xen Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 I personally have never understood having the Thai air force. Who are they going to do air strikes on, Cambodia ??? Don't you think Thailand has the rigth to have an Air Force just like you country does ? Anyway, during WWII Thailand fought Laos-based Franchs. Apparantely the Thai AF did good that maybe another reason they want the tradition to continue. Thailand was one of the first countries to have an air force (1913). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john baah jumper Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 (edited) can you believe anything these military people tell you? that these face saving thais tell you? would you place money on saying categorically that this is not an excuse for some military personnel gone mad with a gun and shot these people or some other such bad face causing nonsense? Edited August 28, 2013 by john baah jumper Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnlandy Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 I personally have never understood having the Thai air force. Who are they going to do air strikes on, Cambodia ???? Well at the moment it seems that they are practicing upon themselves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoghurtLX Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 I personally have never understood having the Thai air force. Who are they going to do air strikes on, Cambodia ???? Neutral States like Austria,Switzerland or Sweden have an air-force. To have an air-force doesn't mean you HAVE to strike on something. There are enough other scenarios where you may need an air-force, including securing the sovereignty over the airspace. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fakename Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 If your country does not have its own air force, then you will have the air force of another country! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RigPig Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 I personally have never understood having the Thai air force. Who are they going to do air strikes on, Cambodia ??? Don't you think Thailand has the rigth to have an Air Force just like you country does ? Anyway, during WWII Thailand fought Laos-based Franchs. Apparantely the Thai AF did good that maybe another reason they want the tradition to continue. Thailand was one of the first countries to have an air force (1913). Well you would think that in 100 years even they could have worked out how to unload a gun safely and not have a plane explode..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peterbkk9 Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 I personally have never understood having the Thai air force. Who are they going to do air strikes on, Cambodia ???? I don't see the reason why Thailand should not have an air force. Other ASEAN countries do Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
livingthedreamonthebeach Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 I personally have never understood having the Thai air force. Who are they going to do air strikes on, Cambodia ???? Ditto for having an aircraft carrier and I believe there was / is talk of getting submarines. It's all just face and to stick it to all the near neighbours, we are bigger, better and stronger than you. As if they care. What a stupid statement!!! MR super does your country of origin have an air force?? if so why do they need an air force?? Why do you think?? The Thai air force pilots are very good pilots and before making these statements you should think about how good your countries air force is and why they need an air force before posting such a stupid statement. the second statement by Mr Platinum member mmmmm just as stupid. Thailand is one of the most progressive countries in the region so why shouldn't they get better military equipment?/ Is that only the right of powerful Western nations ?? no of course not 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EyesWideOpen Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 (edited) I personally have never understood having the Thai air force. Who are they going to do air strikes on, Cambodia ???? Neutral States like Austria,Switzerland or Sweden have an air-force. To have an air-force doesn't mean you HAVE to strike on something. There are enough other scenarios where you may need an air-force, including securing the sovereignty over the airspace. Treaty of Amity 1966 Thailand has something better than their current air force. They have a treaty with America that says basically America will open a can of whoop ass on any country that attacks Thailand. So all these goofy expenditures on military hardware is simply a way to enrich the 1700 military generals here in Thailand. 1. the blimp that cannot fly 2. mind boggling attempt to get a submarine. 3. the fabulous aircraft carrier that has no planes that can fly, and I read recently it is incapable of making headway Edited August 28, 2013 by Rimmer 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john baah jumper Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 (edited) one wonders why laos has an army? they're going to whoop china? thai? burma? vietnam? Edited August 28, 2013 by john baah jumper Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hansnl Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 I personally have never understood having the Thai air force. Who are they going to do air strikes on, Cambodia ??? Don't you think Thailand has the rigth to have an Air Force just like you country does ? Anyway, during WWII Thailand fought Laos-based Franchs. Apparantely the Thai AF did good that maybe another reason they want the tradition to continue. they also surrended to the Japs. Ask anyone between 15 and 45 about WW2 No such thing happened Wonderful schools here, lets not teach the kids anything about the outside world Thailand is proud to declare that it has never been colonised nor ocupied. Period! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluetongue Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 Well according to Janes when I last read it 2 years ago Cambodia has an Air Force of some 500 personnel but no planes. Both planes I believe were twin props and they were on permanent loan to the Prime Minister's security detail. Laos doesn't have any either. Myanmar and Malaysia both do. So Thailand is probably wise to have some too. They probably have training aircraft which would only be used for combat in wartime and would typically be older slower and less expensive in case the trainees prang them. I doubt whether the Gripen's use guns but I could be wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
