brand. Even the vehicle is a trap, once it's use is complete. Till then, it's a long way to hitchhike.