Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

ASEAN NOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

Farage Quits MP Role to Force Clacton By-Election

Nigel Farage has announced he will resign as MP for Clacton and contest the resulting by-election, saying voters should decide his future as he faces mounting scrutiny over financial support he has received.

Get today's headlines by email image.png

The Reform UK leader said the "people of Clacton should be the judges of my actions" and insisted he had done nothing wrong.

His decision comes while he is under investigation by Parliament's standards commissioner over a £5 million gift received before he entered Parliament. Opposition parties have also called for further scrutiny after reports that he failed to declare additional support allegedly provided by another political ally.

Farage seeks fresh mandate amid scrutiny

Farage accused the parliamentary standards process of being used as a political weapon and said he wanted to be judged by voters rather than the media. In a video statement released by Reform UK, he said the by-election would allow constituents to "stick two fingers up at the entire establishment".

Major parties refuse to contest vote

Labour, the Conservatives, the Liberal Democrats and Restore Britain have all said they will not field candidates in the by-election, effectively boycotting the contest.

A Labour spokesperson said the party would not "indulge" Farage by taking part in what it described as "this circus".

Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch dismissed the move as a "gimmick", arguing Farage was attempting to distract attention from the allegations surrounding his finances. She said the Conservatives would instead contest any "real by-election" that might result from the standards investigation.

Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey urged the government to delay Farage's resignation until the standards commissioner completed the investigation. He added that if the by-election proceeds, other parties should continue refusing to participate in what he described as Farage's "vanity project".

Restore Britain leader Rupert Lowe also ruled out standing a candidate, although he said his party would contest any future by-election triggered by the outcome of the standards investigation. The Green Party said the decision on whether to stand would be made by its local Clacton branch.

Investigations and financial support

Farage's resignation will suspend the standards commissioner's investigation into the £5 million gift until he returns to Parliament, should he win the by-election.

The inquiry began in May after questions were raised over his failure to declare the donation from Christopher Harborne, a Thailand-based British cryptocurrency investor and one of Reform UK's largest financial backers. Harborne has donated £15 million to the party since the beginning of last year.

Farage has said the £5 million was an unconditional gift intended to help fund his personal security.

His team has also argued that non-cash support reportedly provided by longtime associate George Cottrell, including funding staff for security and social media work and access to accommodation near Buckingham Palace, did not require registration.

The allegations emerged after a Sunday Times report examined Farage's links to Cottrell, who served eight months in a US prison after pleading guilty to wire fraud in 2017.

Farage said he had spent the weekend considering his future after media coverage involving his family and Cottrell.

Rules and next steps

Parliament requires newly elected MPs to declare gifts or benefits connected with their parliamentary or political activities that were received in the 12 months before their election, although purely personal gifts are exempt.

Farage insisted he had complied with the law.

"Let me be absolutely clear: I have done nothing wrong. I have not broken the law in any way at all. I have not misused public money," he said.

If the standards investigation eventually concludes that Farage should be suspended, a recall petition could be triggered. If at least 10% of eligible voters sign the petition, another by-election would be held.

Farage won the Clacton seat at the 2024 general election with a majority of 8,405 over the Conservatives after seven previous unsuccessful attempts to enter Parliament.

His resignation will take effect only after he accepts a Crown appointment, the formal mechanism used to disqualify MPs from the House of Commons.

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png

Already a member? haveyr-say.png


image.png
Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 8 July 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member
10 minutes ago, RayC said:

I didn't claim that, 'Everyday is like Sunday' is about Clacton, I said that Clacton was best described by the line, 'This is a coastal town that forgot to close down'.

No, you said Morrisey best described Clacton. He didn't. He wasn't describing Clacton at all. That's your inference.

It's like you saying "This is the fascist tyrant who just won't go away" without stating who you are referring to and then me saying RayC best described Starmer as a fascist tyrant who won't go away. 😄

10 minutes ago, RayC said:

The Smiths were a cracking band. Shame that Morrissey has gone mad.

Yeah The Smiths were awesome. Morrissey hasn't gone mad at all. He's perfectly normal. It's the leftist extremists who think his normal views are mad that have gone doolally. He's based. And a lyrical genius. You could learn a lot from him.

