Jump to content

Domestic tourism projected to generate Bt772 billion revenue this year


webfact

Recommended Posts

Domestic tourism projected to generate Bt772 billion revenue this year
By Digital Content

14238122008206-640x390x1.jpg

BANGKOK, Feb 13 -- Thailand's Kasikorn Research Centre, KResearch, projects that the government's "12 Cities You Can't Say NO To" project, a part of its Discover Thainess 2015 campaign, together with improved taxing measure to stimulate more domestic tourism by Thais would help to generate over 772 billion baht of revenue.

KResearch is expecting the provinces included in the "12 Cities You Can't Say NO To" project--Lampang, Nan, Phetchabun, Loei, Samut Songkram, Ratchaburi, Trat, Chanthaburi, Chumpon, Trang and Nakhon Sri Thammarat -- to earn revenue of around Bt3.5 billion, as the project would encourage the growth of visitor numbers and spending in the area, which would in turn improve local tourism and relevant business in each province.

The research further predicted that, with the government's scheme to encourage more domestic tourism by the people by using travel expenses to reduce individual income tax, more Thais would travel within the country, generating a revenue of about Bt772 billion for domestic business, which is higher than 2014's Bt705 billion targeted revenue.

The centre said the highest growth in domestic tourism would be seen in the northern, northeastern or Isarn, and in the southern regions, with tourists in all three regions cumulatively accounting for more than half of the total of visitors for the whole year. (MCOT online news)

tnalogo.jpg
-- TNA 2015-02-13

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They can't afford holidays you dimwits because of all that debt succeeding Governments keep getting them into. I've got sixteen inlaws and only one of them has ever had a holiday, and that was a coach trip with workmates running around Temples further South giving money away to religion. The majority of them work, eat and sleep worrying all the while about 'collecting money' for when they get older or sick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You see, what I don't understand is this. If I'm Thai and a 'tourist' I visit another town or city and spend my money on food etc. Now, the place I left is not getting any money from me for food etc!.

So, how do they calculate this huge sum? It can't be simply hotels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script>

You see, what I don't understand is this. If I'm Thai and a 'tourist' I visit another town or city and spend my money on food etc. Now, the place I left is not getting any money from me for food etc!.

So, how do they calculate this huge sum? It can't be simply hotels.

I'd say the Motorway and roadside shops would do well , we have to stop every hour to get food when we drive anywhere

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No no no no no no no no no no no no !

No sums it up....saying domestic tourism generates revenue is actually economic incest that only redistributes existing GDP instead of increasing it. TAT has no legitimate business promoting special interests domestically. Their job is to increase inbound arrivals and let the domestic destinations compete for the incremental lift and domestic baht.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You see, what I don't understand is this. If I'm Thai and a 'tourist' I visit another town or city and spend my money on food etc. Now, the place I left is not getting any money from me for food etc!.

So, how do they calculate this huge sum? It can't be simply hotels.

Finally, somebody that gets it. And locals are less inclined to stay in hotels of any consequence unless traveling on a business expense account.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Possibly, the idea is that relatively affluent people in Bangkok could be encouraged to travel and inject some of their savings into the economy, in places where the result might be beneficial.

but this....?

"The research further predicted that, with the government's scheme to encourage more domestic tourism by the people by using travel expenses to reduce individual income tax,..."

Ah, a tax break for the rich. It all makes sense now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.







×
×
  • Create New...