Jump to content

Cult of Leica


Recommended Posts

For Fim and Sunshine . . . .

In 1914 optical engineer Oskar Barnack was working for Ernst Leitz when he designed the very first Leica, the Leitz Camera, or so-called Ur-Leica. The small handheld camera, one of the first to use 35mm film, finally went into production in 1925 following a long delay caused by World War One. It went on to revolutionise photography in the hands of the first photojournalists who set out to record the world on the brink of change.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-27516384

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing magic about a Leica or any other camera. You stick a lens on it, point it at the subject and shoot. The real magic is about 4 inches behind the viewfinder. That's all that separates one photographer from another.

I believe an Austin Allegro is now a "cult" vehicle........ <deleted>!

Edited by fimgirl
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

^^^ FG...I won't give a "like" to the above post mainly due to

the amount of legal tender certificates needed in hand or

wheelbarrow to purchase the new sets! But the article

sure is interesting!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MJP...I reckon Leica owners are a cult...of sorts...just what sort I haven't

come to a conclusion on yet. The camera isn't a cult per se...it's just

an opto-mechanical contraption of exceptional build quality and so are

the lenses. As an aside...the Voightlander Bessa's & lenses are also

of the same...errrr...nearly the same quality but you rarely see or hear

the people who bought them exclaim loudly..."I just bought a Bessa!!!"

to their mates in the pub...as many new Leica owners have done...

such as myself.

I have concluded that Bessa owners know something Leica owners

don't...one gets the same quality at less dosh with a Bessa. And...

they also hold their value over the years. After all...a camera is just

a tool...same as a roofing hammer in a strange way. Give the hammer

to a 5 year old boy and leave him alone for the day...your home may

be ruined. Put the same hammer in the hands of a stone carver and

you may see something like Mt. Rushmore in a few years...or at least

a new roof on your house if he/she's a carpenter.

After some considerable thought about the cult of Leica in the past few

minutes I realise that we who own them, regardless of which model

or how many...we're all addicted to that astronomically vibrant red circle.

What if that "steal me" red blob wasn't there? Yeah...we'd probably

still have at least one...after all they're touted as the best there ever is

& will be & has been. The red thing wasn't there on early models so

that must say something eh. Back then the Leica was like an Edsel,

a big ugly American car, that had very advanced build & options but

was butt ugly. So butt ugly not even a starving amateur thief would

waste their time. OK the old Leica's were small & not as large as an

Edsel and face it...the old M's were ugly: compared to the other

camera's of today...such as Canon's EOS jobbers all nifty

and smooth and Italian like in design. In fact it was an Italian who

designed the EOS bodies originally & Canon has stuck with that

packaging...sorry...I digress.

Nowadays...people call a simple and functional design "beautiful"

so even an old ugly Leica is beautiful by todays standards of form

and function & Leica has pretty much stayed with that old design.

Save for the new S series cameras and their old R series jobbers

but I will not digress in that direction.

I guess that's why Fuji made their X Pro-1 look so much like a

Leica...there is beauty in simplicity. And other camera makers have

followed suit. Even Nikon remade their old rangefinder camera

& stuck it on the market at Leica prices...the Nikon S3.

My final theory about the Cult of Leica...

It all boils down to that dam_n red dot. It's hyper-hypnotic and tells

a photographer instantly..."YOU WANT ME!"...and the photographer,

at some stage in their life....complies.

Some just comply more than others. Like beer & pistachio's...

one is never enough.

NB...edit to considerably shorten this babble...

Edited by sunshine51
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just for information, the title of the BBC article was 'Cult of Leica'. Being lazy, I just copy 'n paste.

These things are still far too expensive for me. I put a M 240 and three lenses in a basket and it came to £20,000.

LOL!

Edited by MJP
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just for information, the title of the BBC article was 'Cult of Leica'. Being lazy, I just copy 'n paste.

These things are still far too expensive for me. I put a M 240 and three lenses in a basket and it came to £20,000.

LOL!

My response was "tongue in cheek" - I bloody love my Leica's and they're worth every penny.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just for information, the title of the BBC article was 'Cult of Leica'. Being lazy, I just copy 'n paste.

These things are still far too expensive for me. I put a M 240 and three lenses in a basket and it came to £20,000.

LOL!

My response was "tongue in cheek" - I bloody love my Leica's and they're worth every penny.

I still can't afford it. Never will. Oh well. If I'm good in this life, will I have a Leica in the next?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just for information, the title of the BBC article was 'Cult of Leica'. Being lazy, I just copy 'n paste.

These things are still far too expensive for me. I put a M 240 and three lenses in a basket and it came to £20,000.

LOL!

My response was "tongue in cheek" - I bloody love my Leica's and they're worth every penny.

I still can't afford it. Never will. Oh well. If I'm good in this life, will I have a Leica in the next?

You could always save up for a second hand one....????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just for information, the title of the BBC article was 'Cult of Leica'. Being lazy, I just copy 'n paste.

These things are still far too expensive for me. I put a M 240 and three lenses in a basket and it came to £20,000.

LOL!

My response was "tongue in cheek" - I bloody love my Leica's and they're worth every penny.

I still can't afford it. Never will. Oh well. If I'm good in this life, will I have a Leica in the next?

You could always save up for a second hand one....????

They don't seem to lose much value. Which makes them sort of affordable I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What did I say in another thread. Money in the bank, gaining interest and using it daily. Maybe not the camera, but certainly the lenses. The entry route may be to purchase Hexanon, Voigtlander and Zeiss lenses initially. It's the Leica glass that's the killer. I have some of these more affordable lenses and they really are stellar. The Heliar 75mm f2.5 and Hexanon 90mm f2.8 are certainly up to Leica standard at a fraction of the cost, and I have no hesitation in using my Voigtlander 35mm f1.4 for low light stuff.

M240 and VC 35mm F1.4

12795485774_fc8c02c7a8_c.jpg

Just a thought.

Edited by fimgirl
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you really want to try out film rangefinders on the cheap, there are always old Soviet Feds and Zorkis for sale on Ebay. And they are so cheap that it's no great loss if it turns out not to be for you. I have one of each which came to about £50. The Zorki has a pin hole in its shutter, but It looks good on the shelf.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if you would be better served by the likes of AVCamera? Not so flashy, but better service and more discounts?

IQ lab are also a Leica outlet but agree that my preference is AVCamera.

Bit more to view. http://us.leica-camera.com/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.







×
×
  • Create New...