livingthedreamonthebeach Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 All you people putting down Thai military and its ability. Do you know anything about firstly aviation ?? very easy to post these comments while you live here in Thailand and put everything about the country down. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ginjag Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 I personally have never understood having the Thai air force. Who are they going to do air strikes on, Cambodia ??? Don't you think Thailand has the rigth to have an Air Force just like you country does ? Anyway, during WWII Thailand fought Laos-based Franchs. Apparantely the Thai AF did good that maybe another reason they want the tradition to continue. they also surrended to the Japs. Ask anyone between 15 and 45 about WW2 No such thing happened Wonderful schools here, lets not teach the kids anything about the outside world Thailand is proud to declare that it has never been colonised nor ocupied. Period! According to TAT it is colonised with High End Tourists. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drdoom6996 Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 I personally have never understood having the Thai air force. Who are they going to do air strikes on, Cambodia ??? Don't you think Thailand has the rigth to have an Air Force just like you country does ? Anyway, during WWII Thailand fought Laos-based Franchs. Apparantely the Thai AF did good that maybe another reason they want the tradition to continue. they also surrended to the Japs. Ask anyone between 15 and 45 about WW2 No such thing happened Wonderful schools here, lets not teach the kids anything about the outside world Look at a map of pre WWII and post WWII. Thailand gained a lot of land thanks to the Japs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billd766 Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 (edited) All you people putting down Thai military and its ability. Do you know anything about firstly aviation ?? very easy to post these comments while you live here in Thailand and put everything about the country down. Well I did 25 years in the RAF. Does that count? How many years of military service did you complete and in which branch? Edited August 28, 2013 by billd766 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trainman34014 Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 God forbid Thailand ever gets an Atomic Weapon ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billd766 Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 (edited) Well according to Janes when I last read it 2 years ago Cambodia has an Air Force of some 500 personnel but no planes. Both planes I believe were twin props and they were on permanent loan to the Prime Minister's security detail. Laos doesn't have any either. Myanmar and Malaysia both do. So Thailand is probably wise to have some too. They probably have training aircraft which would only be used for combat in wartime and would typically be older slower and less expensive in case the trainees prang them. I doubt whether the Gripen's use guns but I could be wrong. It actually does have a single 27mm cannon. From Wikipedia at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saab_JAS_39_Gripen Armaments and equipment The Gripen is typically capable of carrying up to 14,330 lb (6.50 t) of armament or equipment.[73] Munitions include various missiles, laser-guided bombs, and a single 27 mm Mauser BK-27 cannon;[78] missiles include the AIM-9 Sidewinder air-to-air missile, the AGM-65 Maverick air-to-ground missile, and the RBS-15 anti-ship missile.[79] External reconnaissance and targeting modules, such as the LITENING targeting pod, have been employed upon the Gripen by some operators.[80] The Gripen's Ternav tactical navigation system combines information from multiple onboard systems such as the air data computer, radar altimeter, and GPS to continuously calculate the Gripen's location.[81] Edited August 28, 2013 by billd766 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Considered Opinion Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 Apparently they need more training. And more stomachs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ginjag Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 Well according to Janes when I last read it 2 years ago Cambodia has an Air Force of some 500 personnel but no planes. Both planes I believe were twin props and they were on permanent loan to the Prime Minister's security detail. Laos doesn't have any either. Myanmar and Malaysia both do. So Thailand is probably wise to have some too. They probably have training aircraft which would only be used for combat in wartime and would typically be older slower and less expensive in case the trainees prang them. I doubt whether the Gripen's use guns but I could be wrong. These Grippens are good well equipped aircraft fully operational for anything -training-combat. The only thing that bothers me is why they did this deal, when they have a treaty with the States, already use F16 etc -better the devil you know. My guess obtaining these aircraft some special deal must be involved. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gonzo the Face Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 (edited) I personally have never understood having the Thai air force. Who are they going to do air strikes on, Cambodia ???? Ditto for having an aircraft carrier and I believe there was / is talk of getting submarines. It's all just face and to stick it to all the near neighbours, we are bigger, better and stronger than you. As if they care. What a stupid statement!!! MR super does your country of origin have an air force?? if so why do they need an air force?? Why do you think?? The Thai air force pilots are very good pilots and before making these statements you should think about how good your countries air force is and why they need an air force before posting such a stupid statement. the second statement by Mr Platinum member mmmmm just as stupid. Thailand is one of the most progressive countries in the region so why shouldn't they get better military equipment?/ Is that only the right of powerful Western nations ?? no of course not I know you may have difficulty understanding this Mr. Livinglifebydreamingonthebeach, but how about a hint........... would you let your toddler play with fireworks after he had learned how to strike a match or work a lighter????? Never mind ..... better not answer that. but maybe like not being in front of the working end of a gun when trying to unjam it...... Maybe huh, maybe Edited August 28, 2013 by Gonzo the Face 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post barrybankruad Posted August 28, 2013 Popular Post Share Posted August 28, 2013 Cambodia at one stage did have aircraft. 15 years plus ago when the Cambodian Army were fighting the Khmer Rouge, where I live you could regularly hear the guns going off. One day two aircraft flew very low and quite slowly over my village. You could distinctly see the Ankhor Wat type symbols in the roundels. I,m not aircraft expert but I think one was an Italian macchi, it had push-pull double propellers on the front, the other was a very old Soviet type MIG with the air intake at the front and the pilot sitting on top of the engine in his cockpit. They flew slowly in formation over my village and well inland in Thai territory, did a lazy turn over Ban Kruad and headed back towards Cambodia. Someone in authority obviously wasn't happy with this because about 15 minutes later a Thai Air Force F16 flew very low and very,very, fast over the village towards Cambodia. Never saw a Cambodian plane after that. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
