Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi,

We had one guy here that have a permit of stay 365days based on work. We had to cancel his WP but felt that we wanted to help the guy with his visa. We sent our "visa specialist sectary" and him to immigration and got the information from a "high ranking officer" that he could still use his Permit of stay until it expires, no need for any changes even without the WP. This was totally new for me and i feel i need to listen if some one else here have heard anything like this before.

Posted

On the basis that he holds a 12 month extension of stay based on employment issued by Thai immigration (is not a visa), he has to leave the country on the day his employment ends, or go to immigration and obtain a 7 day extension. Otherwise he will be on overstay.

Posted

The only way he would be legally allowed to remain more than 7 days after the cancellation of his WP would be if he was on a non immigrant visa as opposed to an extension based upon his WP.

Posted

Agreed, if his original non-immigrant visa was multiple-entry and is still valid he can stay until it expires. He probably would need to leave the country and return to get a current 90 day permission to stay stamp. If on an extension of stay based on working, then sorry - no can do!

Posted

Not sure if this is the case here of course, but I have observed that people sometimes misunderstand when an extension of stay is based on WP.

Example:

Person is married to a Thai, extends stay by using the 40K domestic income, which requires to show the WP, but the extension is actually based on spouse. In such a case he can stay until the end of the current permit.

opalhort

Posted

This guy have a Non Imm-B and got a extension of stay for one year. Our visa sectary though this was odd too but was ensured that it was no problems "as long as he kept him self out of trouble."

Yesterday i got the information that immigration does NOT run their databases together. So the border immigrant officer will not know that the WP have been cancelled and therefore not issue any overstay fine when he leaves the country.

Posted

But he is very likely to asked why he does not have a re-entry permit at the exit point, because without that he will loose his extension of stay, - then the web unravels and he has to return to his immigration office to pay fine and obtain a stamp in his passport from them before being allowed to exit the country. It just happened this week to another poster.

Posted
Re-entry permit? The guy is still in thailand and have no intention to leave the country.

He is on overstay and has to leave the country. Right now he is illegaly staying in the country.

Immigration might ask him why he doesn't have a re-entry permit as when he leaves his permission to stay will end.

Posted

As said at some point he must leave the country as he no longer has a way to extend his stay - Immigration officers try to help people who have forgotten to obtain re-entry permits and will point this out to him - if they find out he is not employed they will likely ask when that employment ended and require he have a stamp indication of that end of employment in his passport prior to leaving. Will everyone be asked? I suspect not; but anyone being asked appears to be a recent thing.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...