webfact Posted April 29, 2014 Posted April 29, 2014 Thawil says he will not report to PM BANGKOK: -- National Security Council secretary-general Thawil Pliensri said today that he would not report to caretaker Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra and would not attend the official handover of job from Lt-Gen Paradorn Patthanathabutr. Nevertheless, he said he was a professional and would not have problem working with the government or the Centre for the Administration of Peace and Order but whether he would be allowed to attend the meetings of the cabinet or CAPO or not would depend on the government and CAPO.Mr Thawil insisted that he could work with all parties concerned and would be ready to help out if requested. He said that his main priority task was to review the security policy in the Deep South and he would carry on with the peace talk process with the separatist groups.With only five months to serve out before his mandatory retirement at the end of September, Mr Thawil vowed to do his best. Source: http://englishnews.thaipbs.or.th/thawil-says-will-report-pm/ -- Thai PBS 2014-04-29 2
Costas2008 Posted April 29, 2014 Posted April 29, 2014 The thorn, is going deeper in the eyes of this government.
Popular Post michaelscottfan Posted April 29, 2014 Popular Post Posted April 29, 2014 It's going to be pretty interesting if the courts try to remove her for moving him given that he's on record for insubordination like this. If they're dumb enough to try, I wonder if they'll be shocked by both her and the world press not acknowledging their rulings anymore. 8
Popular Post h90 Posted April 29, 2014 Popular Post Posted April 29, 2014 It's going to be pretty interesting if the courts try to remove her for moving him given that he's on record for insubordination like this. If they're dumb enough to try, I wonder if they'll be shocked by both her and the world press not acknowledging their rulings anymore. He is the head of an independent agency and Yingluck is care taker PM who might be most probably illegally in office. 8
Popular Post binjalin Posted April 29, 2014 Popular Post Posted April 29, 2014 what a despicable and disloyal 'public' servant unprofessional 12
issanaus Posted April 29, 2014 Posted April 29, 2014 If he manages to get any progress in the South he will have provided a very great service to the Kingdom of Thailand
Popular Post h90 Posted April 29, 2014 Popular Post Posted April 29, 2014 what a despicable and disloyal 'public' servant unprofessional as you say he is a PUBLIC servant not a Shinawatra servant. 15
Popular Post bigbamboo Posted April 29, 2014 Popular Post Posted April 29, 2014 what a despicable and disloyal 'public' servant unprofessional Thawil or Yingluck...? 7
Popular Post michaelscottfan Posted April 29, 2014 Popular Post Posted April 29, 2014 It's going to be pretty interesting if the courts try to remove her for moving him given that he's on record for insubordination like this. If they're dumb enough to try, I wonder if they'll be shocked by both her and the world press not acknowledging their rulings anymore. He is the head of an independent agency and Yingluck is care taker PM who might be most probably illegally in office. Go look at the court ruling: They didn't argue that the PM couldn't move his post, just that they didn't believe her justification and sided with his claim that it was motivated by wanting his position vacant for helping a Shinawatra ally enter a new post, she argued that he was hostile in his post. His recent statements seem to back her claim. 7
slapout Posted April 29, 2014 Posted April 29, 2014 When Thai government officials screw up, they are normally put in an inactive post and bid their time to slither back into the inner circle. The caretaker PM seems to have assumed the role of ''Inactive'', the government in its present state, must seek approval/decisions from numerous other legal/judicial branches, just to carry on. And it appears to have accepted the opposition as having a better chance than they have of solving political problems. The man is going to do what many others, if, in this position would love to do. I have seen no remorse shown for the injustice done to this man, yet there are always some who feel that the boss, no matter how incompentent or in the wrong, must be kowtowed to. They may still practice and support slavery in their little circle of influence, but the circle is continually getting smaller and it will eventually fit their neck, quite nicely. 2
Popular Post Scamper Posted April 29, 2014 Popular Post Posted April 29, 2014 " Nevertheless, he said he was a professional and would not have problem working with the government or the Centre for the Administration of Peace and Order but whether he would be allowed to attend the meetings of the cabinet or CAPO or not would depend on the government and CAPO. " Everybody who has followed this case, particularly since the unanimous Supreme Administrative Court ruling, has found that this man has been frozen out of the Yingluck administration. Yes, they have reinstated him - with regret and a great deal of resistance - but Chalerm made it clear to him that there would be no place for him at CAPO. Remember, this is a man the Yingluck administration summarily dismissed for a Thaksin relative, and spent the next two and half years battling his reinstatement in court. Chalerm's horrible comment to him pretty much summarizes that he has not been asked to participate in either the cabinet or CAPO, though if he were would doubtless distinguish himself as ten times better than any other cabinet minister or ten times better than Chalerm - in his sleep. It needs also to be noted that this man is head of an independent agency. He is not beholden to the prime minister. At the moment, we have a caretaker administration on life-support, and under criminal investigation. Thawil can hold his head up high in comparison. 14
