Jump to content

Dozens injured in grenade attack in central Bangkok


webfact

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 211
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I got up this morning and seen Khun Suthep, crying on stage, while he was making an announcement and my wife said, there are three people dead and many injured. Many of the prostesters, listening, were crying, before he was. You could see tears running down their eyes.

Not sure, if he was talking about the total deaths, since the beginning, or if three people died, in the past 24 hours?

Our Condolences to all the families!

wai2.gifwai.gif

Edited by kurtgruen
Link to comment
Share on other sites

RT @ChadapornLin: Suthep vowed on stage yesterday he will continue his march around Bkk at 10am today despite bombing yesterday

I don't like him and I don't like what he is doing, but he does have balls. Someone threw a bomb at him yesterday.

I don't like him. He does have balls, No one threw a bomb at him. Tragically, in this futile farce, another death...

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just watched two videos of the grenade attack on PBS. What was strange on the first video was the speed with which one of the passengers in the truck ran in the direction from where the grenade was allegedly thrown. I would think that most people would react by assisting the people lying injured on the ground. Strange behavior to me.

While all this is being sorted out, my sincere condolences to the family of the man who succumbed to his injuries and to the families of all the wounded. I wish them a speedy recovery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Phuket taxi driver killed in Bangkok bombing

Phuket Gazette


phuketnews_2014118103719992_sTPygxbVghUs

Prakong Chuchan died from complications after shrapnel damaged a main artery and lacerated a lung. Photo: Prakong Chuchan / Facebook


PHUKET: -- A Phuket protester was the first to die during the “Bangkok Shutdown” after an unidentified person lobbed a bomb at a procession of demonstrators yesterday.


Prakong Chuchan, 46 years old and a member of the Royal Paradise taxi rank, died at 1:57am from complications brought on by severe injuries sustained during the bomb attack. Bomb shrapnel pierced Mr Prakong’s chest, damaging a main artery and lacerating his lung.


Mr Prakong travelled from Phuket to Bangkok on January 12 to join the protests. His last status on Facebook reads, “Even if we do not win, we will not back down.”


About 12 of the other injured protesters were also sent to Ramathibodi Hospital to undergo treatment for injuries sustained during the attack. Six of them have been discharged.




pglogo.jpg
-- Phuket Gazette 2014-01-18

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CAPO said legal action would be taken against not only protest leaders but also ordinary protesters.

So CAPO;s response to the bombing is to threaten the protesters.

Look back on how Thaksin proxy parties deal with opposition, criticism and any form of challenge.

Nice meaningless words of "lets talk, set up a committee, or forum", threats of legal actions for trumped up charges, and selective violence. A three pronged attack. Seem familiar?

CAPO once again warn protesters that exercising their right of free speech and peaceful protest will be treated as insurrection if it is against the caretaker government. A not very veiled threat - we ain't going and we'll get even!

Remove free speech, rule by fear and intimidation, and pretend to be a supporter of democracy and party of the people. Soviet Union, East Germany, Zimbabwe models of "democracy". Not to be confused with a real democracy.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It beggars belief that some of posters continually accusing PDRC of committing acts of violence against themselves. It's absolutely laughable accusation. Why? Anyone who knows Bankokians knows well that they do not condone violence. Furthermore, Bangkokians are afraid of violence. They simply do not like it and stay away from it. Since violent acts started the numbers started dropping. A fact which is difficult to refute.

You're hilarious. Of course they condone violence. Their leader is wanted on charges of ordering people shot dead in cold blood. That and that Bangkokians are afraid of violence is what you base you theory on? Ever wonder why people don't walk around wearing red shirt t-shirts in Bangkok? Because they are afraid to get physically attacked by these yellow fascist thugs, that's why.

Whilst true that such acts would cause the number to drop. It is also true that this was happening just before the grenade attack. And that eventually the numbers would have dropped to today's levels in either case.

The PDRC might not have committed this act against themselves. But they are the ones who have the most to gain from it. That truly is a fact that is difficult to refute.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just watched two videos of the grenade attack on PBS. What was strange on the first video was the speed with which one of the passengers in the truck ran in the direction from where the grenade was allegedly thrown. I would think that most people would react by assisting the people lying injured on the ground. Strange behavior to me.

