webfact Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 YINGLUCK VS SUTHEPSuthep calls for live TV talks with YingluckThe NationBANGKOK: -- Anti-government protest leader Suthep Thaugsuban has challenged Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra to one-on-one talks broadcast live on television in a bid to end the political deadlock.The caretaker PM responded to yesterday's challenge with a condition - she would meet with Suthep if he ended anti-government protests and allowed the uncompleted national election to go ahead."If Khun Yingluck really wants to find a solution through talks, I ask her to make an appointment for a one-on-one meeting with me in an open setting," Suthep told reporters. "The talks should be broadcast live on TV so that the people know what is going on."Suthep, secretary general of the People's Democratic Reform Committee, said the talks should be for the good of the country and not for personal benefit.He said he would not take part in them if former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra benefited.The veteran politician had earlier said he would only talk to Thaksin, Yingluck's elder brother, whom he accused of being behind rampant corruption and abuse of power.Suthep leads a protest movement that aims to bring down the so-called Thaksin regime.Yingluck said she was in favour of negotiations if they were constitutional.She asked Suthep whether he was ready to end the protest to pave the way for the election."Something important that everyone wants is an end to the protests and the election to go ahead," she said from Chiang Mai."If not, we can't tell the world community how we will maintain democracy."This is the main point we have to stick to. I agree in principle to peaceful negotiation."PDRC spokesman Akanat Promphan said the prime minister should not have placed a condition on the talks going ahead if she was sincere. "It seems she does not want the talks to happen," he said.The ruling Pheu Thai Party accused Suthep of having ulterior motives for demanding one-on-one talks broadcast live."In principle, such talks must be held in secret," Pheu Thai spokesman Prompong Nopparit said."Suthep's offer looks as though he wants to have a political debate broadcast live on TV. This would create more problems than lead to a solution."International organisations yesterday voiced support for talks between both sides.United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon again offered to help find a solution to the political crisis. He "expresses his readiness to assist Thailand and the Thai people in any way possible", his spokesman said.Ban's statement came shortly after caretaker Foreign Minister Surapong Tovichakchaikul said he would seek the UN secretary-general's assistance. Surapong said he had spoken with Ban to discuss ways out of the political crisis.Ban has offered his assistance to Thailand on several occasions - including during separate talks with Yingluck and former opposition leader Abhisit Vejjajiva - to end the worsening political violence, which has claimed at least 22 lives including four children.His spokesman quoted Ban as urging the warring parties to engage in dialogue as soon as possible in a meaningful and inclusive way while advancing genuine reform.Meanwhile, the European Union joined other international bodies in expressing deep concern over the situation in Thailand, saying the death of young children was particularly disturbing.Catherine Ashton, the EU's high representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, expressed her deepest sympathy to the families of the victims.She called on all stakeholders involved in the conflict to act with the utmost restraint to prevent any further violence."She reiterates her urgent call for a dialogue leading to a lasting political solution based on democratic principles," Ashton's spokesman said.-- The Nation 2014-02-28 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
webfact Posted February 27, 2014 Author Share Posted February 27, 2014 PM willing to talk to Suthep under constitutional framework BANGKOK, 28 February 2014 (NNT) – Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra has affirmed she is open to negotiations with Secretary-General of the People’s Democratic Reform Committee (PDRC) Suthep Thaugsuban as long as he complies with the Constitution.Following Mr Suthep’s challenge for Ms Yingluck to join him in a televised one-on-one negotiation, the Prime Minister has expressed her willingness to show up for the occasion. Nonetheless, she stressed that the discussion must have a clear direction and adhere to the framework of the charter.If the protest leader’s demands were beyond her constitutional power, the premier said a team of experts must also be present in order to help suggest useful ideas for the benefit of the whole country. As for her demands, she reiterated that Mr Suthep must end the protests and allow the election process to move forward.Regarding a plan of the Center for Maintaining Peace and Order (CMPO) to invite the United Nations to help find solutions for Thailand, Ms Yingluck insisted she was looking forward to hearing the advice although she believed Thai people would eventually need to solve the political problems by themselves.-- NNT 2014-02-28 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soundman Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 One on one debate. Nah, will not happen. Suthep is dreaming. the premier said a team of experts must also be present I will always remember Somchai Wongsawat's earpiece more or less falling out when he was trying to listen to instructions over a vocal crowd. Couldn't imagine any debate with Yingluck will be any different. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Curt1591 Posted February 27, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted February 27, 2014 I think all his other talks, like the ones with generals, should also be broadcast live. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Dr Bruce Posted February 27, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted February 27, 2014 Suthep's pre-conditions for talks. No sharing power with the elected Government. No talking about Elections. And the obvious no Taksin coming home or getting his money. What will he talk about? Maybe he will tell us about his reforms at last. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post chooka Posted February 27, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted February 27, 2014 Now he wants to talk, Yingluk has been pleading with him to talk. Don't turn it into a media circus where he can rant and rave like he does on stage with the other clowns. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thai at Heart Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 They both said this in English? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post TheClog Posted February 27, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted February 27, 2014 Better if runner suthep had face to face talks with the police per his arrest warrant 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post RockyBeerbelly Posted February 28, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted February 28, 2014 <script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script> Better if runner suthep had face to face talks with the police per his arrest warrant ....and better Yingluck had face-to-face meetings with the rice farmers and explain why they aren't paid yet 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockyBeerbelly Posted February 28, 2014 Share Posted February 28, 2014 How about Yinglucks' conditions? Suthep has to adhire to the constitution, BUT he must stop his peaceful demonstration. Isn't that in conflict? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post aussieinthailand Posted February 28, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted February 28, 2014 Amazing, This guy changes his mind more than his underwear, first he will talk then he wont then he wont talk with any government challenges to fist fights, then back again to talks only with Thaksin, now talks only to Yingluk but only if it wont benefit Thaksin, <deleted>??? I think his strategy is if he can't dazzle them with brains, baffle them with bullsh*t your hero has all the commitment of a sponge Let the talks go ahead 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Scamper Posted February 28, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted February 28, 2014 It didn't long for Phue Thai to turn this down, as it would have been disastrous for Yingluck. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CockneyGit Posted February 28, 2014 Share Posted February 28, 2014 If this was to be a genuine political debate, surely it should be Yingluck v Abhisit..?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hawkman Posted February 28, 2014 Share Posted February 28, 2014 I think Suthep and Yingluck's pre demands are pathetic. Just both of them do the live debate, get them to discuss all topics; let's hear it from the horse's mouth on live tv that the Bill won't resurface and that the Government will learn from it's mistakes and rid the corruption and change the rice scheme. Likewise, let's hear your reforms, Suthep! Then come next election time we have video evidence. The only reason she wants the election is to pass the bill through so she and her brother can get off scott free, she doesn't give one monkeys about democracy. Sent from my iPhone using ThaiVisa app 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Baerboxer Posted February 28, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted February 28, 2014 Now he wants to talk, Yingluk has been pleading with him to talk. Don't turn it into a media circus where he can rant and rave like he does on stage with the other clowns. Wrong. Yingluck has been pleading for him to listen. She wants any meeting under her rules and and to be with her supporting cast and in private. Shin transparency at its best. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baerboxer Posted February 28, 2014 Share Posted February 28, 2014 Amazing, This guy changes his mind more than his underwear, first he will talk then he wont then he wont talk with any government challenges to fist fights, then back again to talks only with Thaksin, now talks only to Yingluk but only if it wont benefit Thaksin, <deleted>??? I think his strategy is if he can't dazzle them with brains, baffle them with bullsh*t your hero has all the commitment of a sponge Let the talks go ahead Of course YL and TL never do this There won't be a cabinet re-shuffle We won't dissolve the house the Amnesty bill has been killed, well it won't be brought back, well ......... we'll see Let's talk. no talk. let's talk, no talk, let's talk etc etc ad infinity. YL can't do a debate on her own because she hasn't got a clue. She's a good actress at times, and can sort of read from a script. She certainly doesn't make any decisions. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saltandpepper Posted February 28, 2014 Share Posted February 28, 2014 Now he wants to talk, Yingluk has been pleading with him to talk. Don't turn it into a media circus where he can rant and rave like he does on stage with the other clowns. Where he would be able to expose to the world who the PM really is......a puppet, with no ability to discuss anything without a script! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tatsujin Posted February 28, 2014 Share Posted February 28, 2014 Now he wants to talk, Yingluk has been pleading with him to talk. Don't turn it into a media circus where he can rant and rave like he does on stage with the other clowns. Again, you misrepresent the facts. Yingluck has been calling for talks, yes . . . but only on the condition that the protests are ended immediately and then she will talk. Both sides have "conditions", so stop trying to make out that Yingluck/PT are as pure and honest as the driven snow, it's just not true and anyone with half a brain can see that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aussieinthailand Posted February 28, 2014 Share Posted February 28, 2014 It didn't long for Phue Thai to turn this down, as it would have been disastrous for Yingluck. When did YL turn down talks? would you like to show us your inside information? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toybits Posted February 28, 2014 Share Posted February 28, 2014 The way this article is written makes it look like the PM has set preconditions before agreeing to the one-on-one. It did not even mention that Mr. Suthep had his own preconditions as well. Well, you gotta leave it to The Nation to do the Sheep management. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klauskunkel Posted February 28, 2014 Share Posted February 28, 2014 (edited) They could talk on Facebook, from "fiend" to "friend" in one click... Edited February 28, 2014 by klauskunkel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tezzainoz Posted February 28, 2014 Share Posted February 28, 2014 Suthep's pre-conditions for talks. No sharing power with the elected Government. No talking about Elections. And the obvious no Taksin coming home or getting his money. What will he talk about? Maybe he will tell us about his reforms at last. Mhh this is what the Thai people are protesting about No sharing power with the elected Government. Yes No talking about Elections. Yes we are taling about what need to be done so we can have an election no Taksin coming home or getting his money. the reason this all started What will he talk about? Thailand future and the polices to end corruption this includes both side To be held on Live TV Yes The way is is done in Western democracies Protestor leader Vs PM Yes The way is is done in Western democracies Tasking not to be apart of the talks Yes Yingluck keeps says she is the PM if you are yell ow red or white this seems to be the best way to start this country back on it feet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suriya4 Posted February 28, 2014 Share Posted February 28, 2014 What's the TV going to be called? Beauty and the Beast? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tezzainoz Posted February 28, 2014 Share Posted February 28, 2014 Now he wants to talk, Yingluk has been pleading with him to talk. Don't turn it into a media circus where he can rant and rave like he does on stage with the other clowns. you can always offer your self as a mediator so he can not do this But do you really Believe Taksin will allow her to face the Thai people on her own 10,000 baht to any charity of you choice says she will not 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tezzainoz Posted February 28, 2014 Share Posted February 28, 2014 <script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script> Better if runner suthep had face to face talks with the police per his arrest warrant ....and better Yingluck had face-to-face meetings with the rice farmers and explain why they aren't paid yet Post 8 & 9 cancel each other out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ginjag Posted February 28, 2014 Share Posted February 28, 2014 (edited) Yingluck will not meet anyone for live talks because in plain English she will "let her daft out" She also knows that her pre condition "elections first' will put a stop to it. Why have pre conditions why not be on air and discuss any subject ??? I think Suthep would meet without having any pre conditions, it's only the P.M that would block anything with her --elections excuse. Get BBC Hardtalk in on this with Steve S---or L.S--Janeab. I think Suthep would hold his own, the PM never in a million years -she would to my mind walk out crying. Another twist, leave out Suthep, bring in Abhisit--if he is so bad a guy as some posters think--let them see this 1--to --1. OR anyone on air to talk to her---she would decline every invitation----on the condition elections first. Edited February 28, 2014 by ginjag Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tezzainoz Posted February 28, 2014 Share Posted February 28, 2014 How about Yinglucks' conditions? Suthep has to adhire to the constitution, BUT he must stop his peaceful demonstration. Isn't that in conflict? His protests have already been ruled legal so as Usual if and court ruling is against her This is an illegal ruling ha ha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tezzainoz Posted February 28, 2014 Share Posted February 28, 2014 (edited) Amazing, This guy changes his mind more than his underwear, first he will talk then he wont then he wont talk with any government challenges to fist fights, then back again to talks only with Thaksin, now talks only to Yingluk but only if it wont benefit Thaksin, <deleted>??? I think his strategy is if he can't dazzle them with brains, baffle them with bullsh*t your hero has all the commitment of a sponge Let the talks go ahead Or did he know all the offers made by Yingluck where fake, like all the other words that come out of her mouth In the end he got sick of it so agreed and she proved him right Her offers to talk where always fake, she never had any intention to talk to the Thai people about anything if was had to answer herself Edited February 28, 2014 by tezzainoz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueNoseCodger Posted February 28, 2014 Share Posted February 28, 2014 One on one debate. Nah, will not happen. Suthep is dreaming. the premier said a team of experts must also be present I will always remember Somchai Wongsawat's earpiece more or less falling out when he was trying to listen to instructions over a vocal crowd. Couldn't imagine any debate with Yingluck will be any different. She's can't debate him on TV anyway. The EC will try to ban her if she does. He's not a politician with a political party anymore, so they can't ban Suthep. It's a pity he's not sincere, but it was worth offering talks. It's more telling that Abhisit is all but gone from politics now. You almost never see him, what happened to all the Democrat MPs too? It's like they melted away like snowmen. So on the Democrat side there really isn't anyone who stands for them as a party seeking election now. They're 100% plutocratic power grab now. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tezzainoz Posted February 28, 2014 Share Posted February 28, 2014 If this was to be a genuine political debate, surely it should be Yingluck v Abhisit..?? Looking at what you write You are the 1st person to be totally correct Her true counter part is Abhisit But this would be worse the Suthep Abhisit kept Thailand in the black during the world financial collapse 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now