rooster59 Posted February 3, 2017 Share Posted February 3, 2017 Tests find no paint repair to Jomsap truck By PIYANUCH TAMNUKASETCHAI THE NATION NO EVIDENCE of paint repair or a new coat of paint has been found on the Toyota pickup truck belonging to former teacher Jomsap Saenmuangkhot who was accused of being the driver in a 2005 fatal hit-and-run accident. The pickup was inspected by Toyota Motor Co Ltd’s Samut Prakan-based factory, a source at the Justice Ministry revealed yesterday. In addition, the truck’s “Bor Khor 56 Sakhon Nakhon” licence plate was found to have no scratches or traces of being repaired after an inspection by King Mongkut University of Technology Thonburi. Full story: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/news/national/30305636 -- © Copyright The Nation 2017-02-04 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reigntax Posted February 4, 2017 Share Posted February 4, 2017 Time for the RTP to make up the next fairy tale. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
z42 Posted February 4, 2017 Share Posted February 4, 2017 Excellent. The RTP's farcical attempts at a cover up are unravelling. When will the defamation suits and intimidation be brought into play / ramped up I wonder..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waldroj Posted February 4, 2017 Share Posted February 4, 2017 "...no scratches or traces of being repaired..." No "deformation", hmm...likely no "defamation" either !!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thai3 Posted February 4, 2017 Share Posted February 4, 2017 Can the RTP take legal action against the truck for something? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meatboy Posted February 4, 2017 Share Posted February 4, 2017 and the real culprit has already sorted it out,with a BIG brown ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reigntax Posted February 4, 2017 Share Posted February 4, 2017 1 hour ago, thai3 said: Can the RTP take legal action against the truck for something? Yes, for not having repaired dings and paint thereby the truck has tarnished the good name of the RTP by exposing their comical and deliberate errors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ratcatcher Posted February 4, 2017 Share Posted February 4, 2017 1 hour ago, thai3 said: Can the RTP take legal action against the truck for something? Yes, they should charge the owner with not restoring and repainting a Toyota truck with rust on the bonnet/hood. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xerostar Posted February 4, 2017 Share Posted February 4, 2017 Is it the same truck, or one that looks like the original repaired one ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sweatalot Posted February 4, 2017 Share Posted February 4, 2017 1 hour ago, Reigntax said: Yes, for not having repaired dings and paint thereby the truck has tarnished the good name of the RTP by exposing their comical and deliberate errors. comical ...error? it looks like utterly malign criminal action Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaltsc Posted February 4, 2017 Share Posted February 4, 2017 "...police have stood by the original evidence. " One definition of "original": " "Created directly and personally". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowgard Posted February 4, 2017 Share Posted February 4, 2017 So she was convicted without ANY evidence??? This make me speakless!!! What her lawyer done before? No one checked that the car was involved in a accident? Did the police rubb a glasbowl and saw she was it? Unbelievable!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Khun Paul Posted February 4, 2017 Share Posted February 4, 2017 (edited) This is about a Thai wrongly imprisoned for an offence that she obviously never committed, reminds me of a case involving two Burmese men, if the RTP can get away with it they will, this one involving a Thai national will possibly be the straw that breaks the cocoon of untouchability the RTP have tried to protect , if it breaks it will be showinq the world that the RTP is the most corrupt Govt agency in this country plus they are inept as well. I would add NOT ALL RTP officers are corrupt, but questions and accountability needs to be transparent and true justice served. Edited February 4, 2017 by Khun Paul adding a sentence Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kartman Posted February 4, 2017 Share Posted February 4, 2017 Just on the posted picture nothing to do with the case why has it got a large lump of filler out of the top front of the repainted front N/S wing/fender along with a suspiciously newer than the other light headlamp either poor facts relaid to the press or Toyota cant assess old cars Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtls2005 Posted February 4, 2017 Share Posted February 4, 2017 Twelve years later; no chain of custody issues on the "evidence"? That said, seems like the police would have been smart to "Kho Tao" the truck up BEFORE Toyota and the King Mongkut Institute "inspections"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sweatalot Posted February 4, 2017 Share Posted February 4, 2017 1 hour ago, mtls2005 said: Twelve years later; no chain of custody issues on the "evidence"? That said, seems like the police would have been smart to "Kho Tao" the truck up BEFORE Toyota and the King Mongkut Institute "inspections"? fortunateley they are not smart, instead they are (deleted) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elgordo38 Posted February 4, 2017 Share Posted February 4, 2017 7 hours ago, thai3 said: Can the RTP take legal action against the truck for something? Would not surprise me if they tried. Back to watching Looney Tunes on TV no not the television. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldgent Posted February 4, 2017 Share Posted February 4, 2017 don,t see a number plate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enoon Posted February 4, 2017 Share Posted February 4, 2017 7 hours ago, kartman said: Just on the posted picture nothing to do with the case why has it got a large lump of filler out of the top front of the repainted front N/S wing/fender along with a suspiciously newer than the other light headlamp either poor facts relaid to the press or Toyota cant assess old cars Guess: They only tested the alleged area of impact (front centre of hood/bonnet). Number plate tested as impact was centre front. Damage to wing/headlamp was another incident? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enoon Posted February 4, 2017 Share Posted February 4, 2017 2 hours ago, oldgent said: don,t see a number plate The licence plate was removed for testing: "In addition, the truck’s “Bor Khor 56 Sakhon Nakhon” licence plate was found to have no scratches or traces of being repaired after an inspection by King Mongkut University of Technology Thonburi." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now