livingthedreamonthebeach Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 All you people putting down Thai military and its ability. Do you know anything about firstly aviation ?? very easy to post these comments while you live here in Thailand and put everything about the country down. Well I did 25 years in the RAF. Does that count? How many years of military service did you complete and in which branch? Where you a pilot??? I am an active pilot with over 28 years flying. I fly with x Thai Military pilots daily and they are as good as any British/American/Australian pilots I have flown with. I suppose you might live in Thailand now right?? If so with your Military service would be nice to have some mutual respect for the air force of the country you now live in!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canman Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 I personally have never understood having the Thai air force. Who are they going to do air strikes on, Cambodia ???? Ditto for having an aircraft carrier and I believe there was / is talk of getting submarines. It's all just face and to stick it to all the near neighbours, we are bigger, better and stronger than you. As if they care. What a stupid statement!!! MR super does your country of origin have an air force?? if so why do they need an air force?? Why do you think?? The Thai air force pilots are very good pilots and before making these statements you should think about how good your countries air force is and why they need an air force before posting such a stupid statement. the second statement by Mr Platinum member mmmmm just as stupid. Thailand is one of the most progressive countries in the region so why shouldn't they get better military equipment?/ Is that only the right of powerful Western nations ?? no of course not "Thailand is one of the most progressive countries in the region" Seriously? I usually refrain from Thai bashing but could you let us know on what you base that statement on? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gonzo the Face Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 All you people putting down Thai military and its ability. Do you know anything about firstly aviation ?? very easy to post these comments while you live here in Thailand and put everything about the country down. Well I did 25 years in the RAF. Does that count? How many years of military service did you complete and in which branch? Where you a pilot??? I am an active pilot with over 28 years flying. I fly with x Thai Military pilots daily and they are as good as any British/American/Australian pilots I have flown with. I suppose you might live in Thailand now right?? If so with your Military service would be nice to have some mutule respect for the air force of the country you now live in!! Respect is earned not demanded....... If you are a current pilot ......may the deities in heaven protect us 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pimay1 Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 All you people putting down Thai military and its ability. Do you know anything about firstly aviation ?? very easy to post these comments while you live here in Thailand and put everything about the country down. Well I did 25 years in the RAF. Does that count? How many years of military service did you complete and in which branch? Where you a pilot??? I am an active pilot with over 28 years flying. I fly with x Thai Military pilots daily and they are as good as any British/American/Australian pilots I have flown with. I suppose you might live in Thailand now right?? If so with your Military service would be nice to have some mutule respect for the air force of the country you now live in!! You must have an exciting job Sir flying with x Thai Military pilots daily. Where do you fly to? This is not a baiting post I would just like to know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LuckyLew Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 it is ok ... they can put the blimp in service in it's place Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigbamboo Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 I think the Thai military should be respected if only for it's officer class which is as amazing as anything in Thailand. China has the biggest regular army in the world at over 2 million and yet can muster less than 200 generals. Thailand's army at under 200,000 is less than a tenth of the size and yet has more than 1600 generals at the last count. So if I was a betting man I'd fancy a Chinese win every time.... unless they were playing snooker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HerbalEd Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 I personally have never understood having the Thai air force. Who are they going to do air strikes on, Cambodia ???? Maybe. The time to "start" an air force is not when you need it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rosswlkr Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 I personally have never understood having the Thai air force. Who are they going to do air strikes on, Cambodia ???? Ditto for having an aircraft carrier and I believe there was / is talk of getting submarines. It's all just face and to stick it to all the near neighbours, we are bigger, better and stronger than you. As if they care. how about using it to patrol and crack down on illegal fishing in the Gulf of Thailand that would be a good start, whilst there still remains at least a slim chance of preventing every last piece of sea life being dredged out of there, which is the path they are currently on! How will Thailand look as a holiday destination when the Gulf is a lifeless pond and the beaches covered in oil slicks? And lest we forget any country with huge landmass, shorelines and maritime space needs to have defenses - Thailand being no exception. Still, should be more careful next time, a hammer is not a good way to unjam a gun! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now