Jump to content

Marriage play leads to rape involving boy, 15 and girl, eight


Thaivisa News

Recommended Posts

just ordained n as Buddhist novice;

its not as if there an overabundance of monk role models to follow.

the ones with notoriety typically via corruption with or with pedophilia, statutory rape. did i miss anything?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just cut this persons nuts off, problem solved.

I hear ISIS has job openings for people with your outlook...

touché

One can be assured I will not go to Chao Lao Beach if punishments like this are administered by the government.

Edited by djjamie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ang Thong police superintendent Colonel Chutrakool Yosmadee said he would review the report from social workers before drawing a conclusion on charging and prosecuting the boy.

What the hell does a social worker have to do with charging someone who rapes an eight year old child? The charges or lack thereof will probably rely on the usual money factor.

Because the fact is that both parties involved are children.

I believe that many kids are picking up this type of behaviour from online influences considering that hard core pornography and porn sites can be easily accessed by children. It is the parents responsibility to control and take interest in what their children are viewing online.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

only the medical report should be considered in regards to a rape of an eight year old girl and investigate why he did so only after returning from a temple stay .

because watching there porn day and night?

Makes me wonder what kind of abuse the 15 year old may have encountered during his novice exercises at the temple. Seems to me that he thought make belief marriage made actual foreplay and eventual intercourse acceptable. 15 years old neighbours and playmates??? What is the mental age of the 15 year old. Geez!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just cut this persons nuts off, problem solved.

Maybe also try to understand what happened, why, what led to it to be able to prevent similar to happen elsewhere?

I would add, without any excuse for nor lessened consequence, that I'd like to investigate further to find out if the boy had been molested himself earlier in life. In this case, follow the family.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The original post which quotes no source or author says that a father says that a teacher says that a girl says that she doesn't feel well because she was playing a game with her cousin before school and her genitals got hurt.

and the general consensus here is that we should wait another year for the boys testicles to drop so we can cut them off .

do you people ever ask questions about the information you are given?

if not PM me I have several bridges for sale at discounted prices, also I know a Nigerian prince that needs help getting money out of his country, and several contacts apparently from the FBI and CIA that want to get large sums of money they found out of the USA (at least that is what the emails say)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see many calls to remove the nuts from the boy , rather stupid, counterproductive and small, narrow minded response, the boy is only 15, he has just found out that it is not just for pissing out of , what this young lad needs is serious help and sooner he gets it the better females around him will be , there are specialist organisations within the health department that are there to help, what you don't want is just a penalty without any effort to rehabilitate the lad.coffee1.gif

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My guess is that the boy just returned from temple is filler for the story? As far as this happening in rural Thailand it happens in Bangkok as well. I was on Bangkok juvenile court once and just before an upcoming case the father was heard talking to the prosecutor, he was saying "It was the other three boys that did that (rape) the girl, my boy never touched her he was just their watching. Let him go he not do anything". It is this kind of attitude that propels the problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see many calls to remove the nuts from the boy , rather stupid, counterproductive and small, narrow minded response, the boy is only 15, he has just found out that it is not just for pissing out of , what this young lad needs is serious help and sooner he gets it the better females around him will be , there are specialist organisations within the health department that are there to help, what you don't want is just a penalty without any effort to rehabilitate the lad.coffee1.gif

Sometimes, naivete is endearing, sometimes it is dangerous. Yours is the dangerous sort.

I am certain that he has known for quite some time that his penis is not just for pissing out of.

He groomed her. He'd been planning it for weeks, if not months.

I don't know if his temple stay had significance or not, and it may be beside the point.

What is plain is that he committed pre-meditated rape, and what is likely is that he knew it was wrong.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

only the medical report should be considered in regards to a rape of an eight year old girl and investigate why he did so only after returning from a temple stay .

Looking at past events, maybe he got the idea from the monks.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The child play turned foul around late January after the boy returned home from a temple stay following his ordination as Buddhist novice.
With all that's been going on lately, you kind of have to wonder whether the teenager's initiation at the temple involved something other than just Buddhism.
A mere coincidence of timing to the rape, or, another case in the well-established pattern of an abused person later becoming an abuser?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ang Thong police superintendent Colonel Chutrakool Yosmadee said he would review the report from social workers before drawing a conclusion on charging and prosecuting the boy.

What the hell does a social worker have to do with charging someone who rapes an eight year old child? The charges or lack thereof will probably rely on the usual money factor.

typical US attitude -> shoot first, think later (or never). your Avator shows.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ang Thong police superintendent Colonel Chutrakool Yosmadee said he would review the report from social workers before drawing a conclusion on charging and prosecuting the boy.

What the hell does a social worker have to do with charging someone who rapes an eight year old child? The charges or lack thereof will probably rely on the usual money factor.

typical US attitude -> shoot first, think later (or never). your Avator shows.....