While all this is being sorted out, my sincere condolences to the family of the man who succumbed to his injuries and to the families of all the wounded. I wish them a speedy recovery.

Ever had a grenade thrown at you? If not, believe me, you can't imagine how you would react. Depends on your previous experiences and background. Maybe the guy who reacted was ex military or law enforcement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It beggars belief that some of posters continually accusing PDRC of committing acts of violence against themselves. It's absolutely laughable accusation. Why? Anyone who knows Bankokians knows well that they do not condone violence. Furthermore, Bangkokians are afraid of violence. They simply do not like it and stay away from it. Since violent acts started the numbers started dropping. A fact which is difficult to refute.

same thing happened at the red gig a few years ago. people were shot and posters were saying the 'reds did it'

I don't like Suthep but it's obviously not them hurting themselves NOR is it the 'government' as Suthep stupidly claims this morning

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It beggars belief that some of posters continually accusing PDRC of committing acts of violence against themselves. It's absolutely laughable accusation. Why? Anyone who knows Bankokians knows well that they do not condone violence. Furthermore, Bangkokians are afraid of violence. They simply do not like it and stay away from it. Since violent acts started the numbers started dropping. A fact which is difficult to refute.

You're hilarious. Of course they condone violence. Their leader is wanted on charges of ordering people shot dead in cold blood. That and that Bangkokians are afraid of violence is what you base you theory on? Ever wonder why people don't walk around wearing red shirt t-shirts in Bangkok? Because they are afraid to get physically attacked by these yellow fascist thugs, that's why.

Whilst true that such acts would cause the number to drop. It is also true that this was happening just before the grenade attack. And that eventually the numbers would have dropped to today's levels in either case.

The PDRC might not have committed this act against themselves. But they are the ones who have the most to gain from it. That truly is a fact that is difficult to refute.

A fact in your own vivid imagination applying your own Western logic.

The fact you have already convicted Suthep of "cold blooded" murder before any trial, somewhat reveals your own political bias which makes your post laughable.

No one in their right mind condones violence. But everyone is capable of it. And, in this country, lives of the non elite are not worth much. Would you trust either side to tell the truth? Poor BiB - easier to blame the mysterious third hand, who just seem to like violence with no actual agenda.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just watched two videos of the grenade attack on PBS. What was strange on the first video was the speed with which one of the passengers in the truck ran in the direction from where the grenade was allegedly thrown. I would think that most people would react by assisting the people lying injured on the ground. Strange behavior to me.

While all this is being sorted out, my sincere condolences to the family of the man who succumbed to his injuries and to the families of all the wounded. I wish them a speedy recovery.

Ever had a grenade thrown at you? If not, believe me, you can't imagine how you would react. Depends on your previous experiences and background. Maybe the guy who reacted was ex military or law enforcement.

No, I have never had a grenade thrown at me but I have been in other situations involving auto accidents where people were seriously injured. As soon as I realized that I wasn't hurt, my first reaction was to see if anyone else was and to assist them if necessary. In my frame of reference and experience, just found it strange -- that's all. Maybe the police or media will find him and interview him. Maybe he saw something that isn't revealed on the video.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Inside the deserted building, an assortment of war weapons was found in a room. Officers from the Army Ordnance Corps entered the building with TV camera crews and protester guards. In addition to the grenade safety pin, they found weapons, including unassembled parts of an M16 assault rifle, according to the pro-opposition Bluesky satellite-based television channel.

The M16 'assault rifle' was a BB gun. The Nation is certainly trying hard to make it appear as though the govt planned the attack to intimidate people (despite the fact protest numbers were falling), yet hasn't questioned why Akanat decided to change the route yesterday morning to go down the road where the attack took place (and then lied that he'd changed the route). I am not blaming either side because there isn't enough evidence for that, but any credible newspaper would have questions to ask about the suspicious goings on, not all of which point towards the government side as culpable.

Where did you find out that it was a BB gun? Verified?

Yes, it was verified.

"Rifles" are BB guns. Other equipment (incl walkie talkies) are out-of-date "consumer" models.

Other websites report that the equipment belong to a security company which has a contract to guard the properties belonging to Chula University, and 2 of their guards use this room to sleep. Hence the dated equipment and BB gun.