I've been dreaming of a time when
To be English is not to be baneful
To be standing by the flag not feeling shameful
Racist or partial

10 minutes ago, RayC said:

Still on your ageist kick I see. I suppose that it makes a change from racism and xenophobia.

It's true I'm guilty of some light hearted teasing about your advancing years Raymondo. However, I've challenged you to find a racist post by me many times and you never can. Or maybe you simply forget the request as soon as you've read it, same as you "forget" calling for a second Brexit vote? Old age can do that. 😄

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member
24 minutes ago, RayC said:

For once, I hope that I am wrong and you are right.

Beaten by a bin. Couldn't be more apt.

It would certainly show the pathetic state of UK politics.

Is that what you want?

RayC Ruby Member

RayC

Advanced Member
1 minute ago, JonnyF said:

It would certainly show the pathetic state of UK politics.

Is that what you want?

No. It might show that the English public reject the divisive politics of Reform

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member
4 minutes ago, RayC said:

No. It might show that the English public reject the divisive politics of Reform

It would result in Count Binface being a Member of Parliament.

A complete failure of British politics laid bare for the world to point and laugh.

The mother of all Parliaments... 😄

scubascuba3 Star Member

scubascuba3

Advanced Member
31 minutes ago, RayC said:

No. It might show that the English public reject the divisive politics of Reform

It won't show that, only that the lefties have combined. Farage and Reform are best for UK, get rid of the lefties and tackle the big issues Labour only make worse

RayC Ruby Member

RayC

Advanced Member
5 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

No, you said Morrisey best described Clacton. He didn't. He wasn't describing Clacton at all. That's your inference.

It's like you saying "This is the fascist tyrant who just won't go away" without stating who you are referring to and then me saying RayC best described Starmer as a fascist tyrant who won't go away. 😄

No it's YOUR inference, Jonny, although I'll admit that I could have been more precise and less ambiguous.

In any event, your objection is pedantic.

5 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Yeah The Smiths were awesome. Morrissey hasn't gone mad at all. He's perfectly normal. It's the leftist extremists who think his normal views are mad that have gone doolally. He's based. And a lyrical genius. You could learn a lot from him.

I've been dreaming of a time when
To be English is not to be baneful
To be standing by the flag not feeling shameful
Racist or partial

Morrissey's views have changed and his Smiths personna is nothing like the one that he exhibits today.

A fine lyric. "Irish blood, English Heart". Could substitute, 'African', 'Indian', etc for 'Irish'. What's your point?

5 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

It's true I'm guilty of some light hearted teasing about your advancing years Raymondo. However, I've challenged you to find a racist post by me many times and you never can. Or maybe you simply forget the request as soon as you've read it, same as you "forget" calling for a second Brexit vote? Old age can do that. 😄

How about the post below. I'll preempt your argument about ethnicity by pointing out that the number of 'pure breed' indigenous English living today is Infinitesimal.

So what is an Englishman? Essentially a nationality because English ethnicity is extinct. 21st century Englishmen are mongrels. We all have - to varying degrees - bits of ancient English tribe, Celt, Anglo-Saxon, Roman, Norman, African, Indian, you name it, in our DNA.

But these facts, especially the non-white parts, don't sit well with you do they, Jonny?

Now that I've supplied an example of your racism, maybe you could supply a post where I called for a second ('Peoples vote') Brexit referendum?

About time you put up or shut up i.e. stopped lying.

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member
16 hours ago, RayC said:

So what is an Englishman? Essentially a nationality because English ethnicity is extinct. 21st century Englishmen are mongrels.

Your attempts at ethnocide are well noted.

You'll be telling us there is no such thing as English culture and England was built by immigrants next. 😄

Ethnic deconstruction in full effect by Raymond. Why am I not surprised. 😄

Straight out of the leftist playbook.

image.png

scubascuba3 Star Member

scubascuba3

Advanced Member
11 minutes ago, RayC said:

Who do you think helped built England and shape English culture apart from immigrants? Romans, Vikings, Normans, etc were not indigenous to England. They were immigrants (invaders).

