webfact Posted December 3, 2014 Share Posted December 3, 2014 Questions raised over Queen’s ancestry after DNA test on Richard III’s cousinsTests on descendants of last Plantagenet king point to ‘false paternity event’ and reveal he may have been blue-eyed blondMaev KennedyLONDON: -- The bones of the king under the car park have delivered further shocks, 527 years after his death and more than two years after his remains were discovered in Leicester: Richard III was a blue-eyed blond, and the present Queen may not be descended from John of Gaunt and Edward III, the lineage on which the Tudor claim to the throne originated.Five anonymous living donors, all members of the extended family of the present Duke of Beaufort, who claim descent from both the Plantagenets and Tudors through the children of John of Gaunt, gave DNA samples which should have matched Y chromosomes extracted from Richard’s bones. But none did.Since Richard’s identity was proved by his mitochondrial DNA, handed down in an unbroken chain through the female line from his sister to two living relatives, the conclusion is stark: there is a break in the claimed line of Beaufort descent, what the scientists described as “a false paternity event”, which may also affect the ancestry of their distant cousins, the Windsors.The other main finding overturns the most famous images of Richard, including the portrait head reconstructed from his skull that shows him with dark eyes and shoulder length dark hair. The analysis of his DNA gives a 96% probability for blue eyes and a 77% likelihood that he was blond at least in childhood.Full story: http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/dec/02/king-richard-iii-dna-cousins-queen-ancestry-- the guardian 2014-12-03 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pitrevie Posted December 3, 2014 Share Posted December 3, 2014 What a shock given that Charles II spent most of his reign fornicating his way across England and that many of his predecessors and successors did likewise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post PREM-R Posted December 3, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted December 3, 2014 It's great to be able to discuss such things, isn't it 35 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post pitrevie Posted December 3, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted December 3, 2014 We are fortunate that they appointed themselves head of the Church of England. Where would we have been all these years without this moral compass to guide us. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chang_paarp Posted December 3, 2014 Share Posted December 3, 2014 Of course there is no recent history of this sort of thing happening is there? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
draftvader Posted December 3, 2014 Share Posted December 3, 2014 Are we allowed to discuss this? Surely this is the British people's skeletons. It doesn't serve well to point..... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Ulysses G. Posted December 3, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted December 3, 2014 British people have no problems discussing the goings on in my country. 11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seastallion Posted December 3, 2014 Share Posted December 3, 2014 (edited) What a shock given that Charles II spent most of his reign fornicating his way across England and that many of his predecessors and successors did likewise. But this implies a royal woman consorted outside the matrimonial bed. Indeed, Changpaarp. Edited December 3, 2014 by Seastallion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Somtamnication Posted December 3, 2014 Share Posted December 3, 2014 There you go!! I knew all along that Koo Stark was the real queen! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post terryp Posted December 3, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted December 3, 2014 there was a full investigation into this a few years ago and it was found that the TRUE heir to the throne was actually a Brit living in OZ who was a sheep farmer (a huge number of sheep) the investigators offered to fly him to the UK as part of the documentry...he declined The Royal as thery are now have as much right as my stray cat...the name Windsor was only intruduced in around 1938 as they were crapppping themselves of a British backlash with war against GERMANY their cousins. The Queen really gave up soverenty in 1970 or 1972? to brussels as she signed the agreement of laws from Brussels would over power uk laws... so many have no idea what the queen of england controls ...its basicallty the world (crown est and holdings is really run by a group of approx 40 and Lord Rothschild is the main rep) 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post harrry Posted December 3, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted December 3, 2014 Remember the LM laws apply to the head of state of all countries. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeverSure Posted December 3, 2014 Share Posted December 3, 2014 Remember the LM laws apply to the head of state of all countries. I'm scared to death. Maybe someone will report me to Brussels, which is the Head of State of the UK, right? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
