Trump, Putin held a second, undisclosed meeting at G20 summit

[Thakkar]

13 minutes ago, iReason said:

38 minutes ago, Thakkar said:

"both sides of the aisle want to destroy him"

 

Actually, one side wants to get to the bottom of why so many Trump associates met with so many shady Russians, did not disclose the meetings as required, then denied those meetings, then lied about those meetings, then lied about the reasons for those meetings.

 

The other side wants to ignore that whole unsavory thing, wish we would all ignore it so they spcan get on with major tax cuts and regulatory crippling in service to their major donors.

 

Must you continue being so logical and rational?

You just might explode some heads.

 

 

I apologize if I make any heads explode.

But I suspect a lot of those skulls are thick enough to withstand any any logic penetration, so I think they're safe.

 

T

[mrwebb8825]

On 7/23/2017 at 9:33 AM, craigt3365 said:

It's absolutely OK for the president to speak with Putin.  Many presidents before him have done this.  But none had so many allegations against them with regards to Russian connections.  And none lied as much as Trump. 

 

He should have had another person in the room to help document the proceedings.  It would have been easy to do.  Yet, he met alone.  Hmmmm.....

So, he met alone in a room filled with no less than 50 people? Were they also speaking under a "Cone Of Silence" so that none of the people sitting next to or across from them could hear? Or MAYBE, they were the only 2 people in the room filled with top 20 leaders that could speak and understand English?

[craigt3365]

18 minutes ago, mrwebb8825 said:

So, he met alone in a room filled with no less than 50 people? Were they also speaking under a "Cone Of Silence" so that none of the people sitting next to or across from them could hear? Or MAYBE, they were the only 2 people in the room filled with top 20 leaders that could speak and understand English?

Please do some research on this.  He was ALONE in the room with Putin and his translator!  It was a separate meeting he didn't disclose until reported by the media.  No wonder Trump hates the press! LOL

[mrwebb8825]

23 minutes ago, craigt3365 said:

Please do some research on this.  He was ALONE in the room with Putin and his translator!  It was a separate meeting he didn't disclose until reported by the media.  No wonder Trump hates the press! LOL

you may want to do the research: "The New York Times confirmed the second meeting, which has no official United States record, took place at a couples-only dinner at the Summit."

[craigt3365]

4 hours ago, mrwebb8825 said:

you may want to do the research: "The New York Times confirmed the second meeting, which has no official United States record, took place at a couples-only dinner at the Summit."

Maybe this will help you:

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/07/18/politics/trump-putin-g20/index.html

 

Quote

 

Trump, Putin met for nearly an hour in second G20 meeting

'Only the Russians will have a transcript'

US presidents at summits often hold private and impromptu discussions with other world leaders. However, the lack of immediate disclosure from the administration as well as Trump's own posture with regard to Russia raised significant questions following reports of the discussion having taken place.

 

It was a private meeting.  Nobody else heard them, and no US officials were there.

 

From that link:

Quote

"While smaller pull-aside meetings are common, it is strange that a pull-aside with someone like Putin -- especially Putin -- would not include at least another national security official and a translator," Kirby said.

 

 

 

[mrwebb8825]

On 7/24/2017 at 5:39 PM, craigt3365 said:

Maybe this will help you:

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/07/18/politics/trump-putin-g20/index.html

 

It was a private meeting.  Nobody else heard them, and no US officials were there.

 

From that link:

 

 

 

the only thing needed to be said to debunk your source is CNN.

[craigt3365]

19 minutes ago, mrwebb8825 said:

the only thing needed to be said to debunk your source is CNN.

No worries!  Same thing is reported by every other media site.  Well, credible ones anyway. LOL

 

Nothing wrong with CNN.  They are a good source of news.  I ignore the opinion pieces or take them for what they are.  News is news.  Facts are facts.  Unless you are trump and call facts fake news!!! LOL