ginjag Posted April 29, 2014 Posted April 29, 2014 what a despicable and disloyal 'public' servant unprofessional --really terrible
Popular Post GentlemanJim Posted April 29, 2014 Popular Post Posted April 29, 2014 < what a despicable and disloyal 'public' servant unprofessional When one could hardly blame him as his loyalty has been kind of stretched to the limits really hasn't it. That aside he owes no loyalty to Yingluck, nor does she deserve it. I just wish you had such high standards and expectations for Yingluck and her Government as you do for everyone else. 6
Popular Post jayboy Posted April 29, 2014 Popular Post Posted April 29, 2014 It's going to be pretty interesting if the courts try to remove her for moving him given that he's on record for insubordination like this. If they're dumb enough to try, I wonder if they'll be shocked by both her and the world press not acknowledging their rulings anymore. He is the head of an independent agency and Yingluck is care taker PM who might be most probably illegally in office. He is an insubordinate official who given his insolence to the Prime Minister would not last ten minutes in Beijing,Moscow,Paris,Tokyo,Jakarta,London,Paris or Washington. 3
winstonc Posted April 29, 2014 Posted April 29, 2014 It's going to be pretty interesting if the courts try to remove her for moving him given that he's on record for insubordination like this. If they're dumb enough to try, I wonder if they'll be shocked by both her and the world press not acknowledging their rulings anymore. He is the head of an independent agency and Yingluck is care taker PM who might be most probably illegally in office. He is an insubordinate official who given his insolence to the Prime Minister would not last ten minutes in Beijing,Moscow,Paris,Tokyo,Jakarta,London,Paris or Washington. were in thailand...treated like <deleted> would you keep your mouth closed...i hope not.
chotthee Posted April 29, 2014 Posted April 29, 2014 I said the same thing once to my boss (who happened to be the MD). I was sack.
The Deerhunter Posted April 29, 2014 Posted April 29, 2014 It's going to be pretty interesting if the courts try to remove her for moving him given that he's on record for insubordination like this. If they're dumb enough to try, I wonder if they'll be shocked by both her and the world press not acknowledging their rulings anymore. He is the head of an independent agency and Yingluck is care taker PM who might be most probably illegally in office. He is an insubordinate official who given his insolence to the Prime Minister would not last ten minutes in Beijing,Moscow,Paris,Tokyo,Jakarta,London,Paris or Washington. Or 5 seconds in North Korea 1
fab4 Posted April 29, 2014 Posted April 29, 2014 < what a despicable and disloyal 'public' servant unprofessional When one could hardly blame him as his loyalty has been kind of stretched to the limits really hasn't it. That aside he owes no loyalty to Yingluck, nor does she deserve it. I just wish you had such high standards and expectations for Yingluck and her Government as you do for everyone else. The problem is that Yingluck is Chair of the NSC so to refuse to report to her is not too professional. Not having reported to the Police to acknowledge to charges of sedition and election obstruction charges probably won't help on the character reference front either. http://englishnews.thaipbs.or.th/nsc-chief-wanted-capo-face-sedition-charge/ Oh and just in case anyone gets the idea that the NSC is "independent" March 6, 2014 Caretaker Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra was today accused by officials of the National Security Council of condoning or abetting criminal acts such as lese majeste and secession. The accusation was made in a statement issued by the NSC officials led by Mr Pornchart Bunnag, NSC deputy secretary-general, which was read at the protest stage of the People’s Democratic Reform Committee at Lumpini park Thursday night. http://englishnews.thaipbs.or.th/nsc-officials-accuse-pm-abetting-criminal-acts/ 2
WhizBang Posted April 29, 2014 Posted April 29, 2014 A very fitting slap in the face to Yingluck. Bravo. 2
rametindallas Posted April 29, 2014 Posted April 29, 2014 It's going to be pretty interesting if the courts try to remove her for moving him given that he's on record for insubordination like this. If they're dumb enough to try, I wonder if they'll be shocked by both her and the world press not acknowledging their rulings anymore. Nothing Thawit does in the present is admissible as evidence in the defense of Ms. Yingluck's crime. Thaksin tried the same ploy in 2008 when he had his wife give back the publicly owned land she had illegally acquired. The thief who steals money is not absolved of the theft because he brings the money back. Also, I doubt the court will be shocked if she doesn't acknowledge their ruling. They will simply order her to be arrested. The world press doesn't give a hoot one way or the other.
