Jump to content

High-Speed Rail Carries High Price Tag: Thailand


Recommended Posts

Posted

Is this the most badly written article in the history of journalism?

I fail too see why this article, or the economist's opinion is wrong! Why don't you explain what you mean!

It starts by talking about consensus, then states clearly that there is no consensus. There is no beginning middle or conclusion, the tenses give no context to the time frames of this consensus.

then it leads into the costs of maintenance as being something that brings disheartening issues, as though one should expect to get a train network that needs no maintenance?????

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

"we should first build double-track railroads before thinking about high-speed trains" says Nakorn somebody, saying about the only sensible thing in the hole article.

As I keep saying whenever this topic comes up, and as any sane transport planner would say, Thailand needs only to upgrade to normal express train standard with double tracks, of the kind that has existed in Europe for about a century. At the moment, it has a railway system which runs at about the speed of the mid-Victorian railways.

Investing in high-speed trains would to be miss out the stage of development that is really needed in order to create an absurdly over-the-top system --- and probably a financially failed system -- in relation to Thailand's real needs.

Absolutely right! Now I do need in between 16 and 18hours to travel from Hat Yai to Bangkok. A regular, "D-Zug", not the fast "Intercity" in Germany does it in 9 hours. If the Thai government just would redo the current tracks to a regular standard and for sure have two tracks instead of one, everything would be fine, and the trains would finally stop to rattle. And in a couple of years Thailand would be able to run even faster trains using the newly updated tracks.

Posted

Relocate cities and towns!!!! What planet are these people on?

Would be easier to just route the train through towns, as they do in Europe.

Of course this is what would happen. The article fails to consider that European rail has a 150 year history, maybe more. Rail in Thailand is only post-war. The article is full of politics and devoid of any facts about HSR.

Posted

Oo but i thought you guys we're going down to High Speed rails Mart and getting a big discount?

Id rather fly upside down in an open cockpit plane then get on a Chinese made train. I mean look at this crap boxes you call trains already and you want to go hi tech? Why dont you try fixing the crap we already have in the city.

Do we really need disrespectful posts like these? At least have a bit of class, man!

  • Like 1
Posted

Is this the most badly written article in the history of journalism?

I fail too see why this article, or the economist's opinion is wrong! Why don't you explain what you mean!

It starts by talking about consensus, then states clearly that there is no consensus. There is no beginning middle or conclusion, the tenses give no context to the time frames of this consensus.

then it leads into the costs of maintenance as being something that brings disheartening issues, as though one should expect to get a train network that needs no maintenance?????

Yes you are correct on your critique of this article. But this is the Nation, and so many articles are written in this way, and no, I doubt it is the "most badly written"piece of journalism. At least, give it until Tuesday I am sure this will be bested by then.
Posted

Relocate cities and towns!!!! What planet are these people on?

I have 43 years of Engineering and some included railway construction. This really is the stupidest thing...nearly...I have ever heard. Gotta move towns and cities!!!

Wow and this guy has some credentials. Wonder who he is trying to scare and why.

Posted

Of course this is what would happen. The article fails to consider that European rail has a 150 year history, maybe more. Rail in Thailand is only post-war. The article is full of politics and devoid of any facts about HSR.

"only post-war" ?

Pre first-world-war, to be more correct. The first line (Bangkok-Ayuttaya) dates back to 1892. Choo choo ! rolleyes.gif

Posted

"we should first build double-track railroads before thinking about high-speed trains" says Nakorn somebody, saying about the only sensible thing in the hole article.

As I keep saying whenever this topic comes up, and as any sane transport planner would say, Thailand needs only to upgrade to normal express train standard with double tracks, of the kind that has existed in Europe for about a century. At the moment, it has a railway system which runs at about the speed of the mid-Victorian railways.

Investing in high-speed trains would to be miss out the stage of development that is really needed in order to create an absurdly over-the-top system --- and probably a financially failed system -- in relation to Thailand's real needs.

Absolutely right! Now I do need in between 16 and 18hours to travel from Hat Yai to Bangkok. A regular, "D-Zug", not the fast "Intercity" in Germany does it in 9 hours. If the Thai government just would redo the current tracks to a regular standard and for sure have two tracks instead of one, everything would be fine, and the trains would finally stop to rattle. And in a couple of years Thailand would be able to run even faster trains using the newly updated tracks.

Not aware that high speed trains are freight trains....need to do both and good double track full gauge rail in the flat lands can go pretty quick.