It is uncertain whether there is any connection between the guards/this room and the grenade attack.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Inside the deserted building, an assortment of war weapons was found in a room. Officers from the Army Ordnance Corps entered the building with TV camera crews and protester guards. In addition to the grenade safety pin, they found weapons, including unassembled parts of an M16 assault rifle, according to the pro-opposition Bluesky satellite-based television channel.

The M16 'assault rifle' was a BB gun. The Nation is certainly trying hard to make it appear as though the govt planned the attack to intimidate people (despite the fact protest numbers were falling), yet hasn't questioned why Akanat decided to change the route yesterday morning to go down the road where the attack took place (and then lied that he'd changed the route). I am not blaming either side because there isn't enough evidence for that, but any credible newspaper would have questions to ask about the suspicious goings on, not all of which point towards the government side as culpable.

Where did you find out that it was a BB gun? Verified?

Yes, it was verified.

"Rifles" are BB guns. Other equipment (incl walkie talkies) are out-of-date "consumer" models.

Other websites report that the equipment belong to a security company which has a contract to guard the properties belonging to Chula University, and 2 of their guards use this room to sleep. Hence the dated equipment and BB gun.

It is uncertain whether there is any connection between the guards/this room and the grenade attack.

It would be of great benefit to the rest of us for you to identify the source of your information so that a serious discussion on this incident can be more rational and objective. Thank you.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just watched two videos of the grenade attack on PBS. What was strange on the first video was the speed with which one of the passengers in the truck ran in the direction from where the grenade was allegedly thrown. I would think that most people would react by assisting the people lying injured on the ground. Strange behavior to me.

While all this is being sorted out, my sincere condolences to the family of the man who succumbed to his injuries and to the families of all the wounded. I wish them a speedy recovery.

Ever had a grenade thrown at you? If not, believe me, you can't imagine how you would react. Depends on your previous experiences and background. Maybe the guy who reacted was ex military or law enforcement.

No, I have never had a grenade thrown at me but I have been in other situations involving auto accidents where people were seriously injured. As soon as I realized that I wasn't hurt, my first reaction was to see if anyone else was and to assist them if necessary. In my frame of reference and experience, just found it strange -- that's all. Maybe the police or media will find him and interview him. Maybe he saw something that isn't revealed on the video.

Big difference in the contexts. Framing a violent life threatening situation in the context of an auto is very different, and would elicit very different emotional and tacit responses.

You are correct, he may have useful information and should come forward to the police. A normal police service would want to gather as much data and information as possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would think carrying people like they are doing in the pic would be quite harmful to the victims if they are really hurt.

I wouldn't even carry slotted pigs like that. But then again, what do I understand about "care"? As a farang - nothing!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It beggars belief that some of posters continually accusing PDRC of committing acts of violence against themselves. It's absolutely laughable accusation. Why? Anyone who knows Bankokians knows well that they do not condone violence. Furthermore, Bangkokians are afraid of violence. They simply do not like it and stay away from it. Since violent acts started the numbers started dropping. A fact which is difficult to refute.

You're hilarious. Of course they condone violence. Their leader is wanted on charges of ordering people shot dead in cold blood. That and that Bangkokians are afraid of violence is what you base you theory on? Ever wonder why people don't walk around wearing red shirt t-shirts in Bangkok? Because they are afraid to get physically attacked by these yellow fascist thugs, that's why.

Whilst true that such acts would cause the number to drop. It is also true that this was happening just before the grenade attack. And that eventually the numbers would have dropped to today's levels in either case.

The PDRC might not have committed this act against themselves. But they are the ones who have the most to gain from it. That truly is a fact that is difficult to refute.

Sort yourself out mate. First of all, Suthep is not Bangkokian and Bangkokians chose their own governor. To claim that people get attacked in Bangkok only because they were red is sheer lunacy. Considerable number of Bangkoians is originally from Isaan and they openly support PTP. There are numerous billboards around Bangkok promoting YL and PTP candidates, erected by PTP supporters completely undisturbed and unopposed. Grow up. Stop trolling.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

RT @ChadapornLin: Suthep vowed on stage yesterday he will continue his march around Bkk at 10am today despite bombing yesterday

I don't like him and I don't like what he is doing, but he does have balls. Someone threw a bomb at him yesterday.