Culture is dynamic. Why don't you think that latter-day immigrants such as Bengalis, Africans, etc. cannot/ should not help to shape Englishness and English culture nowadays? Rhetorical question, Jonathan. We both know the answer. Because their skin pigmentation is the 'wrong'.

You won't admit it, you might even genuinely believe that you're not, but many of your views are racist and that makes you one. Own the label or change your views.

Old boring argument, the point is now there is too much migration, public services can't cope, welfare through the roof, plus the security risk with the boat people l, wake up

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member
27 minutes ago, RayC said:

Who do you think helped built England and shape English culture apart from immigrants? Romans, Vikings, Normans, etc were not indigenous to England. They were immigrants (invaders).

Culture is dynamic. Why don't you think that latter-day immigrants such as Bengalis, Africans, etc. cannot/ should not help to shape Englishness and English culture nowadays? Rhetorical question, Jonathan. We both know the answer. Because their skin pigmentation is the 'wrong'.

You won't admit it, you might even genuinely believe that you're not, but many of your views are racist and that makes you one. Own the label or change your views.

You cannot rewrite history Raymond. You cannot change social anthropology.

image.png

RayC Ruby Member

RayC

Advanced Member
9 minutes ago, scubascuba3 said:

Old boring argument, the point is now there is too much migration, public services can't cope, welfare through the roof, plus the security risk with the boat people l, wake up

So point out the flaws in my argument.

Yes, there should be a discussion about the levels and effects of immigration - including its' effect on the host's culture - and to do so doesn't infer racism, but to simply reject immigration because of the migrant's skin colour, as some do, does imply it.

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member
6 minutes ago, RayC said:

So point out the flaws in my argument.

Yes, there should be a discussion about the levels and effects of immigration - including its' effect on the host's culture - and to do so doesn't infer racism, but to simply reject immigration because of the migrant's skin colour, as some do, does imply it.

And once again Raymond's insatiable demand for racism is outstripping the supply. 😄

Nobody is saying that white illegal immigrants are welcome but black ones are not. If they are, prove it. Quote them - or stop making things up.

The only people saying race should dictate the way people are treated and the opportunities they receive are the DEI crew, which includes YOU.

RayC Ruby Member

RayC

Advanced Member
6 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

You cannot rewrite history Raymond. You cannot change social anthropology.

image.png

Oh dear. To quote the opening line from one of the Black English band, Steel Pulse's, songs: " Woe, desperation has returned to here now".

By that definition, those of Norman, Roman, Viking, etc ancestry are not English.

RayC Ruby Member

RayC

Advanced Member

How on earth you can conclude this:

5 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

And once again Raymond's insatiable demand for racism is outstripping the supply. 😄

Nobody is saying that white illegal immigrants are welcome but black ones are not. If they are, prove it. Quote them - or stop making things up.

The only people saying race should dictate the way people are treated and the opportunities they receive are the DEI crew, which includes YOU.

from this:

"Yes, there should be a discussion about the levels and effects of immigration - including its' effect on the host's culture - and to do so doesn't infer racism, but to simply reject immigration because of the migrant's skin colour, as some do, does imply it."

only you know.

In your futile attempts to justify racism, you disown any sense of rationality.

You're losing it, John Boy, in more ways than one. My advice is to give it a rest and, when you are in a more rational state of mind, reflect on what you are saying.

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member
10 minutes ago, RayC said:

Oh dear. To quote the opening line from one of the Black English band, Steel Pulse's, songs: " Woe, desperation has returned to here now".

By that definition, those of Norman, Roman, Viking, etc ancestry are not English.

No desperation Raymond. Just cold hard facts which you cannot accept.

Vikings are norse people from Scandanavia. Romans are from Rome. So correct, they are not English either. Neither are the Chinese.

If I move to Japan and wear a Kimono, I won't be Japanese.

It's really not that complicated (until you try to justify your rewriting of history and ethnic deconstruction).

RayC Ruby Member

RayC

Advanced Member
1 minute ago, JonnyF said:

No desperation Raymond. Just cold hard facts which you cannot accept.