Posted (edited)

With regard to the cities aspect, if the station locations are not in the centers or near the centers of existing cities/towns, the project will fail. Look at Taiwan's HSR. Except for Taipei and Kaoshiung, the Taiwnanese chose to build the intermediate stations in greenfield locations well outside cities. Even in Taichung, with more than 2.5 million, the HSR station is way out of town and you have to take a special bus to the center of the city. As a result, there is substantial inefficiencies and certainly lost ridership.

Luckily (or perhaps not), the Japanese consultants who undertook the pre-feasibility study for the Chiang Mai line realize this and analyzed the potential to use existing station areas for HSR station development, with most getting a green light. If the government goes through with this, hopefully this important fact is not lost in translation.

Edited by planr
Posted

hahaha funny... looking for foreign money and once it is build, they will just take over.... what about that german company that never got paid more than 20 years ago to make a highway or was it a part of the old airport here in thailand ?

why would any other country invest in such projects, where corruption money to be collected, costs to be tripple for the "right" reasons, is more important than anything else ?

why in so many years of living here or comming here for hollidays, there is no rail link from the airport directly to, let's say pattaya for one... or other (past) "top" tourist destinations

BINGO! How stupid do they want the tourists (and the lo-so's) to be? Perhaps we shall know more in the by and by.

Posted (edited)

It would seem that the Lao are the only ones who realize that encouraging the Chinese to build roads in your direction is a bad idea.

Edited by metisdead
: Font reset to default forum font and color.
  • Like 1
Posted
Since the trains will run at high speed, the risk of accidents and serious damage to life and property is also high, so the cost for the system is also high, as mechanical parts must be subjected to a very high standard.

"Recognising this fact, those who were initially enthusiastic have become disheartened," Nakorn said.

A great little gem that basically lays bare the attitude of the Thai government and Thais, in general, to public safety.

Yes but all those things are known and already solved. The big problem will be to convince Thailand that they don't have to invent the wheel it has been done for thousands of years.

Posted (edited)

Relocate cities and towns!!!! What planet are these people on?

And.........every Rai of land within 1 km either side of the bullet trains proposed track will be bought under a mandatory purchase scheme by ....the Shiniwatra's.

If the Government would just stamp all over the budgeted costs of 'graft' which have been officially stated as 30% of Government budgets then the bullet train would only cost 2/3 rds of the currently proposed price..a bargain!

Ummmm... you'll find that all the land next to waterways, the land / adjacent land the railways run through, military land, and major highways / adjacent land are already owned by someone else.

Edited by scotbeve
Posted

Well I guess it will take YEARSSSSSSSSSSSSS before to see any tracks for the high speed train ... Why Thailand didnt think about the same idea of producing spare parts for MRT or BTS ? The high speed technology in Europe specially in France with the TGV is probably the best and the most expensive .... you cannot buy a rolls royce at a price of a toyota sorry .

Toyota - in your dreams, they are going Chinese. Check out the worst car in the world @

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94HTIueOuDQ

Very good - except the car in this video is apparently Australian! '1979 Holden Commodore'. maybe the 'Chinese car crash test' indicated that the test was done in China? There again maybe not because the wall survived!

The original site had a comment that the car resembled a Commodore. Any chance that a Chinese (or any asian) company would rip-off a design and then build it badly?

Do you remember the hoo-ha over Telstra paying a huge amount of money for their new logo, now appearing on a Thai bank?

Posted

With regard to the cities aspect, if the station locations are not in the centers or near the centers of existing cities/towns, the project will fail. Look at Taiwan's HSR. Except for Taipei and Kaoshiung, the Taiwnanese chose to build the intermediate stations in greenfield locations well outside cities. Even in Taichung, with more than 2.5 million, the HSR station is way out of town and you have to take a special bus to the center of the city. As a result, there is substantial inefficiencies and certainly lost ridership.

Luckily (or perhaps not), the Japanese consultants who undertook the pre-feasibility study for the Chiang Mai line realize this and analyzed the potential to use existing station areas for HSR station development, with most getting a green light. If the government goes through with this, hopefully this important fact is not lost in translation.

Just about every major regional city in Thailand has ring roads that are sometimes only 5 or 10 km from the centre of the downtown, but largely out in the countryside. The stations only need to be 5 to 10 km from downtown. Of course, this needs a bit of integrated thinking to put a bus station nearby, there will inevitably be myriad songtaews and tuuk tuuks going to the stations also. There is absolutely no reason why the lines can't skirt along side the existing main roads from city to city, where this idiocy about moving cities comes from god only knows????

Posted

My post is concerned about possible corruption with the huge sums of money projects like this will cost

It is very interesting to see 'The Government' and 'Chiang Mai' appear together in articles about infrastructure projects.

