Jump to content

Thai govt rejects election delay despite deadly violence


webfact

Recommended Posts

Thai govt rejects election delay despite deadly violence
by Anusak KONGLANG

BANGKOK, December 26, 2013 (AFP) - Thailand's government Thursday rejected calls to postpone February elections after clashes between police and opposition protesters in the capital left one policeman dead and dozens wounded on both sides.

The new outbreak of civil strife deepened the crisis facing Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra, whose government has been shaken by weeks of mass street rallies seeking to curb her family's political dominance.

The long-running conflict broadly pits a Bangkok-based middle class and elite against rural and working-class voters loyal to Yingluck's older brother Thaksin Shinawatra, who was ousted as premier by a military coup in 2006.

Police fired tear gas and rubber bullets Thursday at rock-throwing demonstrators who tried to force their way into a sports stadium in the capital where election candidates were gathered to register for the February 2 polls.

The protesters -- who want to overthrow Yingluck's government and install an unelected "people's council" in its place -- accuse billionaire tycoon-turned-politician Thaksin of corruption and say he controls his sister's government from his base in Dubai.

They have vowed to block the February election, saying it will only return Thaksin's allies to power.

Nearly 100 people from both sides were injured, according to the emergency services.

Twenty-five police officers were hospitalised, with 10 in serious condition, according to a police spokesman. One police officer died of a gunshot wound.

"Today democracy in Thailand is hijacked by violence & thuggery. Shame!" Sunai Phasuk, a senior researcher with New York-based Human Rights Watch, wrote on Twitter.

As the violence escalated the Election Commission recommended the February polls be delayed indefinitely.

"We cannot organise free and fair elections under the constitution in the current circumstances," said commission member Prawit Rattanapien, who along with other vote officials had to be evacuated from the stadium by helicopter.

But the government rejected the proposal, saying it would not solve the bitter standoff.

"The government believes delaying an election will cause more violence," Deputy Prime Minister Phongthep Thepkanjana said in a televised address to the nation.

He noted that under the constitution, an election should normally be held no more than 60 days after the dissolution of parliament, which happened in early December.

The main opposition Democrat Party -- which has not won an elected majority in about two decades -- has vowed to boycott the vote.

Thailand has seen several bouts of political turmoil since Thaksin's overthrow.

His supporters have accused the protesters of trying to incite the military to seize power again, in a country which has seen 18 successful or attempted coups since 1932.

Those wounded Thursday included one protester who was reported in serious condition with an apparent gunshot wound to his head.

Two journalists, one Thai and one Japanese, were among the injured, according to the public health ministry.
Security forces denied firing live rounds, saying only rubber bullets and tear gas were used against demonstrators.
"Protesters are not peaceful and unarmed as they claimed," another deputy prime minister, Surapong Tovichakchaikul, said in a televised address.

"They are intimidating officials and trespassing in government buildings."

The weeks-long unrest, which has drawn tens of thousands of protesters onto the streets, has left six people dead and nearly 400 wounded.

It is the worst civil strife since 2010, when more than 90 civilians were killed in a bloody military crackdown on pro-Thaksin protests under the previous government.

Thaksin is adored among rural communities and the working class, particularly in the north and northeast. But he is reviled by the elite, the Bangkok middle class and many southerners, who see him as corrupt and a threat to the revered monarchy.

Pro-Thaksin parties have won every election since 2001, most recently with a landslide victory under Yingluck two years ago.

The protesters want loosely-defined reforms -- such as an end to alleged "vote buying" -- before new elections are held in around a year to 18 months.

The rallies were triggered by a controversial amnesty bill, since abandoned by the ruling party, which Thaksin's opponents feared would have allowed his return without going to jail for a corruption conviction which he says is politically motivated.

The National Anti-Corruption Commission said Thursday that it would press abuse of power charges against the speakers of the two houses of parliament in relation to another controversial proposed law, to amend the make-up of the Senate.

The anti-graft body said it was still considering whether to press the same charge against 381 other politicians, including Yingluck, who supported the bill.

afplogo.jpg
-- (c) Copyright AFP 2013-12-26

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The government clings on to power? You can form your own view. Most intelligent people can see what is going on.

A government put in charge by the people!!

As a intelligent person, I can see exactly, what is going on.

The elite, who is never going to win another election, is using all means to keep their place at the trough.

Even if it means a few of their pawns will have to be sacrified (killed).

That is, what is going on!!coffee1.gif

Nocoffee1.gif

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The government clings on to power? You can form your own view. Most intelligent people can see what is going on.

A government put in charge by the people!!

As a intelligent person, I can see exactly, what is going on.

The elite, who is never going to win another election, is using all means to keep their place at the trough.

Even if it means a few of their pawns will have to be sacrified (killed).