Now, now my friend let's not be rude. I take it from your curse response to my post that English is not your first language but that's ok. I took one year of Spanish in school but I still have problems understanding the intent of some statements made in Spanish.

Please refer to my post #19 for a clarification of my statement. In case you decide not to do that, here is the meaning of my statement.

Raping an eight year old girl is a crime. Raping an eight year old girl is never not a crime. It is not in the realm of a social worker's responsibility to say if a rapist should be charged for the crime or not. It is in the realm of the social worker's responsibility to help point out the circumstances leading up to the rape and give suggestions how to prevent the same thing happening in the future.

You have also misinterpreted my Avatar but that is ok also. One of my hobbies is collecting guns. I have an extensive collection dating back to the US civil war era. The S&W 357 magnum in the Avatar is the same as the one I have which by the way has never been fired.

Hopefully this will clear things up for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ang Thong police superintendent Colonel Chutrakool Yosmadee said he would review the report from social workers before drawing a conclusion on charging and prosecuting the boy.

What the hell does a social worker have to do with charging someone who rapes an eight year old child? The charges or lack thereof will probably rely on the usual money factor.

typical US attitude -> shoot first, think later (or never). your Avator shows.....

Now, now my friend let's not be rude. I take it from your curse response to my post that English is not your first language but that's ok. I took one year of Spanish in school but I still have problems understanding the intent of some statements made in Spanish.

Please refer to my post #19 for a clarification of my statement. In case you decide not to do that, here is the meaning of my statement.

Raping an eight year old girl is a crime. Raping an eight year old girl is never not a crime. It is not in the realm of a social worker's responsibility to say if a rapist should be charged for the crime or not. It is in the realm of the social worker's responsibility to help point out the circumstances leading up to the rape and give suggestions how to prevent the same thing happening in the future.

You have also misinterpreted my Avatar but that is ok also. One of my hobbies is collecting guns. I have an extensive collection dating back to the US civil war era. The S&W 357 magnum in the Avatar is the same as the one I have which by the way has never been fired.

Hopefully this will clear things up for you.

You seem to be confused with the crime alleged here it is not rape it is statutory rape this used to be called carnal knowledge in most western countries.

obviously his first language is English and sadly the shoot first, think later is the attitude portrayed by the US in general.

Even your posts suggest a lack of thought or knowledge. A social worker is far more appropriate person to interview children then a police officer and the police forces in Australia employ such people for just such purposes.

Even this poorly written article suggests the only evidence so far is hearsay and an inconclusive medical report, if a crime has been commited and if there is hope of prosecution then the children's and the social workers testimonies are going to be pivotal in that court case.

As for misinterpreting your avatar... it is a gun, a revolver, a large calibre, designed to take a large charge , it is designed primarily to kill people, although it can also be used for shooting bears it's primary design was in fact to provide "stopping power". as for the rest of your human killing collection, even you use the civil war as a reference to time rather then using the world wide accepted method of stating a year of the oldest weapon in your collection.

Don't get me wrong I like guns too, as you can see from my avatar but I am not seriously suggesting using a machine gun will open an image that has otherwise failed to open or that a gun is designed for that purpose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see many calls to remove the nuts from the boy , rather stupid, counterproductive and small, narrow minded response, the boy is only 15, he has just found out that it is not just for pissing out of , what this young lad needs is serious help and sooner he gets it the better females around him will be , there are specialist organisations within the health department that are there to help, what you don't want is just a penalty without any effort to rehabilitate the lad.coffee1.gif

Sometimes, naivete is endearing, sometimes it is dangerous. Yours is the dangerous sort.

I am certain that he has known for quite some time that his penis is not just for pissing out of.

He groomed her. He'd been planning it for weeks, if not months.

I don't know if his temple stay had significance or not, and it may be beside the point.

What is plain is that he committed pre-meditated rape, and what is likely is that he knew it was wrong.

why are you so sure ?

Are you aware of the average age of puberty in Thai boys brought up in villages ?

Do you know him personally ?

How have you determined "grooming" from this article ?

This article does not claim that rape has been committed nor even alleged, the alleged charge is statutory rape, or in simple language sex with a child, the same charge would apply if the boy was 5 years old although then both the boy and girl could be charged.

Although it is clear in your mind what happened legal systems tend to require proof and not " because some guy on a forum said so" before a conviction

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its very normal for 15 year old boys to want to have sex,

With 15 year old girls

This was not sex, this was assault and likely also, kidnapping.

The 15 year old, who is likely at his 95% adult height, was clearly with a child.

That no arrest has been made, could very well mean, as an 8 year old, she actually was manipulated into believing him

No different than any other rapist.

Take off his balls?

No, leave the balls, take off the dick,

Let him have the hormones, and be on the receiving end the rest of his life

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this is ridiculously sick

they should remove the balls of the perpertrator!