gangrel Posted April 29, 2014 Posted April 29, 2014 What a refreshing change. The consummate professional that just wants to get on with work. Splendid decision to focus first on the Deep South. There's hope for Thailand at last.
Baerboxer Posted April 29, 2014 Posted April 29, 2014 It's going to be pretty interesting if the courts try to remove her for moving him given that he's on record for insubordination like this. If they're dumb enough to try, I wonder if they'll be shocked by both her and the world press not acknowledging their rulings anymore. He is the head of an independent agency and Yingluck is care taker PM who might be most probably illegally in office. He is an insubordinate official who given his insolence to the Prime Minister would not last ten minutes in Beijing,Moscow,Paris,Tokyo,Jakarta,London,Paris or Washington. He was kicked out of his job for one reason - to allow a Shin to take over the police. Now after fighting through the courts he has is job back, only for the caretaker administration and their quango CAPO to freeze him out if they can, You think this caretaker PM and her cabinet deserve his respect? He doesn't report to her, her oft reshuffled handpicked cabinet or her unelected fugitive criminal brother. He would last longer in any of the countries you mention than an inept administration controlled by a fugitive crook. All of which does not detract from the fact that the supreme administrative court ruled unanamously he was illegally removed and now the judgement of the constitutional court on the caretaker PM's illegal act is awaited. 1
Baerboxer Posted April 29, 2014 Posted April 29, 2014 < what a despicable and disloyal 'public' servant unprofessional When one could hardly blame him as his loyalty has been kind of stretched to the limits really hasn't it. That aside he owes no loyalty to Yingluck, nor does she deserve it. I just wish you had such high standards and expectations for Yingluck and her Government as you do for everyone else. The problem is that Yingluck is Chair of the NSC so to refuse to report to her is not too professional. Not having reported to the Police to acknowledge to charges of sedition and election obstruction charges probably won't help on the character reference front either. http://englishnews.thaipbs.or.th/nsc-chief-wanted-capo-face-sedition-charge/ Oh and just in case anyone gets the idea that the NSC is "independent" March 6, 2014 Caretaker Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra was today accused by officials of the National Security Council of condoning or abetting criminal acts such as lese majeste and secession. The accusation was made in a statement issued by the NSC officials led by Mr Pornchart Bunnag, NSC deputy secretary-general, which was read at the protest stage of the People’s Democratic Reform Committee at Lumpini park Thursday night. http://englishnews.thaipbs.or.th/nsc-officials-accuse-pm-abetting-criminal-acts/ As chair of the NSC, does she attend as often as she did the rice scheme? Looks like many independent agencies and people of quite differing views have all united with one common aim - hold the Shin Clan accountable for their actions. That's what happens when you piss on everyone else. The get fed up of it. 2
issanaus Posted April 29, 2014 Posted April 29, 2014 General caveat - it was reported in the Thai press so we can rely on accurate reporting and reporters not taking things out of context for headline purposes. If I remember correctly it was the head of Armed forces that TOLD CT-PM that Thawil would be going to work in the south - much to the delight and amusement of some of the peanut gallery here who compared it to being sent to the Eastern front. " He said that his main priority task was to review the security policy in the Deep South and he would carry on with the peace talk process with the separatist groups" This is the 10th anniversary of the shootings at the mosque and security forces are on heighten alert - so given his responsibilities it may not be the best time to be distracted from his task. Reporting to the CT-PM these days often means reporting to CAPO (due to the very frequent absences from BKK to attend to important matters in the north). If we take the example of the other day with the disclosure that voting may occur in Army Barracks when the EC had stated that he was not going to disclosure security arrangements. The release of that information was either for political mileage or to try and create tensions between certain political parties and the armed forces. Given he sensitive nature of his work disclosure to parties who might (on current performance) not act in the appropriate manner would appear prudent. Given that he was sent south by the head of the armed forces and the special arrangements that are in place for that zone it would appear entirely appropriate that he reports directly to the head of the armed forces who can then report to his minister - the acting defence minister and CTPM The other part of his role in the south is the negotiations with the separatist groups - it would not appear that having the appearance of having ethics and being will to stand-up for what he believes right would be detrimental in this task. 1
