fab4 Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 The photo on post 12 looks a tad staged to me. The fact his name appears on the bottom makes it look even odder. I think most people would be dousing fires in their garden rather than taking snaps of them, methinks. More than a tad methinks..... Just out of interest but if you look at the fire in the bin at the bottom of the photo, just to the left looks to me like a hand. If it is, it obviously belongs to a person who would I think be more interested in rescuing the garden water hose reel which is next to the burning rubbish bin, but obviously not. IIRC at the last home fire-bombing they put the fire out before documenting. This led to some PTP sycophant claiming that it was staged to garner sympathy. Whenever another violent attack occurs against Thaksin/PTP critics, the same names appear to disparage it. Anything rather than admit that there is a recurrent theme of attacks against them, their families and homes. Really? And the same names blame it on Thaksin/PTP/UDD because....................? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
englishoak Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 Disgusting ! Thaksin obviously did with a drone operated from his desk in Dubai.......... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JRSoul Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 IIRC at the last home fire-bombing they put the fire out before documenting. This led to some PTP sycophant claiming that it was staged to garner sympathy. Whenever another violent attack occurs against Thaksin/PTP critics, the same names appear to disparage it. Anything rather than admit that there is a recurrent theme of attacks against them, their families and homes. Really? And the same names blame it on Thaksin/PTP/UDD because....................? Because they have memories and recall the precedents; red shirts caught on film; red shirts confessing; red shirt leaders inciting arson, violence and hatred; and a plethora of attacks on ANYONE brave enough to criticise the little tin god. Who benefits from intimidation and violence against his critics? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
suthep songserm Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 It was a left undetonated firework during countdown...??? Sent from my IQ9.1 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluespunk Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 The photo on post 12 looks a tad staged to me. The fact his name appears on the bottom makes it look even odder. I think most people would be dousing fires in their garden rather than taking snaps of them, methinks. He hosts a political show. He's a journalist. He can see what will make good press in an instant. Plus in this age it seems that we live through the "social media", photograph first, think later. Nothing is real unless its on Facebook. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
h90 Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 Tatsujin, on 07 Jan 2014 - 10:46, said:Not identified a motive for the attack? Seriously? What a farce . . . "Theema “Judd” Kanjanapairin, the host of a political debate show on the anti-government Bluesky Channel" Most intelligent people might think that was a possible motive. All intelligent people...... So , we are not talking about Red Shirts then...... Well there is a difference between what people think and what they speak about. Surely most, if not all know the reason, just they pretend to be stupid. And they are very good at it..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Scamper Posted January 7, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted January 7, 2014 As the administration takes a backseat as vigilantes wreck havoc on those they do not hold dear, " democracy " in practice is redefined again and again, as in an endless loop. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fab4 Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 (edited) IIRC at the last home fire-bombing they put the fire out before documenting. This led to some PTP sycophant claiming that it was staged to garner sympathy. Whenever another violent attack occurs against Thaksin/PTP critics, the same names appear to disparage it. Anything rather than admit that there is a recurrent theme of attacks against them, their families and homes. Really? And the same names blame it on Thaksin/PTP/UDD because....................? Because they have memories and recall the precedents; red shirts caught on film; red shirts confessing; red shirt leaders inciting arson, violence and hatred; and a plethora of attacks on ANYONE brave enough to criticise the little tin god. Who benefits from intimidation and violence against his critics? Really, and that has what to do with persons unknown allegedly throwing "fire bombs" at a Blue Sky presenters garden? Edited January 7, 2014 by fab4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rubl Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 (edited) Now let me just state here that of course the firebombing of a BlueSky Channel host is totally unrelated to red-shirts. Why would they do such a thing, those peaceful chaps? Furthermore there is no proof the red-shirts are involved. Also there was no mention of firebombs or even grenades in the recent UDD leader gathering. I suggest all wait a bit with further comment, surely it will prove to be a student prank, or an upset mistress, or such. PS I also believe pigs can fly and whistle Edited January 7, 2014 by rubl 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alwyn Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 Tatsujin, on 07 Jan 2014 - 10:46, said:Not identified a motive for the attack? Seriously? What a farce . . . "Theema “Judd” Kanjanapairin, the host of a political debate show on the anti-government Bluesky Channel" Most intelligent people might think that was a possible motive. All intelligent people...... And some even more intelligent people would notice it looks like a bonfire - these same people might think it was caused by Suthep's followers or indeed the house owner in an attempt to discredit PT and start the finger pointing at the red shirts - you know, a bit like the dimwits here are doing. I feel sure (with all of their experience previously) that if it was red shirts they probably would have made more of it? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alwyn Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 The photo on post 12 looks a tad staged to me. The fact his name appears on the bottom makes it look even odder. I think most people would be dousing fires in their garden rather than taking snaps of them, methinks. He hosts a political show. He's a journalist. He can see what will make good press in an instant. Plus in this age it seems that we live through the "social media", photograph first, think later. Nothing is real unless its on Facebook. Yeah you're right... Light a bonfire, take some photos and blame the red shirts for petrol bombing the place. That's what you mean, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skywalker69 Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 Tatsujin, on 07 Jan 2014 - 10:46, said: Not identified a motive for the attack? Seriously? What a farce . . . "Theema “Judd” Kanjanapairin, the host of a political debate show on the anti-government Bluesky Channel" Most intelligent people might think that was a possible motive. All intelligent people...... So , we are not talking about Red Shirts then...... Definitely not talking about some TV members who don´t realize their hero would throw them out of Thailand in the blink of an eye if he could. You must mean the man 'afar' that once started Thai Rak Thai. Sent from my GT-I9300 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spirit47 Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 I would carry water, not making pictures, but I not working in the media business... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Bluespunk Posted January 7, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted January 7, 2014 The photo on post 12 looks a tad staged to me. The fact his name appears on the bottom makes it look even odder. I think most people would be dousing fires in their garden rather than taking snaps of them, methinks. He hosts a political show. He's a journalist. He can see what will make good press in an instant. Plus in this age it seems that we live through the "social media", photograph first, think later. Nothing is real unless its on Facebook. Yeah you're right... Light a bonfire, take some photos and blame the red shirts for petrol bombing the place. That's what you mean, right? Nope. I mean he is the type of person who after a fire bombing would take photos of it rather than put it out. But I think you knew that didn't you. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alwyn Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 The photo on post 12 looks a tad staged to me. The fact his name appears on the bottom makes it look even odder. I think most people would be dousing fires in their garden rather than taking snaps of them, methinks. He hosts a political show. He's a journalist. He can see what will make good press in an instant. Plus in this age it seems that we live through the "social media", photograph first, think later. Nothing is real unless its on Facebook. Yeah you're right... Light a bonfire, take some photos and blame the red shirts for petrol bombing the place. That's what you mean, right? Nope. I mean he is the type of person who after a fire bombing would take photos of it rather than put it out. But I think you knew that didn't you. I've seen the results of petrol bombs. Let's just say they didn't look like that 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prbkk Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 Looks like a BBQ to me 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fleeing Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 Looks like a BBQ to me Really? I can just about make out the shape of an elephant in the one on the left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metisdead Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 A post containing a link to another forum has been removed: 10) Not to post commercial spam or to post any promotional links, URLs or addresses to a member's own business or that would lead people to your site. Not to post URL links to other forums . Not to flood, post commercial or for-profit advertisements, chain letters, pyramid schemes, and similar solicitations. Any member who violates this prohibition will be banned from all forums on this website.Advertisers are the only members allowed to post links, URL's or addresses to their sites. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
backtonormal Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 And so the redshirt terror campaign begins. Firebombs today, M203 grenades coming soon. Like all the other attacks against anti government sponsors...no damage done and nobody hurt..kinda coincidental. Some may believe they are doing it themselves. If harm was intended why not back up the petrol tanker, light the blue touch paper and retreat to a safe distance. More yellow propaganda swallowed by some on here 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
backtonormal Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 Looks like a BBQ to me Just choked on me spittle. Funniest comment of the year so far. Dont upset the uninformed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mackie Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 And so the redshirt terror campaign begins. Firebombs today, M203 grenades coming soon. Like all the other attacks against anti government sponsors...no damage done and nobody hurt..kinda coincidental. Some may believe they are doing it themselves. If harm was intended why not back up the petrol tanker, light the blue touch paper and retreat to a safe distance. More yellow propaganda swallowed by some on here That's what you say. It counts for nothing as long as you are incapable of providing some sort of evidence to support your conspiracy theories. All your assertions are simply conspiracy theories at this point. No evidence whatsoever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
