23 hours ago, janclaes47 said:

 

 

 

 

Any chance that this concerns a politician who's son apologized today to the PM, and that this was actually the reason he went over the top on FB? Remember that a few years ago a politician from a major party had a Bentley for which he couldn't show an invoice, because it belonged to a Singaporean friend.

 

 

 

 

My apologies to you, janclaes47, that I have only just read your intuitive comment. Thank you for your wisdom 

If he bought it at a very low price he's guilty of theft.

8 minutes ago, tomwct said:

If he bought it at a very low price he's guilty of theft.

That is for sure.. or at least he should have known something was wrong it would make him guilty.

Off topic posts and replies have been removed.  This is not about the Dutch laws regarding stolen vehicles. 

He insisted that since he bought the car legally, he should be regarded as a damaged person and allowed to keep it, the source said. 

 

I understand the he suffered losses too, but what about the original owner? 

The car should be returned to the original owner and the losses of the politician should be claim against the car dealer or person who sold him the car. 

whoa whoa ; now THREATENING to sue is somehow both newsworthy and perhaps even effective (?!)

place is and has been run by 10 year olds 

10 minutes ago, YetAnother said:

place is and has been run by 10 year olds 

No a bit older than that but with a 10 year old education

 

Biggest scam that has been going on here for years is the Nissan GTR nicked in Japan and imported here, a lot bigger than the UK scam

Making a lot of money for some even with the lid being lifted on the UK scam

 

If the BIB start looking at the Nissen GTR + import rip off from Japan, standby for some big names who will get very very upset

Do YOU know who I am...!!! This car belongs to me though it's stolen it is MINE MINE MINE. DON't dare to confiscate my stolen car.

Thainess at it's best.

What the BIB should do is mold the car a block of 50x50x50 cm. and drop that back in his/her driveway.

Anybody know what he paid for the car and what would be a 100% legal version of the car's street value. If the figures don't come close then I'd say he knew it was stolen.

 

 

 

 

 

 

1 hour ago, Keesters said:

Anybody know what he paid for the car and what would be a 100% legal version of the car's street value. If the figures don't come close then I'd say he knew it was stolen.

 

Not necessarily. He may have thought it was one brought in as parts, which would make him guilty but of a different crime.

19 hours ago, halloween said:

Not necessarily. He may have thought it was one brought in as parts, which would make him guilty but of a different crime.

 

So a case of "same same but different". Whatever. If the cost to him did not come close to street value then he should have known that something was fishy.

 

 

On 6/2/2017 at 10:21 AM, off road pat said:

Oh my G,....this is very sharp. my compliments, I would never have thought of this !!!

Apparently it's not this guy but another one from Isaan. according to my wife who follows those cases closely !!!