Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Demolition Dispute Row Heats Up Between Court, Fine Arts Dept: Bangkok

Featured Replies

Demolition dispute row heats us between court, Fine Arts dept

Opas Bunlom

The Nation

30196682-01_big.JPG

Both sides have threatened legal action; top court to meet today

BANGKOK: -- The row between the Supreme Court and the Department of Fine Arts over the demolition of "historic" buildings in the court compound near Sanam Luang has turned nasty with the department threatening to sue and the court to countersue.

Sahawat Naenna, director-general of the DFA, yesterday called for an immediate halt to the demolition, which he said was clearly an illegal act because it was carried out without the department's permission, after submitting a written petition to Supreme Court President Pairoj Wayuparb and the Court of Justice.

The department could be accused of negligence if it took no action over the issue, he said.

The DFA had 8,000 historic sites awaiting registration while it was capable of registering about 100 each year. He did not say whether the buildings in the compound had been registered. "In this case, if the violation [of the DFA's classification of the buildings as historic sites] continues, the DFA has to abide by the law by taking the issue to court. However, no suit has been launched yet, as the DFA is waiting for a clear stance from the Supreme Court," he said.

The Court has reportedly called an urgent meeting for 9am today to discuss the issue, after learning of Sahawat's statement yesterday.

A high-ranking judicial source said senior judges deemed the department's stance and its statement as acts of intimidation and the statement as not entirely true. "The judiciary welcomes a suit from the DFA, which would be faced with a countersuit, likely on a charge of falsifying a statement," the source said.

Wirat Chinwinijul, secretary-general of the Court of Justice, said the demolition and subsequent construction would continue, as it had not received the DFA's written statement nor been given an order by the Supreme Court to stop the work.

The judiciary had not acted arbitrarily, as the demolition was carried out under an agreement brokered two years ago by then culture minister Niphit Intharasombat, who oversaw the department.

"If the demolition and the planned construction are suspended or halted, all documents acknowledging the agreement will need to be verified and presented," he said.

nationlogo.jpg

-- The Nation 2012-12-24

Should have hired the Firestone building demolishers then the building would be already flatened and no argumentstongue.png

Who was the architect, Stalin or Hitler?

It seems that the judiciary and the Government cannot agree on anything at all. Why all this BS when the reality is that a lot of BKK will be under water before very long?

A truly hideous example of fascist architecture and a perfect candidate for the wreckers' ball.

  • Author

CONTROVERSIAL PROJECT

Demolition plan 'approved 20 years ago'

Opas Boonlom,

Anuphan Chantana

The Nation

30196758-01_big.JPG

BANGKOK: -- The Fine Arts Department agreed to plans for the Supreme Court compound more than 20 years ago, so its opposition to the demolition of the buildings there now is unfounded, senior judges concluded yesterday.

A source said Supreme Court President Pairoj Wayuparb, who presided over the meeting, said there would be no responses from the judiciary to the Fine Arts Department. Most of the judges in the meeting deemed the department's stance as intimidating and inappropriate.

According to documents presented in the meeting, the department agreed with a 1990 Supreme Court plan to demolish all the buildings in the compound and construct new ones except the oldest one, the Court of Justice, which the Supreme Court intends to keep.

The Fine Arts Department has threatened to sue Sino-Thai Co, the contractor carrying out the demolition, for violating the Historic Sites Act. The department had also planned to sue the Supreme Court, but now has given up on that.

The source said Sino-Thai could lodge a countersuit against the Fine Arts Department for allegedly filing a false statement.

Sitthisak Wanachakij, spokesman for the Court of Justice, said the court received a Fine Arts Department statement yesterday asking that the demolition be halted. Talks between the two parties will likely be held immediately after the New Year's break, he said.

nationlogo.jpg

-- The Nation 2012-12-25

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.