Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

ASEAN NOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

Farage Quits MP Role to Force Clacton By-Election

Nigel Farage has announced he will resign as MP for Clacton and contest the resulting by-election, saying voters should decide his future as he faces mounting scrutiny over financial support he has received.

Get today's headlines by email image.png

The Reform UK leader said the "people of Clacton should be the judges of my actions" and insisted he had done nothing wrong.

His decision comes while he is under investigation by Parliament's standards commissioner over a £5 million gift received before he entered Parliament. Opposition parties have also called for further scrutiny after reports that he failed to declare additional support allegedly provided by another political ally.

Farage seeks fresh mandate amid scrutiny

Farage accused the parliamentary standards process of being used as a political weapon and said he wanted to be judged by voters rather than the media. In a video statement released by Reform UK, he said the by-election would allow constituents to "stick two fingers up at the entire establishment".

Major parties refuse to contest vote

Labour, the Conservatives, the Liberal Democrats and Restore Britain have all said they will not field candidates in the by-election, effectively boycotting the contest.

A Labour spokesperson said the party would not "indulge" Farage by taking part in what it described as "this circus".

Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch dismissed the move as a "gimmick", arguing Farage was attempting to distract attention from the allegations surrounding his finances. She said the Conservatives would instead contest any "real by-election" that might result from the standards investigation.

Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey urged the government to delay Farage's resignation until the standards commissioner completed the investigation. He added that if the by-election proceeds, other parties should continue refusing to participate in what he described as Farage's "vanity project".

Restore Britain leader Rupert Lowe also ruled out standing a candidate, although he said his party would contest any future by-election triggered by the outcome of the standards investigation. The Green Party said the decision on whether to stand would be made by its local Clacton branch.

Investigations and financial support

Farage's resignation will suspend the standards commissioner's investigation into the £5 million gift until he returns to Parliament, should he win the by-election.

The inquiry began in May after questions were raised over his failure to declare the donation from Christopher Harborne, a Thailand-based British cryptocurrency investor and one of Reform UK's largest financial backers. Harborne has donated £15 million to the party since the beginning of last year.

Farage has said the £5 million was an unconditional gift intended to help fund his personal security.

His team has also argued that non-cash support reportedly provided by longtime associate George Cottrell, including funding staff for security and social media work and access to accommodation near Buckingham Palace, did not require registration.

The allegations emerged after a Sunday Times report examined Farage's links to Cottrell, who served eight months in a US prison after pleading guilty to wire fraud in 2017.

Farage said he had spent the weekend considering his future after media coverage involving his family and Cottrell.

Rules and next steps

Parliament requires newly elected MPs to declare gifts or benefits connected with their parliamentary or political activities that were received in the 12 months before their election, although purely personal gifts are exempt.

Farage insisted he had complied with the law.

"Let me be absolutely clear: I have done nothing wrong. I have not broken the law in any way at all. I have not misused public money," he said.

If the standards investigation eventually concludes that Farage should be suspended, a recall petition could be triggered. If at least 10% of eligible voters sign the petition, another by-election would be held.

Farage won the Clacton seat at the 2024 general election with a majority of 8,405 over the Conservatives after seven previous unsuccessful attempts to enter Parliament.

His resignation will take effect only after he accepts a Crown appointment, the formal mechanism used to disqualify MPs from the House of Commons.

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png

Already a member? haveyr-say.png


image.png
Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 8 July 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member
9 hours ago, RayC said:

Dear, oh dear. In your feeble attempt to justify your untenable position you now resort, once again, to out-and-out lying: Where have I " ... generalise(d) and extend(ed my) self hatred to the whole white race"? That's right, I haven't.

I don't loath myself, Jonny. In fact, I quite like myself, so maybe I am guilty of being a narcissist. But a self-loather and racist? No, not me.

Let's remind ourselves what this is all about. You stated that:

  • Most of the English (football) team are not English

  • Black people are not English.

I don't doubt that the overwhelming majority of people who read your posts reached the same conclusion as me long ago: You are a racist. The difference this time is that rather than hide behind snide, sarcky comments such as, "Diversity is our strength", and then plead innocence suggesting that this could not be possibly be interpreted as racist, this time you're let your guard down and made two explicitly racist statements.

