19 hours ago, Andaman Al said:

What are Trump supporters when they support a man who is in collaboration with the Russians

The only place this collaboration seems to be taking place is in your mind. Please share proof of this cooperative event that has taken place.

 

Ps. Mods, if the quoted comment and my query Re deemed  too far off topic and you ... well, you know

Edited March 20, 20179 yr by Ramen087

13 hours ago, Ramen087 said:

 

The only place this collaboration seems to be taking place is in your mind. Please share proof of this cooperative event that has taken place.

 

Ps. Mods, if the quoted comment and my query Re deemed  too far off topic and you ... well, you know

Wasn't it Hillary Clinton, as Secretary of State, who approved the sale of 20% of the US uranium production to the Russians?  

Trump fires the best people, and hires the worst.  I'm trying to think of one good quality possessed by Trump.  He doesn't drink alcohol?   Well, maybe, but he does peddle the stuff.

17 minutes ago, landslide said:

Wasn't it Hillary Clinton, as Secretary of State, who approved the sale of 20% of the US uranium production to the Russians?  

No it was not.

http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/

 

http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/article/2017/feb/16/donald-trump-repeats-his-mostly-false-claim-about-/

 

http://www.factcheck.org/2017/02/factchecking-trumps-news-conference/

12 minutes ago, ilostmypassword said:

No it was not.

http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/

 

http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/article/2017/feb/16/donald-trump-repeats-his-mostly-false-claim-about-/

 

http://www.factcheck.org/2017/02/factchecking-trumps-news-conference/

And then again, from the NY Times:

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0

28 minutes ago, landslide said:

And then again, from the NY Times:

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0

smoking gun not. not even close. Clinton was only one of nine people to approve and ultimately the power rested with the president who actually is the only person who could nix the deal.

9 hours ago, ilostmypassword said:

smoking gun not. not even close. Clinton was only one of nine people to approve and ultimately the power rested with the president who actually is the only person who could nix the deal.

Agreed.  But it does look dodgy with those big contributions.  That NY Times article is an interesting read.  But like Snopes said, no evidence HRC did anything out of the ordinary with regards to the deal.  Still, potentially dodgy.

2 hours ago, craigt3365 said:

Agreed.  But it does look dodgy with those big contributions.  That NY Times article is an interesting read.  But like Snopes said, no evidence HRC did anything out of the ordinary with regards to the deal.  Still, potentially dodgy.

Exactly.  No smoking gun.  Works well in the courts.  But outside the courts system, there's enough there to sway opinion.  Happens to politicians all the time.