That is, what is going on!!coffee1.gif

Nocoffee1.gif

None of them ... That iseother side.. Cares about this country. They all want the power and money.

There is no Democratic side. They are both wrong

Sent from my RM-892_apac_laos_thailand_219 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who are this AFP crowd ?

Every second or third sentence of everything that comes from them has the same copy and paste rubbish about the BKK elite, why cant they get over that and realize this is not about the BKK rich fighting the northern poor.?

This is about the ordinary people of this country who have had a guts full of a crooked government led by a convicted criminal on the run, people who want to see change brought about for the good of the country, themselves and their children.

Yingluck has the power to stop all the violence right now by resigning, postponing the election and supporting reform by a non political group, but she wont do it.

I cant believe she is so masochistic that she really wants to be in the middle of this, there can only be one reason she is still in there and that must be at the insistence of big brother.

I see the EC commissioners are threatening to resign if the election is not postponed.

What happens if they do ?

With no body to run an election how can it go ahead?

OK reds lets have some more abuse, or possibly you could try to write something sensible.

Because they have never visited the protests. Or simple because they don't care. Yellow vs Red, Rich vs Poor. Democracy killing elites.

That Sells!!!!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Yingluck government has now made an absolutely horrible decision. It is hard to imagine that the line of this government is that an election delay would mean more violence ! What rational reasoning could be possibly behind that premise ? So it is quite clear that Thaksin wants this election to take place. Clearly, his interests are maximized if - yet again - Pheu Thai takes over the " reform " process as they have repeatedly envisioned it in the past. Yingluck is the prime minister, yet seems oblivious and even dangerously removed from what is happening in the capital. All her " statements " completely skirt the harsh reality on the ground, and her minders are left to collect the pieces.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The government clings on to power? You can form your own view. Most intelligent people can see what is going on.

Same same, Mark clinking to power when order the use of live bullet to disperses the protesters that caused 90+ death. You can form your own view. Most intelligent people can see what is going on.

twisting History doesn't make your comment true! It is well known that Abhisit offered elections in 2010. It was the red Shirts who refused this offer. They had every intention of staying to burn Bangkok unless parliament was dissolved.

The reds would have left in a flash if Abihist said in 2010 we stay in government but Thaksin gets amnesty and his money back.

Yingluck can say what she likes but the next Thaksin government will be the same as the last 3 all about a Thaksin amnesty and his return to rule.

Edited by waza
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The government clings on to power? You can form your own view. Most intelligent people can see what is going on.

Same same, Mark clinking to power when order the use of live bullet to disperses the protesters that caused 90+ death. You can form your own view. Most intelligent people can see what is going on.

twisting History doesn't make your comment true! It is well known that Abhisit offered elections in 2010. It was the red Shirts who refused this offer. They had every intention of staying to burn Bangkok unless parliament was dissolved.

The reds would have left in a flash if Abihist said in 2010 we stay in government but Thaksin gets amnesty and his money back.

Yingluck can say what she likes but the next Thaksin government will be the same as the last 3 all about a Thaksin amnesty and his return to rule.

Please don't twist history.

Then: Abhisit offered to dissolved the house on condition that . . . . .

Now: Yingluck ALREADY dissolved the house.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Bangkok-based middle class and elite against rural and working-class"
So tired of seeing this lazy cliched copy/paste "journalism". It's certainly not just affluent Bangkok people protesting against the PTP and Shinawatra clan. It's people from many provinces and many walks of life. And please, if anyone is elitist it's the Shinawatra family. By far the richest mob of all, and clearly determined to grab Thailand by the balls through their wealth and influence. Trying to portray the political situation as rich vs. poor is just plain stupid and wrong, and did I mention lazy journalism? The foreign press are especially getting the whole story wrong.

Bangkok elites 55.4 billion USD net wealth, VS Thaksin net Wealth 2.7 billion USD, that is just the top 10 wealthiest Thais, then you start adding up the rest of the elites and there money makes Thaksin look poor compared to them!

Edited by bkkfaranguy
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you ever watched Alpine Ibex goats headbutting each other for hours, that is nothing compared to these stubborn greedy politicians over here. At least the goats stop bashing their heads against eachother eventually. No chance of that happening here is there. Sad when we could have goats in charge and they'd probably get more work done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good for the government, this reactionary gang of thugs and murderers must not be allowed to disrupt the democratic process.

What democratic process? Do you seriously believe any elections in Thailand were democratic? Stop kidding yourself. What is happening these days in Bangkok is exact result of setting red thugs free instead of locking them up for good. As long as you have thugs like Jatuporn and Nattawut occupying public functions instead of being in jail there is no hope for Thailand. Red thugs from 2010 got rewarded for their crimes and terrorism. They set an example that being a thug pays off.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...