backtonormal Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 Running low on lets get sympathy pranks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tingtongteesood Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 Tatsujin, on 07 Jan 2014 - 10:46, said:Not identified a motive for the attack? Seriously? What a farce . . . "Theema “Judd” Kanjanapairin, the host of a political debate show on the anti-government Bluesky Channel" Most intelligent people might think that was a possible motive. All intelligent people...... And some even more intelligent people would notice it looks like a bonfire - these same people might think it was caused by Suthep's followers or indeed the house owner in an attempt to discredit PT and start the finger pointing at the red shirts - you know, a bit like the dimwits here are doing. I feel sure (with all of their experience previously) that if it was red shirts they probably would have made more of it? You are the 'dimwit' if you really believe your own crap, same as Jatuporn and Nuttawat, they lie so often they start to believe their own bs.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
backtonormal Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 And so the redshirt terror campaign begins. Firebombs today, M203 grenades coming soon. Like all the other attacks against anti government sponsors...no damage done and nobody hurt..kinda coincidental. Some may believe they are doing it themselves. If harm was intended why not back up the petrol tanker, light the blue touch paper and retreat to a safe distance. More yellow propaganda swallowed by some on here That's what you say. It counts for nothing as long as you are incapable of providing some sort of evidence to support your conspiracy theories. All your assertions are simply conspiracy theories at this point. No evidence whatsoever. So what eveidence have we got that this presenter is telling the truth..... According to the yellows the reds have RPG, M!6 and maybe an SS20 warhead nicked from the decommissioned Ukraine nuclear arsenal. So they throw a little accelerant over the fence when they could have blown his house to Rayong. Ask yourself whose explanation is more feasible. They either have heavy weapons or they dont. And they say I am thick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philw Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 Not much of a fire bomb, not much damage.......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mentors Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 Blue Sky TV. Why it remembers me back to Newspaper DER STUERMER? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tingtongteesood Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 First off, if they were going to 'fake it' as the red twits are implying, surely they would have picked the house of someone more important to the protests ? Secondly, if it was red shirt houses being bombed, what do you think you would be saying ? ''Oh they are faking it to try and get some sympathy for the government''. What do you think ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mackie Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 (edited) And so the redshirt terror campaign begins. Firebombs today, M203 grenades coming soon. Like all the other attacks against anti government sponsors...no damage done and nobody hurt..kinda coincidental. Some may believe they are doing it themselves. If harm was intended why not back up the petrol tanker, light the blue touch paper and retreat to a safe distance. More yellow propaganda swallowed by some on here That's what you say. It counts for nothing as long as you are incapable of providing some sort of evidence to support your conspiracy theories. All your assertions are simply conspiracy theories at this point. No evidence whatsoever. So what eveidence have we got that this presenter is telling the truth..... According to the yellows the reds have RPG, M!6 and maybe an SS20 warhead nicked from the decommissioned Ukraine nuclear arsenal. So they throw a little accelerant over the fence when they could have blown his house to Rayong. Ask yourself whose explanation is more feasible. They either have heavy weapons or they dont. And they say I am thick The matter is going to be investigated. The fact remains that his house was firebombed. As for the red shirts being armed, they are armed. I'm not going to post a link umpteenth time for you and others to ignore it once again. Google is your friend. One of red shirt leaders, who ran away to Cambodia, gave an interview in which he openly admitted that arms and weapons were smuggled from Cambodia to North/Northeast of Thailand with the full knowledge and assistance of both Thaksin and the biggest democrat of all, Hun Sen. Not only that Thaksin and his cronies should be tried for corruption once again they should also be tried for high treason. In conclusion, it's not what the yellows say, it's what reds, or to be more precise, red terrorists admitted themselves. Edited January 7, 2014 by Mackie 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philw Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 First off, if they were going to 'fake it' as the red twits are implying, surely they would have picked the house of someone more important to the protests ? Secondly, if it was red shirt houses being bombed, what do you think you would be saying ? ''Oh they are faking it to try and get some sympathy for the government''. What do you think ? Must be some of the 15.7 million twits.............. Have you thought about having a nice relaxing holiday, among Thai people ?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mudcrab Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 Disgusting ! Thaksin obviously did with a drone operated from his desk in Dubai.......... Yep a drone called Yingluck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
(1).thumb.png.bbcb267af4aaf1122a444794828169f7.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now