maidu Posted October 13, 2012 Share Posted October 13, 2012 Besides the other event we are all anxiously waiting for... what's that, my first three-some? The second coming of Saint Bob? .... the sequel to 'The Rake and the Hoe'? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellodolly Posted October 13, 2012 Share Posted October 13, 2012 Chalerm is Thaksin's enforcer, cleaner and henchman all rolled into one. He is loyal to a fault. Why would the boss dispense of his MVP? You're right, up to a point. However, there are 2 reasons T might dispose of Chalerm. One is if Chalerm goes deeper down the doo doo path of making silly comments regarding law enforcement issues. You would think that even Thaksin, with his propensity for lying and making wild claims, would eventually see Chalerm as a drawback in that dept. Or maybe not, as there may be no point too low for such men. The other is if Chalerm makes a power grab which is not sanctioned by higher ups. He could put him with Jutaporn and have a matched set for the mantle on his fire place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellodolly Posted October 13, 2012 Share Posted October 13, 2012 Kinda like a game of poker with marked cards. You exchange the deck for another deck of marked cards and you still get one winner and a lot of losers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sunshine51 Posted October 13, 2012 Share Posted October 13, 2012 Ahhhhh...Good point Watson...Good point. However my dear lad...the real question is this... Will the next reshuffle survive Chalerm? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metisdead Posted October 14, 2012 Share Posted October 14, 2012 Mentioning it would put me in violation of TV rule #2. Don't even think about making veiled speculation or insinuations either! Do it again at your own risk. A post has been removed due to possible violation of copyright and non compliance of fair use. It is generally accepted, but not written into law, that quoting the first two or three sentences of an article and giving a link to the source is considered “fair use” and not a violation of copyright. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvilDrSomkid Posted October 14, 2012 Share Posted October 14, 2012 Mentioning it would put me in violation of TV rule #2. Don't even think about making veiled speculation or insinuations either! Do it again at your own risk. A post has been removed due to possible violation of copyright and non compliance of fair use. It is generally accepted, but not written into law, that quoting the first two or three sentences of an article and giving a link to the source is considered “fair use” and not a violation of copyright. Re. first line: Understood. I could not find the link to the original article. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrtoad Posted October 14, 2012 Share Posted October 14, 2012 Maybe Chalerm is not hitting his 90 day targets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now