I don't like him. He does have balls, No one threw a bomb at him. Tragically, in this futile farce, another death...

Why post such nonsense? Read the reports. Someone actually threw a Chinese made hand grenade into the vicinity where he was. Do you think all these reports were made up? Do you think the taxi driver's tragic death just a made up story?

The farce is a very corrupt regime still cling to power albeit in a caretaker capacity and are still fighting like hell to get back on top,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RT @ChadapornLin: Suthep vowed on stage yesterday he will continue his march around Bkk at 10am today despite bombing yesterday

I don't like him and I don't like what he is doing, but he does have balls. Someone threw a bomb at him yesterday.

I don't like him. He does have balls, No one threw a bomb at him. Tragically, in this futile farce, another death...

Why post such nonsense? Read the reports. Someone actually threw a Chinese made hand grenade into the vicinity where he was. Do you think all these reports were made up? Do you think the taxi driver's tragic death just a made up story?

The farce is a very corrupt regime still cling to power albeit in a caretaker capacity and are still fighting like hell to get back on top,

My point is that it was thrown at the protesters. Suthep was either 30 or 200 metres away ( nation, BP). I don't say it wasn't horrible, but it remains very unclear as to who did it and why. Whoever it was does not seem to have been aiming at suthep ( or if they were, with very bad aim). I don't trivilaise the incident...someone died..

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just watched two videos of the grenade attack on PBS. What was strange on the first video was the speed with which one of the passengers in the truck ran in the direction from where the grenade was allegedly thrown. I would think that most people would react by assisting the people lying injured on the ground. Strange behavior to me.

While all this is being sorted out, my sincere condolences to the family of the man who succumbed to his injuries and to the families of all the wounded. I wish them a speedy recovery.

Ever had a grenade thrown at you? If not, believe me, you can't imagine how you would react. Depends on your previous experiences and background. Maybe the guy who reacted was ex military or law enforcement.

No, I have never had a grenade thrown at me but I have been in other situations involving auto accidents where people were seriously injured. As soon as I realized that I wasn't hurt, my first reaction was to see if anyone else was and to assist them if necessary. In my frame of reference and experience, just found it strange -- that's all. Maybe the police or media will find him and interview him. Maybe he saw something that isn't revealed on the video.

Big difference in the contexts. Framing a violent life threatening situation in the context of an auto is very different, and would elicit very different emotional and tacit responses.

You are correct, he may have useful information and should come forward to the police. A normal police service would want to gather as much data and information as possible.

I noted that I was basing my opinion of my own frame of reference and experience. And one of the auto accidents in which I was involved was very serious and resulted in several people being killed. All of us perceive the world through a prism of past experiences and attempting to get as much information as possible. Hope you would agree since I am only offering an observation which has no political motive. Thanks.

Edited by pookiki
Link to comment
Share on other sites

colour me cynical, but i try to apply logic when evaluating such incidents and...

one has to ask who has the most to gain from such an incident at this time? the turn out for the protests has diminished greatly- to the point where you've got maybe 100 people at Asoke, while other 'shut down' intersections were no more. just seems like a very odd time for anyone on the other side to throw petrol on a flame that is dying out on its own. right?

Curious where you're getting your statistics.

I pass by Asoke every night on the way home, and have been posting nightly pictures of the crowds there in a different thread here.

Every night, there have been many thousands at Asoke, including last night. Certainly not 100 as you say.

http://www.thaivisa.com/forum/topic/685198-information-on-protest-sites/?p=7306165

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact you have already convicted Suthep of "cold blooded" murder before any trial, somewhat reveals your own political bias which makes your post laughable.

No one in their right mind condones violence. But everyone is capable of it. And, in this country, lives of the non elite are not worth much. Would you trust either side to tell the truth? Poor BiB - easier to blame the mysterious third hand, who just seem to like violence with no actual agenda.

No, I said he is wanted on charges. Charges that he is evading. Again, if the fascist yellow shirts are so non-violent, how come everyone I ask say they wouldn't wear red shirt t-shirts because they are afraid?

And no, I don't trust any side. I am merely looking at the evidence at hand and forming a conclusion from it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...