Jump to content

Inequality in Thai justice system is the root cause of all problems


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

So, Dr. Ukrit Mongkolnavin, was not happy that the courts didn't rule in favour of PTP and the caretaker government.

He hasn't heard of unbiased or professional judgement and rulings.

The system has to be reformed, so in the future, everything suits PTP.

Very distinguished man, and in, no way, politically motivated.

Edited by Costas2008
  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

Law is law.

Justice is justice.

There is no such thing as injustice in the judiciary system.

The law is written by the rich for the rich.

Edited by chotthee
Posted

He's right, in that inequitable application of the law is a huge problem in Thailand, but I rather suspect that he will exempt some obvious examples from his condemnation.

30165323_01_zps055ad1f7.jpg

349523.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Let's face it, abhisit was "on the ball" back in 2006. It was only an electioneering throwaway promise and he didn't do anything about it, but the thought was nice, if insincere.

Judicial reform will be part of the Democrat Party's policies to create a moral society, Abhisit said yesterday.

http://nationmultimedia.com/2006/08/07/headlines/headlines_30010532.php

(Note this was August 2006 and he was on the election campaign for the forthcoming election scheduled for October, an election some posters on here have denied was going to take place or even existed.)

Edited by fab4
Posted

until such time that everyone is considered equal under the law nothing will change, every person that commits a crime or breaks the law has to be treated exactly the same, their financial or community standing has to mean nothing in the eyes of the magistrates, all people have to be treated exactidentically and the law followed to a tee.

Stating the obvious really. I wonder how many 'civilised' countries get close to this - let alone 'developing' countries, especially Southeast Asia.

Posted

So, Dr. Ukrit Mongkolnavin, was not happy that the courts didn't rule in favour of PTP and the caretaker government.

He hasn't heard of unbiased or professional judgement and rulings.

The system has to be reformed, so in the future, everything suits PTP.

Very distinguished man, and in, no way, politically motivated.

Hey Costas, check out his CV, give your 'blue sky' addled brain a rest for a while and read this:

Dr. Ukrit Mongkolnavin

Education::

- LL.B., Thammasat University

- B.S.W., Thammasat University

- LL.D. (Honour), University of Paris, France

Previous Occupation::

Legal Officer

Experience::

1972, 1973, 1977 Dean of the Faculty of Law, Chulalongkorn Unversity

1975 Advisor to the Prime Minister

1976 Vice-Chairman of the National Administrative Reform Assembly

Decorations::

Knight Grand Cordon (Special Class) of the Most Exalted Order of the White Elephant

And what's he been doing for the past 37 years? Riding on his white elephant?

Posted

Let's face it, abhisit was "on the ball" back in 2006. It was only an electioneering throwaway promise and he didn't do anything about it, but the thought was nice, if insincere.

Judicial reform will be part of the Democrat Party's policies to create a moral society, Abhisit said yesterday.

http://nationmultimedia.com/2006/08/07/headlines/headlines_30010532.php

(Note this was August 2006 and he was on the election campaign for the forthcoming election scheduled for October, an election some posters on here have denied was going to take place or even existed.)

An election which would take place a wee bit later than 60 days after the April 2006 elections were annulled, you mean?

So, since Abhisit got to form a government in which the Democrat party was one of the coalition partners with the government having a minimal majority, you think that sweeping reforms could have been made? With UDD protests, Songkhran fun and so? With a lost 2008 which saw Thaksin selected PMs only busy with trying to get their lord and master back, ignoring the Global Financial crisis around them? A crisis the Abhisit government tried to cope with and rather nicely even with all obstruction?

Anyway, even you seem to agree reforms are necessary when you blame Abhisit didn't do anything.

Posted (edited)

I would like to ask the guy that mostly wears red ties why he has not mentioned selective or no law enforcement from the Police as a main reason this country has so many problems...

Edited by Nickymaster
Posted

Let's face it, abhisit was "on the ball" back in 2006. It was only an electioneering throwaway promise and he didn't do anything about it, but the thought was nice, if insincere.

Judicial reform will be part of the Democrat Party's policies to create a moral society, Abhisit said yesterday.

http://nationmultimedia.com/2006/08/07/headlines/headlines_30010532.php

(Note this was August 2006 and he was on the election campaign for the forthcoming election scheduled for October, an election some posters on here have denied was going to take place or even existed.)

To bad you and your lot didn't allow him to do it.

Posted

In Thailand, the "Rule of Law" is directly connected to your bank account and/or family connections. Pure and simple. Mercedes bus stop killer; poor little rich girl who slams into van of uni students & teachers, Red Bull heir, just to name a few.

Is this what you had in mind?

Bild1_zpsa501f2e3.png

  • Like 1
Posted

just have a look of the tiny book that the lawyer use when you have a problem and you will have an idea about how it works....i got amazed !

first they normally use the negociation in court to find a solution beetween parts (what i recomend to do)....if no agreement then who knows.....!

good day and good night

coffee1.gif

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...