A link was provided a while ago about the association between 2 powerful Chiang Mai families. The Shinawatras and Buranupakorns. (am I allowed to repeat the link?)

http://www.chiangmainews.com/ecmn/viewfa.php?id=3432

2 points in the interview included in the link interested me:

1 - he mentions an approach to Abhisit for investment

There are great expectations from this government; they are very fast at problem solving. I talked to Abhisit [Vejjajiva], but was ignored. Politics influences development. In October this year, the first budget of 9 billion will arrive to Chiang Mai.

So Abhisit didn't come to Chiang Mai with an open wallet. A state of affairs which this government has 'rectified'

2 - he is asked - What infrastructure projects are you currently working on?

A ring road from Hang Dong to go around to Mae Rim, through Saraphee and Sankampaeng, totalling 58 kilometres,

We will be adding underpasses to all intersections along the third ring road, I think there are six or seven locations, and this will cost three billion baht.

Another project we are working on is to complete the road which runs parallel to the train tracks from Chiang Mai to Lamphun.

His comment "My job is not to build these things, but to pitch the ideas to the government and get budgeting approval." doesn't sound too difficult!

Another exciting project is to build a shortcut to Mae Hong Son via a tunnel, or multiple tunnels. It will require tens of billions.

A project which PM Yingluck Shinawatra is very excited about is a high speed train between Bangkok and Chiang Mai.

"

So his friends are now in Government and money is flowing North. Is there the possibility that all the investment isn't going to end up in the projects?

Posted

Well I guess it will take YEARSSSSSSSSSSSSS before to see any tracks for the high speed train ... Why Thailand didnt think about the same idea of producing spare parts for MRT or BTS ? The high speed technology in Europe specially in France with the TGV is probably the best and the most expensive .... you cannot buy a rolls royce at a price of a toyota sorry .

Toyota - in your dreams, they are going Chinese. Check out the worst car in the world @

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94HTIueOuDQ

Looking at the you tube clip is see it was 1992 car so a little unfair comparison .....
Posted

Well I guess it will take YEARSSSSSSSSSSSSS before to see any tracks for the high speed train ... Why Thailand didnt think about the same idea of producing spare parts for MRT or BTS ? The high speed technology in Europe specially in France with the TGV is probably the best and the most expensive .... you cannot buy a rolls royce at a price of a toyota sorry .

Toyota - in your dreams, they are going Chinese. Check out the worst car in the world @

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94HTIueOuDQ

w00t.gif Thank you for the link, shocking.sad.png

Yeah scary, but the tests in that video are 30 years old, at least. Technology has advance somewhat since them. And the worst car on the video, Holden Commodore, was Australian, not Chinese.

Posted

Relocate cities and towns!!!! What planet are these people on?

I have 43 years of Engineering and some included railway construction. This really is the stupidest thing...nearly...I have ever heard. Gotta move towns and cities!!!

Wow and this guy has some credentials. Wonder who he is trying to scare and why.

Agreed. But this sort of posturing is not limited to Thailand. The biggest opponents are the obvious ones: other transport industries - bus and air, possibly with the trucking industry thrown in for good measure. The same issues occur in Australia, USA, South America and Africa.

Posted

Of course this is what would happen. The article fails to consider that European rail has a 150 year history, maybe more. Rail in Thailand is only post-war. The article is full of politics and devoid of any facts about HSR.

"only post-war" ?

Pre first-world-war, to be more correct. The first line (Bangkok-Ayuttaya) dates back to 1892. Choo choo ! rolleyes.gif

Fair point, although my books state 1893 as the first service. However, I was thinking of mass-transit. The Ayutthaya line hardly qualifies. My point is that Thailand is being compared with countries with 150 years experience in moving a significant proportion of their population around their country by rail.

But you are technically correct. There were regular passenger services in Thailand before 1900. Thanks to King Rama V and his foresight for a modern country.

Posted

With regard to the cities aspect, if the station locations are not in the centers or near the centers of existing cities/towns, the project will fail. Look at Taiwan's HSR. Except for Taipei and Kaoshiung, the Taiwnanese chose to build the intermediate stations in greenfield locations well outside cities. Even in Taichung, with more than 2.5 million, the HSR station is way out of town and you have to take a special bus to the center of the city. As a result, there is substantial inefficiencies and certainly lost ridership.

Luckily (or perhaps not), the Japanese consultants who undertook the pre-feasibility study for the Chiang Mai line realize this and analyzed the potential to use existing station areas for HSR station development, with most getting a green light. If the government goes through with this, hopefully this important fact is not lost in translation.

