Jump to content

Oklahoma orders stay of execution over drug error


webfact

Recommended Posts

Oklahoma orders stay of execution over drug error

606x341_314444.jpg

OKLAHOMA: -- Convicted criminal Richard Glossip has been granted a stay of execution by Oklahoma’s governor due to uncertainty over the drugs to be used in the lethal injection.

Prison officials had received potassium acetate for use in his execution but state guidelines only list potassium chloride.

Glossip has been found guilty of hiring a hit man to murder a motel owner.

“The Governor has granted a stay of execution for Richard Eugene Glossip until next month. This will allow us time to review the current drug protocol, “ announced Director of Department of Corrections, Robert Patton.

Oklahoma’s drugs procedures have been under scrutiny since a flawed execution in April 2014.
That is when a prisoner struggled for 43 minutes before eventually dying, after an intravenous line had been improperly placed.

euronews2.png
-- (c) Copyright Euronews 2015-10-01

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is the problem with the baboons,,It doesn't matter about the name and legality of the drug they use,,, If it does the job give it to the bastard.

Why are you insulting baboons? The stupidity of the Oklahoma idiots and supporters like you is uncommon in the civilized world that abolished xeath penalty long ago. Worse, than that: Yes, he was convicted. It doesn't mean he did it. Read this http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/richard-glossip-and-the-end-of-the-death-penalty. I haven't found a reliable statistic about the percentage of innocent convicts tortured to death by some States. My guess is 10%.

Your Jesus weeps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is the problem with the baboons,,It doesn't matter about the name and legality of the drug they use,,, If it does the job give it to the bastard.

Hmmm! You call him a bastard. I suggest you read the case history here. http://www.newyorker...-death-penalty

According to the BBC and Yahoo, there is absolutely no physical evidence against this man.

He was named by the person already convicted of the murder in exchange for a prison sentence instead of death penalty.

Another inmate has sworn that the actual killer had told him that he falsely stitched him up to avoid execution.

Do you really think this guilty verdict is safe?

Do you really he should be killed based on this evidence alone? (and there is no other evidence).

He would not even have been convicted on this feeble evidence in Europe as the convicted killer's statement against him would not have been permitted in court.

Justice????????? I'm glad I don't live in that country.

Edited by hugh2121
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.







×
×
  • Create New...