halloween Posted December 3, 2014 Share Posted December 3, 2014 The illegitimacy of British royalty is no surprise to antipodeans, reflected in the common endearing description of those from that region. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Kalbo Posted December 3, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted December 3, 2014 Are we allowed to discuss this? Surely this is the British people's skeletons. It doesn't serve well to point..... Speaking as a Brit myself, I imagine that the vast majority of UK folks would be more than willing to discuss this subject. More to the point, it is refreshing to be able to discuss such a subject without fear of repercussion. 11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harrry Posted December 3, 2014 Share Posted December 3, 2014 (edited) Remember the LM laws apply to the head of state of all countries. I'm scared to death. Maybe someone will report me to Brussels, which is the Head of State of the UK, right? No but if one person reports you to the Thai Police they must investigate. Are you sure you only have friends who read this forum? The third group is insult against the Head of State of foreign countries or lèse-majesté. Insulting or threatening the King, Queen, Consort, Heir-apparent or Head of State of foreign countries (Section 133), which is an offence against the friendly relations with foreign states, is punishable by 1 to 7 years imprisonment or a fine of 2,000-140,000 baht, or both http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%C3%A8se_majest%C3%A9_in_Thailand Edited December 3, 2014 by harrry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seastallion Posted December 3, 2014 Share Posted December 3, 2014 (edited) Nice to see you join the discussion on royal b4 stards, Harry. Edited December 3, 2014 by Seastallion 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seastallion Posted December 3, 2014 Share Posted December 3, 2014 Remember the LM laws apply to the head of state of all countries. I'm scared to death. Maybe someone will report me to Brussels, which is the Head of State of the UK, right? No but if one person reports you to the Thai Police they must investigate. Are you sure you only have friends who read this forum? The third group is insult against the Head of State of foreign countries or lèse-majesté. Insulting or threatening the King, Queen, Consort, Heir-apparent or Head of State of foreign countries (Section 133), which is an offence against the friendly relations with foreign states, is punishable by 1 to 7 years imprisonment or a fine of 2,000-140,000 baht, or both http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%C3%A8se_majest%C3%A9_in_Thailand So, all the nasty words about Obama, Abbott, et al, are illegal. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post harrry Posted December 3, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted December 3, 2014 (edited) The third group is insult against the Head of State of foreign countries or lèse-majesté. Insulting or threatening the King, Queen, Consort, Heir-apparent or Head of State of foreign countries (Section 133), which is an offence against the friendly relations with foreign states, is punishable by 1 to 7 years imprisonment or a fine of 2,000-140,000 baht, or both http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%C3%A8se_majest%C3%A9_in_Thailand So, all the nasty words about Obama, Abbott, et al, are illegal. Obama I do not know about but Abbott is not and I hope never will be a head of state the arrogant bast,.d and dick head he is. Edited December 3, 2014 by harrry 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harryfrompattaya Posted December 3, 2014 Share Posted December 3, 2014 (edited) What a shock given that Charles II spent most of his reign fornicating his way across England and that many of his predecessors and successors did likewise. Soon Prince Charles who is a Muslims shall claim his DNA is linked to Muhammad and he shall Lead England as a Muslim State Please remember England was once a Catholic Country Edited December 3, 2014 by harryfrompattaya Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Posted December 3, 2014 Share Posted December 3, 2014 Let's try to keep this roughly on topic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harrry Posted December 3, 2014 Share Posted December 3, 2014 What a shock given that Charles II spent most of his reign fornicating his way across England and that many of his predecessors and successors did likewise. Soon Prince Charles who is a Muslims shall claim his DNA is linked to Muhammad and he shall Lead England as a Muslim State Please remember England was once a Catholic Country Actually he is a heir of the prophet through the Moorish connection to the Royal Families of europe. That is why no true muslim would dare harm them, their are a lot of ignorant people round claiming to be muslim though, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