Vikings are norse people from Scandanavia. Romans are from Rome. So correct, they are not English either. Neither are the Chinese.

If I move to Japan and wear a Kimono, I won't be Japanese.

It's really not that complicated (until you try to justify your rewriting of history and ethnic deconstruction).

Which word would you prefer me to use instead of 'desperation', Jonathan? Hopelessness? Just let me know and I'll be happy to oblige.

"Vikings are norse people from Scandanavia. Romans are from Rome. So correct, they are not English either". So are those who are descended from these groups (let's add the Normans from Normandy as well), 'English'? If not, I'd hazard a guess that there are very few Englishmen in England.

I agree: It's not difficult but then again, I'm not trying to justify a racist position. Now that is difficult.

scubascuba3 Star Member

scubascuba3

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, RayC said:

but to simply reject immigration because of the migrant's skin colour, as some do, does imply it.

Who's doing that? that's not Reform, i doubt even Restore do that, but the lefties like to say that's what those on the right say. Are you a public sector worker?

RayC Ruby Member

RayC

Advanced Member
28 minutes ago, scubascuba3 said:

Who's doing that? that's not Reform, i doubt even Restore do that, but the lefties like to say that's what those on the right say. Are you a public sector worker?

What on earth are you on about? Where did I say anything about Reform/ Restore " ... simply reject(ing) immigration because of the migrant's skin colour, as some do ...". (The 'some do' refers to some posters on this forum).

Seems to be a trait among some on the right; 'misinterpret' something, jump to a false conclusion and then make an irrational generalisation about 'lefties'.

I worked (briefly) as a Civil Servant in the early '80s. Thereafter I worked as a contractor and ended up jointly running a small consultancy before retiring. You tell me what relevance this has?

scubascuba3 Star Member

scubascuba3

Advanced Member
(edited)
12 hours ago, RayC said:

What on earth are you on about? Where did I say anything about Reform/ Restore " ... simply reject(ing) immigration because of the migrant's skin colour, as some do ...". (The 'some do' refers to some posters on this forum).

Seems to be a trait among some on the right; 'misinterpret' something, jump to a false conclusion and then make an irrational generalisation about 'lefties'.

I worked (briefly) as a Civil Servant in the early '80s. Thereafter I worked as a contractor and ended up jointly running a small consultancy before retiring. You tell me what relevance this has?

People who work public sector are part of the problem, they are on the gravy train, nothing works properly in the public sector, to me they are as bad as the spongers

Edited by scubascuba3

RayC Ruby Member

RayC

Advanced Member
9 hours ago, scubascuba3 said:

People who work public sector are part of the problem, they are on the gravy train, nothing works properly in the public sector, to me they are as bad as the spongers

Right. Let's get rid of health care workers, the police, firemen, the armed forces, etc.

BritManToo Star Member

BritManToo

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, RayC said:

Right. Let's get rid of health care workers, the police, firemen, the armed forces, etc.

In the UK,

The police are the agents of tyranny (socialist enforcers)

The armed forces are agents of oppression (invade foreign countries)

I agree, we should get rid of both!

RayC Ruby Member

RayC

Advanced Member
On 7/10/2026 at 2:52 PM, JonnyF said:

You're the biggest racist on here.

But you hate white people so you think it doesn't count.

You support racism against white people under the guise of DEI. You support discrimination against them.

You are a horribe racist Raymond.

Own it.

I'm white, Jonathan, so why on earth would I support those who would discriminate against me simply because of the colour of my skin? I'm not as irrational as you.

Let's recap: You quote the following definition of English ethnicity,

17838023111858319442279000670487.jpg

in order to support your claim that there cannot be Black Englishmen. When I point out that by this definition Vikings, Romans, Normans, etc and their descendants cannot, therefore, be considered 'Englishmen' you have no counter argument for the simply reason that you are left with two choices, 1) redefining 'English' or 2) admitting that you are wrong. The problem for you is that either option opens the door to allowing the possibility of a Black Englishmen and that just wouldn't do, would it?

Your latest empty, tired and pathetic post coupled with your refusal to admit that your argument has no validity shows your racist position for what it is.

