EC to allow constitutional debate in main provinces

[webfact]

EC to allow constitutional debate in main provinces

BANGKOK, 26 July 2016 (NNT) – The Election Commission will be allocating a budget to organize debates in each main provinces before 3 August 2016, says an election commissioner.

Election Commissioner Somchai Srisuttiyakorn has revealed that the EC agrees with the government's proposal to hold a constitutional debate at key provinces, and will be allocating 150,000 baht to each province that are designated to hold debates.

The debate will be held under the regulations that each province can only hold the debate once, and all debates must be concluded no later than 3 August 2016.

Two supporting speakers will be present at each debate venue, which could be either a National Legislative Member or a constitutional promotion volunteer, and while two opposing speakers can be representatives from NGOs or university lecturers.

The money funding these debates are the remaining money from the ballot printing process.


-- NNT 2016-07-26

[Thechook]

Are these southern or northern provinces

[Rorri]

How long before they renege

[NongKhaiKid]

Are these southern or northern provinces

The ' safest ' ones and I mean in the respect of what might be said.

[bkkcanuck8]

The largest populated provinces outside central Bangkok and Chonburi areas are in the North and North East. So if you talk about main provinces you are at least talking of places like Chiang Mai and Korat and maybe Khon Kaen (Khon Kaen if more than 5 debates are held) as well as Bangkok and Hat Yai.

It will be worth watching if they try to redefine main provinces to something other than something like that.

[The stuttering parrot]

How many announcements on the allowing the debate do they need in one day?

Yet anyone who dares speak out against the referendum is threatened with 10 years jail.

[assayer]

Funding allocated for all provinces to stage debates on draft charter

EC to allow constitutional debate in main provinces

Two article headlines on TV.

So which is it (all or main) provinces

[BigBadGeordie]

Funding allocated for all provinces to stage debates on draft charter

EC to allow constitutional debate in main provinces

Two article headlines on TV.

So which is it (all or main) provinces

Yes, that's correct or perhaps "non of the above".

[bkkcanuck8]

Funding allocated for all provinces to stage debates on draft charter

EC to allow constitutional debate in main provinces

Two article headlines on TV.

So which is it (all or main) provinces

Yes, that's correct or perhaps "non of the above".

Since they will not be allowed to debate openly and honesty - they won't really be debates regardless of where they are.

[maoro2013]

Hooray. Some provinces get a debate.

8 days to go. Can I see it happening!!

Not much time to organise this or get the 'against' team organised.

The whole thing is a total farce.

I still don't know anybody who has seen the draft charter, and also I don't know, after a recent post, describing the people entitled to vote, who is able to vote.

[waldroj]

"...each province can only hold the debate once, and all debates must be concluded no later than 3 August 2016..."

Instead of fragmenting the points of view (which is something the junta does so well), why not just allocate the entire pool of money to one big national debate where (through the wonders of modern television), everyone can text, sms, or twitter in their questions from the safety of their own homes?

A sort of mass debate if you will - then everyone gets a happy ending!

Edited July 26, 2016 by waldroj

[WhizBang]

I assume any 'opposing speakers' must be first approved by the junta. No?

What do they mean by 'can only hold the debate once'?

If this isn't rigged, I don't know what is.

[phycokiller]

its all a charade anyway, nothing will change until the change comes, and when that happens all this will probably go out the window. they are just going through the process to fill in time while they wait