casualbiker Posted December 3, 2014 Share Posted December 3, 2014 British people have no problems discussing the goings on in my country. And British people don't have a problem with other people talking about goings on in MY country either! By the way I'm British! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post mickyboy Posted December 3, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted December 3, 2014 What a shock given that Charles II spent most of his reign fornicating his way across England and that many of his predecessors and successors did likewise. Soon Prince Charles who is a Muslims shall claim his DNA is linked to Muhammad and he shall Lead England as a Muslim State Please remember England was once a Catholic Country thank god for henry the 8th and as for charlie being muslim he dont have to be as in about lets say 100 years the uk will be muslim majority my reason is that most people who want to come to the uk are from pakistan afghanistan romania iran iraq to join there freinds here muslims i live in london and in the past 5 years have seen 3 new mosques built within 10 miles each other think that says it and they breed like rats 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Christmas13 Posted December 3, 2014 Share Posted December 3, 2014 What a shock given that Charles II spent most of his reign fornicating his way across England and that many of his predecessors and successors did likewise. Soon Prince Charles who is a Muslims shall claim his DNA is linked to Muhammad and he shall Lead England as a Muslim State Please remember England was once a Catholic Country thank god for henry the 8th and as for charlie being muslim he dont have to be as in about lets say 100 years the uk will be muslim majority my reason is that most people who want to come to the uk are from pakistan afghanistan romania iran iraq to join there freinds here muslims i live in london and in the past 5 years have seen 3 new mosques built within 10 miles each other think that says it and they breed like rats Get your facts right Romania is 81% Christians Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sprq Posted December 3, 2014 Share Posted December 3, 2014 Remember the LM laws apply to the head of state of all countries. I'm scared to death. Maybe someone will report me to Brussels, which is the Head of State of the UK, right? I don't detect a brainless UKIP voter, do I? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kamahele Posted December 3, 2014 Share Posted December 3, 2014 (edited) Interesting topic. The responses were mostly off topic though. Isn't possession 9/10 of the law? If so, the queen of the British Empire has nothing to worry about no matter what her pedigree. Tongue in cheek. Edited December 3, 2014 by kamahele Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sprq Posted December 3, 2014 Share Posted December 3, 2014 Remember the LM laws apply to the head of state of all countries. I'm scared to death. Maybe someone will report me to Brussels, which is the Head of State of the UK, right? No but if one person reports you to the Thai Police they must investigate. Are you sure you only have friends who read this forum? The third group is insult against the Head of State of foreign countries or lèse-majesté. Insulting or threatening the King, Queen, Consort, Heir-apparent or Head of State of foreign countries (Section 133), which is an offence against the friendly relations with foreign states, is punishable by 1 to 7 years imprisonment or a fine of 2,000-140,000 baht, or both http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%C3%A8se_majest%C3%A9_in_Thailand I seem to recall rampant Bush-bashing -- quite right, of course -- by both Thais and foreigners back in those wonderful neo-con days of the early 2000s with nobody getting arrested, so I wouldn't worry too much about this law. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
casualbiker Posted December 3, 2014 Share Posted December 3, 2014 What a shock given that Charles II spent most of his reign fornicating his way across England and that many of his predecessors and successors did likewise.Soon Prince Charles who is a Muslims shall claim his DNA is linked to Muhammad and he shall Lead England as a Muslim StatePlease remember England was once a Catholic Country thank god for henry the 8th and as for charlie being muslim he dont have to be as in about lets say 100 years the uk will be muslim majority my reason is that most people who want to come to the uk are from pakistan afghanistan romania iran iraq to join there freinds here muslims i live in london and in the past 5 years have seen 3 new mosques built within 10 miles each other think that says it and they breed like rats Get your facts right Romania is 81% Christians That's probably because the Romanian Muslims have moved to London England :-D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smurkster Posted December 3, 2014 Share Posted December 3, 2014 <script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script> Remember the LM laws apply to the head of state of all countries. maybe so but, I doubt anyone is going to get prosecuted for discussing Liz and family.... Thank God some of us come from Free countries 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post smotherb Posted December 3, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted December 3, 2014 There you go!! I knew all along that Koo Stark was the real queen! Absolutely false, Elton John is The Queen of England 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now