Chomper Higgot Star Member

Chomper Higgot

Advanced Member
On 7/10/2026 at 3:22 PM, JonnyF said:

You cannot rewrite history Raymond. You cannot change social anthropology.

image.png

Don’t be ludicrous man.

Social anthropology is the study of societies and culture, both of which always changed and always will.

Chomper Higgot Star Member

Chomper Higgot

Advanced Member

I doubt you’ll find a prouder Englishman today, or indeed an Englishman more celebrated by true English patriots:

IMG_2330.jpeg

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member
8 hours ago, RayC said:

I'm white, Jonathan, so why on earth would I support those who would discriminate against me simply because of the colour of my skin? I'm not as irrational as you.

White Liberal self loathing.

You think other white people are as weak and pathetic as you are, hence you generalise and extend your self hatred to the whole white race.

This isn't a new phenomenon. There's plenty of literature on it. I can recommend some if you like.

Any other questions?

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Don’t be ludicrous man.

Social anthropology is the study of societies and culture, both of which always changed and always will.

Wrong again Higgot.

Ethnically English people will always have the same heritage. Their ethic makeup shall remain the same.

You cannot rewrite history Higgot. Britain wasn't built by immigrants. We do have our own culture and its fantastic. Not all cultures are equal.

Your attempts at ethnic deconstruction will fail.

Chomper Higgot Star Member

Chomper Higgot

Advanced Member
(edited)
27 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Wrong again Higgot.

Ethnically English people will always have the same heritage. Their ethic makeup shall remain the same.

You cannot rewrite history Higgot. Britain wasn't built by immigrants. We do have our own culture and its fantastic. Not all cultures are equal.

Your attempts at ethnic deconstruction will fail.

No they won’t idiot.

There are marked genetic differences amongst the mongrel populations across the regions of England.

What’s this ‘First Class Honours Degree‘ of yours in? nothing that requires an ability to construct a rational fact based argument it would seem.

How about the non white Englishman saving England’s bacon with a goal against Norway in extra time?

A true Englishman hero being celebrated by true English patriots. A few racist will of course refuse to accept him as English, like all racists they are ignorant tossers all of them.

https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2015-03-19-who-do-you-think-you-really-are-genetic-map-british-isles

Edited by Chomper Higgot

RayC Ruby Member

RayC

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, JonnyF said:

White Liberal self loathing.

You think other white people are as weak and pathetic as you are, hence you generalise and extend your self hatred to the whole white race.

This isn't a new phenomenon. There's plenty of literature on it. I can recommend some if you like.

Any other questions?

Dear, oh dear. In your feeble attempt to justify your untenable position you now resort, once again, to out-and-out lying: Where have I " ... generalise(d) and extend(ed my) self hatred to the whole white race"? That's right, I haven't.

I don't loath myself, Jonny. In fact, I quite like myself, so maybe I am guilty of being a narcissist. But a self-loather and racist? No, not me.

Let's remind ourselves what this is all about. You stated that:

  • Most of the English (football) team are not English

  • Black people are not English.

I don't doubt that the overwhelming majority of people who read your posts reached the same conclusion as me long ago: You are a racist. The difference this time is that rather than hide behind snide, sarcky comments such as, "Diversity is our strength", and then plead innocence suggesting that this could not be possibly be interpreted as racist, this time you're let your guard down and made two explicitly racist statements.

And before you claim otherwise, it is difficult to think of a situation where the above bulletted sentences could be taken out of context: They are racist in nature which makes the person who made them a racist.

Own the label or disown the statements.

josephbloggs Diamond Member

josephbloggs

Advanced Member
On 7/10/2026 at 7:52 PM, JonnyF said:

You're the biggest racist on here.

But you hate white people so you think it doesn't count.

You support racism against white people under the guise of DEI. You support discrimination against them.

You are a horribe racist Raymond.

Own it.


Friday , 7th July, 2026. The day that Jonny finally, and officially, completely lost the plot.

Consumed with hatred, the rot has overtaken the brain completely, it is beyond ridiculous now, I think it must be a parody account and we've all been strung along.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.