gazza4 Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 23 hours ago, janclaes47 said: Any chance that this concerns a politician who's son apologized today to the PM, and that this was actually the reason he went over the top on FB? Remember that a few years ago a politician from a major party had a Bentley for which he couldn't show an invoice, because it belonged to a Singaporean friend. My apologies to you, janclaes47, that I have only just read your intuitive comment. Thank you for your wisdom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomwct Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 If he bought it at a very low price he's guilty of theft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robblok Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 8 minutes ago, tomwct said: If he bought it at a very low price he's guilty of theft. That is for sure.. or at least he should have known something was wrong it would make him guilty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metisdead Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 Off topic posts and replies have been removed. This is not about the Dutch laws regarding stolen vehicles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moonmoon Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 He insisted that since he bought the car legally, he should be regarded as a damaged person and allowed to keep it, the source said. I understand the he suffered losses too, but what about the original owner? The car should be returned to the original owner and the losses of the politician should be claim against the car dealer or person who sold him the car. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YetAnother Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 whoa whoa ; now THREATENING to sue is somehow both newsworthy and perhaps even effective (?!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YetAnother Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 place is and has been run by 10 year olds Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wakeupplease Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 10 minutes ago, YetAnother said: place is and has been run by 10 year olds No a bit older than that but with a 10 year old education Biggest scam that has been going on here for years is the Nissan GTR nicked in Japan and imported here, a lot bigger than the UK scam Making a lot of money for some even with the lid being lifted on the UK scam If the BIB start looking at the Nissen GTR + import rip off from Japan, standby for some big names who will get very very upset Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Na Lee Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 Do YOU know who I am...!!! This car belongs to me though it's stolen it is MINE MINE MINE. DON't dare to confiscate my stolen car. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Na Lee Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 Thainess at it's best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Na Lee Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 What the BIB should do is mold the car a block of 50x50x50 cm. and drop that back in his/her driveway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keesters Posted June 3, 2017 Share Posted June 3, 2017 Anybody know what he paid for the car and what would be a 100% legal version of the car's street value. If the figures don't come close then I'd say he knew it was stolen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
halloween Posted June 3, 2017 Share Posted June 3, 2017 1 hour ago, Keesters said: Anybody know what he paid for the car and what would be a 100% legal version of the car's street value. If the figures don't come close then I'd say he knew it was stolen. Not necessarily. He may have thought it was one brought in as parts, which would make him guilty but of a different crime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keesters Posted June 3, 2017 Share Posted June 3, 2017 19 hours ago, halloween said: Not necessarily. He may have thought it was one brought in as parts, which would make him guilty but of a different crime. So a case of "same same but different". Whatever. If the cost to him did not come close to street value then he should have known that something was fishy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
off road pat Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 On 6/2/2017 at 10:21 AM, off road pat said: Oh my G,....this is very sharp. my compliments, I would never have thought of this !!! Apparently it's not this guy but another one from Isaan. according to my wife who follows those cases closely !!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
.thumb.jpg.bc523c85a8d558dbc282dca7a2e602c9.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now