Popular Post anteater Posted April 29, 2014 Popular Post Posted April 29, 2014 " Nevertheless, he said he was a professional and would not have problem working with the government or the Centre for the Administration of Peace and Order but whether he would be allowed to attend the meetings of the cabinet or CAPO or not would depend on the government and CAPO. " Everybody who has followed this case, particularly since the unanimous Supreme Administrative Court ruling, has found that this man has been frozen out of the Yingluck administration. Yes, they have reinstated him - with regret and a great deal of resistance - but Chalerm made it clear to him that there would be no place for him at CAPO. Remember, this is a man the Yingluck administration summarily dismissed for a Thaksin relative, and spent the next two and half years battling his reinstatement in court. Chalerm's horrible comment to him pretty much summarizes that he has not been asked to participate in either the cabinet or CAPO, though if he were would doubtless distinguish himself as ten times better than any other cabinet minister or ten times better than Chalerm - in his sleep. It needs also to be noted that this man is head of an independent agency. He is not beholden to the prime minister. At the moment, we have a caretaker administration on life-support, and under criminal investigation. Thawil can hold his head up high in comparison. Has it never occurred to you that this guy Thawil was perhaps a "pain in the butt"? I could be wrong and he could be a really honorable guy, but if a boss is saddled with a "pain in the butt", the boss fires them, right? It happens in every business or organisation I've ever been in. Except in Thailand, apparently, where - if you are a pal of the ammart - you get "special treatment". It seems obvious to me that if the electorate votes in a government, then that government has the right to govern pretty much as it wishes within the law. That happens in India, America, Germany, all over Africa, in Indonesia, Israel, the Philippines, etc etc. Only in Thailand, it seems, is everything different. Here, the ammart courts, supported by the PDRC, decide what the elected government can do. What a disgraceful version of "democracy". 3
JAG Posted April 29, 2014 Posted April 29, 2014 A very fitting slap in the face to Yingluck. Bravo. Really can't imagine why she sacked him in the first place! Still, I expect this posturing will get him a job amongst "the good people" if cuddly old Suthep gets to form his appointed government. Sent from my Nexus 7 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app
noitom Posted April 29, 2014 Posted April 29, 2014 What insurgent leader would talk to this Thai guy based on his comments and status? 1
englishoak Posted April 29, 2014 Posted April 29, 2014 Thawil Pliensri said today that he would not report to caretaker Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra and would not attend the official handover of job from Lt-Gen Paradorn Patthanathabutr. Nevertheless, he said he was a professional Hardly 1
gangrel Posted April 29, 2014 Posted April 29, 2014 It seems obvious to me that if the electorate votes in a government, then that government has the right to govern pretty much as it wishes within the law. That happens in India, America, Germany, all over Africa, in Indonesia, Israel, the Philippines, etc etc. Only in Thailand, it seems, is everything different. "within the law" is the bit where Yingluck's government registers a FAIL. She didn't, so, she is seeing the consequences. Same as happens elsewhere. 2
binjalin Posted April 30, 2014 Posted April 30, 2014 < what a despicable and disloyal 'public' servant unprofessional When one could hardly blame him as his loyalty has been kind of stretched to the limits really hasn't it. That aside he owes no loyalty to Yingluck, nor does she deserve it. I just wish you had such high standards and expectations for Yingluck and her Government as you do for everyone else. indeed and nor was I suggesting he had any loyalty to Yingluck it is to the PM he owes his loyalty WHOEVER that may be - that is the professional approach and the high road and, as you well know, I am for anti-corruption, honesty and integrity on ALL sides of the spectrum I, like many others, feel PTP is the "lesser of two evils" during this time of paradigm shift - this time of ordinary Thais wanting to rid themselves of this feudalism - this does not mean that just about all of us do not support reform - it is urgently needed
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now