Perhaps it would also be appropriate to question the boy about what he was taught and/or experienced at the temple. Did the monks teach him about "marriage play"? If so, perhaps it is the monks who should have "cosmetic" surgery. coffee1.gifwhistling.gif

Edited by Traveling Sailor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

only the medical report should be considered in regards to a rape of an eight year old girl and investigate why he did so only after returning from a temple stay .

They teach a lot in temples these days... doesn't matter if it's catholic or buddhist, you can never be sure off men that have to swear celibacy and wear robes...

celibate, sure. but what about spanking the monkey, is it outlawled??

maybe he could not handle the pent up frustration his new spiritual endeavor placed upon him.

i remember when i was that age. the monkey got more then its due, and i was worshipping satan with all kinds of animal sacrifice.

Edited by fey
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ang Thong police superintendent Colonel Chutrakool Yosmadee said he would review the report from social workers before drawing a conclusion on charging and prosecuting the boy.

What the hell does a social worker have to do with charging someone who rapes an eight year old child? The charges or lack thereof will probably rely on the usual money factor.

Because the fact is that both parties involved are children.

I believe that many kids are picking up this type of behaviour from online influences considering that hard core pornography and porn sites can be easily accessed by children. It is the parents responsibility to control and take interest in what their children are viewing online.

Yes, Grandpa...before internet- porn, no Thai- girl ever got raped and no teenager ever got pregnant!

coffee1.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ang Thong police superintendent Colonel Chutrakool Yosmadee said he would review the report from social workers before drawing a conclusion on charging and prosecuting the boy.

What the hell does a social worker have to do with charging someone who rapes an eight year old child? The charges or lack thereof will probably rely on the usual money factor.

typical US attitude -> shoot first, think later (or never). your Avator shows.....

Now, now my friend let's not be rude. I take it from your curse response to my post that English is not your first language but that's ok. I took one year of Spanish in school but I still have problems understanding the intent of some statements made in Spanish.

Please refer to my post #19 for a clarification of my statement. In case you decide not to do that, here is the meaning of my statement.

Raping an eight year old girl is a crime. Raping an eight year old girl is never not a crime. It is not in the realm of a social worker's responsibility to say if a rapist should be charged for the crime or not. It is in the realm of the social worker's responsibility to help point out the circumstances leading up to the rape and give suggestions how to prevent the same thing happening in the future.

You have also misinterpreted my Avatar but that is ok also. One of my hobbies is collecting guns. I have an extensive collection dating back to the US civil war era. The S&W 357 magnum in the Avatar is the same as the one I have which by the way has never been fired.

Hopefully this will clear things up for you.

You seem to be confused with the crime alleged here it is not rape it is statutory rape this used to be called carnal knowledge in most western countries.

obviously his first language is English and sadly the shoot first, think later is the attitude portrayed by the US in general.

Even your posts suggest a lack of thought or knowledge. A social worker is far more appropriate person to interview children then a police officer and the police forces in Australia employ such people for just such purposes.

Even this poorly written article suggests the only evidence so far is hearsay and an inconclusive medical report, if a crime has been commited and if there is hope of prosecution then the children's and the social workers testimonies are going to be pivotal in that court case.

As for misinterpreting your avatar... it is a gun, a revolver, a large calibre, designed to take a large charge , it is designed primarily to kill people, although it can also be used for shooting bears it's primary design was in fact to provide "stopping power". as for the rest of your human killing collection, even you use the civil war as a reference to time rather then using the world wide accepted method of stating a year of the oldest weapon in your collection.

Don't get me wrong I like guns too, as you can see from my avatar but I am not seriously suggesting using a machine gun will open an image that has otherwise failed to open or that a gun is designed for that purpose.

Thank you sir for responding to my post. Debate is a healthy thing.I fully understand the difference in different kinds of rape including statutory rape. I also understand the roles and responsibilities of Social workers. I have personal knowledge as my grandson was horrifically molested by a male camp leader named Peter Newman at a "Christian sports camp" in Bronson, Missouri called Kanakuk Camp. Newman was convicted of statutory sodomy and is now serving two life sentences plus thirty years. My grandson was not the only one he "groomed" and molested. For details Google Peter Newman Kanakuk camp. I also posted about this in a previous thread. Feel free to do a search and you will find it.

Subsequent to his arrest there was indeed a joint investigation by the police and Social Services which is the correct thing to do. Police did not initially contact Social Services to inquire if they should arrest Newman which is the point I was trying to make in my post. Evidently I should have explained my position more clearly. The police and the Social Services worked hand in hand gathering information and pretrial evidence. Social Services also worked with the families of the victims including my son and his family apart from the joint investigation with the police.I agree with your statement social workers' testimonies are pivotal to this type of court case.

I like your description "human killing collection". Quite original I might say. And to put your mind at ease about the civil war era reference, the oldest gun in my collection is a Confederate Enfield percussion musket .577 caliber with 1862 stamped on the lock plate.

Forgive me but I have no idea what you mean about opening an image in your final statement.

post-162723-0-12738200-1426060503_thumb.

Edited by Pimay1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...