Maramook Posted February 20, 2013 Share Posted February 20, 2013 (edited) Recently someone told that there would a prohibition of visiting Chiang Mai by tourists: tourists must not stay in Chiang Mai (city and province as well) over than 2 weeks. And something similar about Pai. It seemed far-fetched. Was that true? If it was, do you have a link for it? Edited February 20, 2013 by Maramook Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post junglechef Posted February 20, 2013 Popular Post Share Posted February 20, 2013 I believe this is a promotion "to get a rise" in interest for going to Pattaya to get another appendage pulled 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluweyze Posted February 20, 2013 Share Posted February 20, 2013 If you are that gullible I have a number of sure fires investments to talk to you about. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uptheos Posted February 20, 2013 Share Posted February 20, 2013 I believe this is a promotion "to get a rise" in interest for going to Pattaya to get another appendage pulled Judging by a previous comment of his.....you could be right. Yesterday, 08:08 I find that I'm missing Pattaya style discos and hot girls. Recently I saw the only girl dancing in go-go bar. It was not definitely what I expected and looking for. So where are the dissolute places in Chiang Mai? Loi Kroh road and PornPing, what else? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maramook Posted February 20, 2013 Author Share Posted February 20, 2013 I believe this is a promotion "to get a rise" in interest for going to Pattaya to get another appendage pulled Judging by a previous comment of his.....you could be right. Yesterday, 08:08 I find that I'm missing Pattaya style discos and hot girls. Recently I saw the only girl dancing in go-go bar. It was not definitely what I expected and looking for. So where are the dissolute places in Chiang Mai? Loi Kroh road and PornPing, what else? That's hilarious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Choonpon Posted February 20, 2013 Share Posted February 20, 2013 Can't be true..you kidding me right ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dante99 Posted February 20, 2013 Share Posted February 20, 2013 Maramook, You yourself have the link for it, you just have to use it more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellodolly Posted February 20, 2013 Share Posted February 20, 2013 If you are that gullible I have a number of sure fires investments to talk to you about. Don't listen to him he is trying to con you out of your money. I on the other hand have some prime property in San Fransisco with a bridge spanning the bay already built on it. I can let it go cheap as I have made my millions off of it and no longer need the money or the hassle of trying not to pay tax on it. I also have some prime property in Arizona and Florida. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uptheos Posted February 20, 2013 Share Posted February 20, 2013 If you are that gullible I have a number of sure fires investments to talk to you about. Don't listen to him he is trying to con you out of your money. I on the other hand have some prime property in San Fransisco with a bridge spanning the bay already built on it. I can let it go cheap as I have made my millions off of it and no longer need the money or the hassle of trying not to pay tax on it. I also have some prime property in Arizona and Florida. I presume the property in Arizona is a beach front? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave2 Posted February 20, 2013 Share Posted February 20, 2013 re I also have some prime property in Arizona and Florida and england ? dave2 doi suthep pic taken 10 mins ago : ( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellodolly Posted February 20, 2013 Share Posted February 20, 2013 If you are that gullible I have a number of sure fires investments to talk to you about. Don't listen to him he is trying to con you out of your money. I on the other hand have some prime property in San Fransisco with a bridge spanning the bay already built on it. I can let it go cheap as I have made my millions off of it and no longer need the money or the hassle of trying not to pay tax on it. I also have some prime property in Arizona and Florida. I presume the property in Arizona is a beach front? You blew the surprise. Yes indeedy do it is. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tywais Posted February 20, 2013 Share Posted February 20, 2013 Maramook, You yourself have the link for it, you just have to use it more. Probably points to Notthenation. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinnieTheKhwai Posted February 20, 2013 Share Posted February 20, 2013 I betting this is just the regular Farlang Distortion Field. Someone (not necessarily the OP) misunderstood the visa-free land-entry. If you enter Thailand overland (for example from Mae Sai), without any visa, as a citizen from a visa-exempt country (most Western countries), then you get a two week stay. Next. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NancyL Posted February 20, 2013 Share Posted February 20, 2013 I betting this is just the regular Farlang Distortion Field. Someone (not necessarily the OP) misunderstood the visa-free land-entry. If you enter Thailand overland (for example from Mae Sai), without any visa, as a citizen from a visa-exempt country (most Western countries), then you get a two week stay. Next. Bingo! This has got to be the only reasonable explanation for someone having this wild mis-understanding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellodolly Posted February 20, 2013 Share Posted February 20, 2013 I betting this is just the regular Farlang Distortion Field. Someone (not necessarily the OP) misunderstood the visa-free land-entry. If you enter Thailand overland (for example from Mae Sai), without any visa, as a citizen from a visa-exempt country (most Western countries), then you get a two week stay. Next. Bingo! This has got to be the only reasonable explanation for someone having this wild mis-understanding. Does this mean he is not interested in my holdings? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MESmith Posted February 20, 2013 Share Posted February 20, 2013 If you are that gullible I have a number of sure fires investments to talk to you about. Don't listen to him he is trying to con you out of your money. I on the other hand have some prime property in San Fransisco with a bridge spanning the bay already built on it. I can let it go cheap as I have made my millions off of it and no longer need the money or the hassle of trying not to pay tax on it. I also have some prime property in Arizona and Florida. Was it you who bought London Bridge? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricardo Posted February 20, 2013 Share Posted February 20, 2013 If you are that gullible I have a number of sure fires investments to talk to you about. Don't listen to him he is trying to con you out of your money. I on the other hand have some prime property in San Fransisco with a bridge spanning the bay already built on it. I can let it go cheap as I have made my millions off of it and no longer need the money or the hassle of trying not to pay tax on it. I also have some prime property in Arizona and Florida. I presume the property in Arizona is a beach front? I myself can offer prime property, with thermal-springs, in Atlantis ! Great investment opportunity for anyone who failed basic-history at school ! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maramook Posted February 21, 2013 Author Share Posted February 21, 2013 (edited) I betting this is just the regular Farlang Distortion Field. Someone (not necessarily the OP) misunderstood the visa-free land-entry. If you enter Thailand overland (for example from Mae Sai), without any visa, as a citizen from a visa-exempt country (most Western countries), then you get a two week stay. Next. What? I always do this and I've always gotten 30-days stamp (or visa if you will). I never did it from Mae Sai though, but it doesn't matter I believe. Are you sure? Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar - from all of them I got 30-days stamp and there was never any problem. Edited February 21, 2013 by Maramook Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eek Posted February 21, 2013 Share Posted February 21, 2013 Winnie, hes still not getting it. You might wanna draw him a diagram...try to keep words out from it..and include LOTS of pictures. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellodolly Posted February 21, 2013 Share Posted February 21, 2013 If you are that gullible I have a number of sure fires investments to talk to you about.Don't listen to him he is trying to con you out of your money.I on the other hand have some prime property in San Fransisco with a bridge spanning the bay already built on it. I can let it go cheap as I have made my millions off of it and no longer need the money or the hassle of trying not to pay tax on it. I also have some prime property in Arizona and Florida. I presume the property in Arizona is a beach front? I myself can offer prime property, with thermal-springs, in Atlantis ! Great investment opportunity for anyone who failed basic-history at school ! Sounds promising how many acres and elevation in relation to sea level? Can we make these deals with out a work permit? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinnieTheKhwai Posted February 22, 2013 Share Posted February 22, 2013 I betting this is just the regular Farlang Distortion Field. Someone (not necessarily the OP) misunderstood the visa-free land-entry. If you enter Thailand overland (for example from Mae Sai), without any visa, as a citizen from a visa-exempt country (most Western countries), then you get a two week stay. Next. What? I always do this and I've always gotten 30-days stamp (or visa if you will). I never did it from Mae Sai though, but it doesn't matter I believe. Are you sure? Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar - from all of them I got 30-days stamp and there was never any problem. If you fly in then yes, you get 30 days. If you show up on the pavement at a land border from a neighboring country without a visa, then it's 15 days. Not saying this is necessarily a problem, but it is a 15 day stay. Has been like this for a couple of years now, since the end of 2008 or early 2009 I believe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diablo Bob Posted February 22, 2013 Share Posted February 22, 2013 I betting this is just the regular Farlang Distortion Field. Someone (not necessarily the OP) misunderstood the visa-free land-entry. If you enter Thailand overland (for example from Mae Sai), without any visa, as a citizen from a visa-exempt country (most Western countries), then you get a two week stay. Next. What? I always do this and I've always gotten 30-days stamp (or visa if you will). I never did it from Mae Sai though, but it doesn't matter I believe. Are you sure? Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar - from all of them I got 30-days stamp and there was never any problem. If you fly in then yes, you get 30 days. If you show up on the pavement at a land border from a neighboring country without a visa, then it's 15 days. Not saying this is necessarily a problem, but it is a 15 day stay. Has been like this for a couple of years now, since the end of 2008 or early 2009 I believe. OK Winnie, I have a question...... I have some friends coming into Thailand by Yacht from Singapore, do they get 30 days or 15 days? They are planning on 30 days in-country prior to heading on to Hong Kong. If 15 days they will anchor at Koh Chang then slip into Cambodia then back into Thailand for another 15 days. If 30 days they would anchor closer to Chonburi. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maramook Posted February 22, 2013 Author Share Posted February 22, 2013 (edited) I betting this is just the regular Farlang Distortion Field. Someone (not necessarily the OP) misunderstood the visa-free land-entry. If you enter Thailand overland (for example from Mae Sai), without any visa, as a citizen from a visa-exempt country (most Western countries), then you get a two week stay. Next. What? I always do this and I've always gotten 30-days stamp (or visa if you will). I never did it from Mae Sai though, but it doesn't matter I believe. Are you sure? Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar - from all of them I got 30-days stamp and there was never any problem. If you fly in then yes, you get 30 days. If you show up on the pavement at a land border from a neighboring country without a visa, then it's 15 days. Not saying this is necessarily a problem, but it is a 15 day stay. Has been like this for a couple of years now, since the end of 2008 or early 2009 I believe. As I said early, I've always gotten 30-days stamp however I did that. Edited February 22, 2013 by Maramook Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinnieTheKhwai Posted February 22, 2013 Share Posted February 22, 2013 I betting this is just the regular Farlang Distortion Field. Someone (not necessarily the OP) misunderstood the visa-free land-entry. If you enter Thailand overland (for example from Mae Sai), without any visa, as a citizen from a visa-exempt country (most Western countries), then you get a two week stay. Next. What? I always do this and I've always gotten 30-days stamp (or visa if you will). I never did it from Mae Sai though, but it doesn't matter I believe. Are you sure? Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar - from all of them I got 30-days stamp and there was never any problem. If you fly in then yes, you get 30 days. If you show up on the pavement at a land border from a neighboring country without a visa, then it's 15 days. Not saying this is necessarily a problem, but it is a 15 day stay. Has been like this for a couple of years now, since the end of 2008 or early 2009 I believe. OK Winnie, I have a question...... I have some friends coming into Thailand by Yacht from Singapore, do they get 30 days or 15 days? They are planning on 30 days in-country prior to heading on to Hong Kong. If 15 days they will anchor at Koh Chang then slip into Cambodia then back into Thailand for another 15 days. If 30 days they would anchor closer to Chonburi. No clue about that.. Maybe ask on the Pattaya (or Phuket) forum.. Or get a tourist visa and be sure of getting 60 days regardless of how you enter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beetlejuice Posted February 22, 2013 Share Posted February 22, 2013 I believe this is a promotion "to get a rise" in interest for going to Pattaya to get another appendage pulledJudging by a previous comment of his.....you could be right. Yesterday, 08:08 I find that I'm missing Pattaya style discos and hot girls. Recently I saw the only girl dancing in go-go bar. It was not definitely what I expected and looking for. So where are the dissolute places in Chiang Mai? Loi Kroh road and PornPing, what else? Loi Kroh road is about all there is. What else was leveled and planted with trees about 3 years ago and renamed, nowhere else. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NancyL Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 There's a great Visa forum at the top of the list of the various boards for ThaiVisa.com That's the best place to ask your visa questions. I know they've covered entry into Thailand via yacht, but I didn't pay attention to the answer since it's unlikely I'll ever sit foot on a yacht in Chiang Mai. Also, maybe they can convince Maramook that in recent years, the visa exempt period has indeed been 15-days if entering by land and 30 days if entering by air. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now