Jump to content

White officer won't face charges in killing of Cleveland boy


webfact

Recommended Posts

White officer won't face charges in killing of Cleveland boy
By MARK GILLISPIE

CLEVELAND (AP) — A grand jury Monday declined to indict a white rookie police officer in the killing of 12-year-old Tamir Rice, a black youngster who was shot while playing with what turned out to be a pellet gun.

In explaining the decision, Cuyahoga County prosecutor Tim McGinty said it was "indisputable" that the boy was drawing the pistol from his waistband when he was gunned down. McGinty said Tamir was trying to either hand the weapon over to police or show them it wasn't real, but the officer and his partner had no way of knowing that.

"Simply put, given this perfect storm of human error, mistakes and miscommunications by all involved that day, the evidence did not indicate criminal conduct by police," McGinty said. He said patrolman Timothy Loehmann was justified in opening fire: "He had reason to fear for his life."

Tamir's family condemned the decision but echoed the prosecutor in urging those disappointed to express themselves "peacefully and democratically." Barricades were set up outside a Cleveland courthouse in case of protests, and about two dozen people gathered in the cold rain at the recreation center where Tamir was shot, some holding signs with photos of the boy and others killed by police in the U.S.

A grainy surveillance-camera video of the boy's November 2014 shooting provoked outrage nationally, and together with other killings of black people by police in places such as Ferguson, Missouri, and New York City, it helped fuel the Black Lives Matter movement.

There was no immediate comment from Loehmann or his partner, who was not charged either.

Tamir was gunned down by Loehmann within two seconds of the officer's police cruiser skidding to a stop near the boy. Loehmann and his white training partner, Frank Garmback, were responding to a 911 call about a "guy" waving a gun and pointing it at people.

Tamir was carrying a borrowed airsoft gun that looks like an actual firearm but shoots nonlethal plastic pellets. It was missing the orange tip that is supposed to show that it is not a real weapon.

The grand jury had been hearing evidence and testimony since mid-October.

In detailing the decision not to bring charges, McGinty said police radio personnel contributed to the tragedy by failing to pass along the "all-important fact" that the 911 caller said the gunman was probably a youngster and the gun probably wasn't real.

Assistant Prosecutor Matthew Meyer said it was "extremely difficult" to tell the difference between the pellet gun and a real one. And he said Tamir was big for his age — 5-foot-7 and 175 pounds, with a men's XL jacket and size-36 pants — and could have easily passed for someone much older.

McGinty also noted that the neighborhood has a history of violence and that a short distance away are memorials to two Cleveland police officers who were shot to death in the line of duty.

"There have been lessons learned already. It should never happen again, and the city has taken steps so it doesn't," McGinty said.

The Cleveland police department plans to put dashboard cameras in every car, and all patrol officers have been equipped with bodycams since September. Also, the police reached a settlement with the U.S. Justice Department earlier this year to overhaul policies on the use of force. The settlement was prompted largely by a car chase that ended with the killing of a couple in a 137-shot barrage of police gunfire.

In a statement, Tamir's family said it was "saddened and disappointed by this outcome — but not surprised." It accused the prosecutor of "abusing and manipulating the grand jury process to orchestrate a vote against indictment."

Among other things, the family charged that McGinty improperly hired use of-force experts to tell the grand jury that Loehmann's actions were reasonable.

The family renewed its request for the U.S. Justice Department to step in and conduct "a real investigation." Federal prosecutors in Cleveland noted Monday that a civil rights investigation into the shooting is already underway.

Also, Mayor Frank Jackson said the city and police department will conduct an internal review that could result in disciplinary action against the two officers, who have been taken off street duty since the shooting.

In addition, Tamir's family has filed a federal civil rights lawsuit against the two officers and the city.

McGinty said it was a "tough conversation" with Tamir's mother when she was told there would be no charges. "She was broken up, and it was very hard," the prosecutor said.

Loehmann opened fire from a distance estimated at 4½ to 7 feet, getting off two shots and missing with one of them.

"With his hands pulling the gun out and his elbow coming up, I knew it was a gun and it was coming out. I saw the weapon in his hands coming out of his waistband and the threat to my partner and myself was real and active," Loehmann told investigators.

After the boy's killing, it was learned that Loehmann had washed out from the police force in the Cleveland suburb of Independence. Loehmann was "dismal" with a handgun, broke down in tears at the gun range and was emotionally immature, according to files. He quit the force before he could be fired.

Steve Loomis, the head of Cleveland's police union, said the organization is pleased with the grand jury's finding but said the decision "is no cause for celebration, and there will be none."

McGinty urged those who disagree with the grand jury decision to react peacefully, and said: "It is time for the community and all of us to start to heal."

Outside the recreation center, protesters chanted, "No justice, no peace!" Art Blakey, of Cleveland, held a sign that read, "Indict, Convict, Send Killer Cops to Jail!" He said he wasn't surprised by the grand jury decision.

"There never has been any justice in these police murders," he said. "We're supposed to swallow these things whole as if this is business as usual."
___

Associated Press reporters Mitch Stacy, Kantele Franko and Julie Carr Smyth in Columbus and Dan Sewell in Cincinnati contributed to this story.

aplogo.jpg
-- (c) Associated Press 2015-12-29

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would call pulling a gun out of your waistband when confronted by police as provocative and likely to get you killed, regardless of the colour of the gunman or police at the time. If less black young men carried guns (real or not) then less would be shot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why the headline '' White '' and not ''Police ''

Because it's 'white' police officers in US who often shoot blacks with little to no provocation.

For sure, I have seen videos that clearly look like 1. a man was choked to death and 2. a man was shot in the back.

I would call pulling a gun out of your waistband when confronted by police as provocative and likely to get you killed, regardless of the colour of the gunman or police at the time. If less black young men carried guns (real or not) then less would be shot.

So this is where it all heads toward- a state where the lawless create the environment of victimization by law enforcers who generally wish to preserve the peace and return home safely.

America has inner cities which are vastly more dangerous then Baghdad, Saana, Irbil, or NWFP. In those places you might go on molested as the initial shock might be enough for others to freeze while you pass unharmed at least once. Not so in numerous American cities. As a white man/woman you would be preyed upon in packs ASAP! Even as a young black person you run great risk, but being white? Being white will get you beat, robbed, killed ASAP in America's numerous... numerous NO GO areas!

Why do police more likely shoot black men? Because black me are more likely to shoot police, others, each other, etc. There is no mystery here. America has sub cultures that are a law and life unto themselves and only exist in relation to the larger world when cashing checks, visiting ERs, police stations, jails, or such municipal services. Police have to patrol these sh>>tholes day and night fearing for their lives. I detest police brutality because I fear the nationalization of domestic law enforcement (and I clearly see valid issues of police brutality- too much), but this is not the core development. The primary issue is the demonization of legitimate LEOs and the victimization of antisocial conduct. Turning the worst behaviors among us into beyond reproach and penalizing all LEOs results in one more protected terrorist aspect of society- those who have hurting others as a daily tool of life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was a good decision by the grand jury not to indict officer Lehmannn in shooting Tamir. The video of the incident clearly shows Tamir pulling what looked like a real gun from his waistband. What was this kid thinking. Life is tough but it is even tougher when you are stupid.

This incident had nothing to do with race. If the police officer had been black and the kid white, it would have never been news worthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.









×
×
  • Create New...