You are generally correct. Historically, HSR shadows established rail corridors. It is reasonable to suggest that the HSR will follow closely the network operated by State Rail of Thailand. Diversions to serve nearby major tourist and population centers excepted.

Posted

Of course this is what would happen. The article fails to consider that European rail has a 150 year history, maybe more. Rail in Thailand is only post-war. The article is full of politics and devoid of any facts about HSR.

"only post-war" ?

Pre first-world-war, to be more correct. The first line (Bangkok-Ayuttaya) dates back to 1892. Choo choo ! rolleyes.gif

Fair point, although my books state 1893 as the first service. However, I was thinking of mass-transit. The Ayutthaya line hardly qualifies. My point is that Thailand is being compared with countries with 150 years experience in moving a significant proportion of their population around their country by rail.

But you are technically correct. There were regular passenger services in Thailand before 1900. Thanks to King Rama V and his foresight for a modern country.

Shame they don't appear to have invested much in it since that time.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Of course this is what would happen. The article fails to consider that European rail has a 150 year history, maybe more. Rail in Thailand is only post-war. The article is full of politics and devoid of any facts about HSR.

"only post-war" ?

Pre first-world-war, to be more correct. The first line (Bangkok-Ayuttaya) dates back to 1892. Choo choo ! rolleyes.gif

Fair point, although my books state 1893 as the first service. However, I was thinking of mass-transit. The Ayutthaya line hardly qualifies. My point is that Thailand is being compared with countries with 150 years experience in moving a significant proportion of their population around their country by rail.

But you are technically correct. There were regular passenger services in Thailand before 1900. Thanks to King Rama V and his foresight for a modern country.

I'm a bit confused here. The Royal Railway network got off the ground in the 1890s as did electrified tram service in Bangkok

What has Thailand missed in the last... 120 years... besides failing to continually invest and upgrade the urban and inter-urban networks?

Edited by planr
Posted

My post is concerned about possible corruption with the huge sums of money projects like this will cost

It is very interesting to see 'The Government' and 'Chiang Mai' appear together in articles about infrastructure projects.

A link was provided a while ago about the association between 2 powerful Chiang Mai families. The Shinawatras and Buranupakorns. (am I allowed to repeat the link?)

http://www.chiangmai...wfa.php?id=3432

2 points in the interview included in the link interested me:

1 - he mentions an approach to Abhisit for investment

There are great expectations from this government; they are very fast at problem solving. I talked to Abhisit [Vejjajiva], but was ignored. Politics influences development. In October this year, the first budget of 9 billion will arrive to Chiang Mai.

So Abhisit didn't come to Chiang Mai with an open wallet. A state of affairs which this government has 'rectified'

2 - he is asked - What infrastructure projects are you currently working on?

A ring road from Hang Dong to go around to Mae Rim, through Saraphee and Sankampaeng, totalling 58 kilometres,

We will be adding underpasses to all intersections along the third ring road, I think there are six or seven locations, and this will cost three billion baht.

Another project we are working on is to complete the road which runs parallel to the train tracks from Chiang Mai to Lamphun.

His comment "My job is not to build these things, but to pitch the ideas to the government and get budgeting approval." doesn't sound too difficult!

Another exciting project is to build a shortcut to Mae Hong Son via a tunnel, or multiple tunnels. It will require tens of billions.

A project which PM Yingluck Shinawatra is very excited about is a high speed train between Bangkok and Chiang Mai.

"

So his friends are now in Government and money is flowing North. Is there the possibility that all the investment isn't going to end up in the projects?

You were joking when you said " possible corruption" I hope

If it wasn't the home of the Shinawatra clan is the economic value of a separate high speed train coming to Chiang Mai worth the cost.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Topics

  • Latest posts...

    1. 5

      Thailand Live Wednesday 20 November 2024

    2. 5

      Thai Tesla driver admits reckless driving after argument - video

    3. 20

      Tourist Hits Pattaya Street Sweeper, Attempts to Flee but is Captured by Bystanders

    4. 84

      New Alcohol Control Bill Nearly Finalised; Set for December House Vote

    5. 0

      UK Faces Diplomatic Tightrope Amid Potential Trade War

    6. 0

      Tragedy and Justice: Life Sentence for Hate Crime in California

    7. 0

      Employers Warn of Job Losses as Budget Sparks Offshoring Fears

    8. 0

      Dangerous Russian Fertiliser Dumped in North Sea Off Norfolk Coast

  • Popular in The Pub


×
×
  • Create New...