And before you claim otherwise, it is difficult to think of a situation where the above bulletted sentences could be taken out of context: They are racist in nature which makes the person who made them a racist.

Own the label or disown the statements.

You support DEI Raymond.

DEI supports unequal opportunities based on race. It's pretty much the definition of racism. You support it hence you are a racist. It's quite simple.

English is an ethnicity. That is a fact. Black people are not ethnically English. That is also a fact. It might be a fact that does not fit with your world view. But it remains a fact. Stating facts is not racist (unlike promoting DEI, which is).

image.png

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member
7 hours ago, josephbloggs said:


Friday , 7th July, 2026. The day that Jonny finally, and officially, completely lost the plot.

Consumed with hatred, the rot has overtaken the brain completely, it is beyond ridiculous now, I think it must be a parody account and we've all been strung along.

"You're mental" does not add value to this debate, Joseph. Weak attempts at personal insults do not advance the conversation.

If you have a substantive point to make, please share it. Otherwise, well... you know... 😄

RayC Ruby Member

RayC

Advanced Member
6 hours ago, JonnyF said:

You support DEI Raymond.

DEI supports unequal opportunities based on race. It's pretty much the definition of racism. You support it hence you are a racist. It's quite simple.

English is an ethnicity. That is a fact. Black people are not ethnically English. That is also a fact. It might be a fact that does not fit with your world view. But it remains a fact. Stating facts is not racist (unlike promoting DEI, which is).

image.png

Clutching at straws.

English may be an ethnicity but it is a theoretical one. As I pointed out previously, there are very few, if any, pure-blooded English people alive today. We are a bunch of mograls.

If you widen the definition to include anyone who might have Anglo-Saxon, Jute, etc blood then, at the very least, you allow for mixed-race individuals e.g. Jude Bellingham to be English.

DEI is an acronym that stands for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. It is an organizational framework designed to promote fair treatment, equal opportunities, and full participation for all people, particularly those from historically underrepresented or marginalized groups. (Source: Google)

Yes, Jonathan I support those goals, although I fully appreciate why a racist wouldn't.

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member
21 minutes ago, RayC said:

DEI is an acronym that stands for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. It is an organizational framework designed to promote fair treatment, equal opportunities, and full participation for all people, particularly those from historically underrepresented or marginalized groups. (Source: Google)

Yes, Jonathan I support those goals, although I fully appreciate why a racist wouldn't.

How is denying opportunities for people because of their race (white) promoting equal opportunities?

By giving preference to certain races (black/brown) they deny the opportunity for those of other races. It's racist, and you support it.

At least own your racism Raymond. You're always looking for it. It's closer than you think.

Tourist2 Silver Member

Tourist2

Advanced Member
(edited)

Edited by Tourist2

RayC Ruby Member

RayC

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, JonnyF said:

How is denying opportunities for people because of their race (white) promoting equal opportunities?

By giving preference to certain races (black/brown) they deny the opportunity for those of other races. It's racist, and you support it.

At least own your racism Raymond. You're always looking for it. It's closer than you think.

So "promot(ing) fair treatment, equal opportunities, and full participation for all people .." equates to 'denying opportunities to white people'? I know that you like to redefine words and terminology but that's a stretch even for you.

Unfortunately, I don't have to look very far or hard for examples of racism, Jonny. You supply more than enough material on a daily basis.

Out of the pair of us, there is only one racist and it's not me.

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, RayC said:

So "promot(ing) fair treatment, equal opportunities, and full participation for all people .." equates to 'denying opportunities to white people'? I know that you like to redefine words and terminology but that's a stretch even for you.

Unfortunately, I don't have to look very far or hard for examples of racism, Jonny. You supply more than enough material on a daily basis.

Out of the pair of us, there is only one racist and it's not me.

You are not promoting fair treatment.

You are promoting whites being excluded from certain opportunities, you racist.

When jobs are only available to ethnic minorities i.e. non whites, that is racist and you support it, you racist

Own your racism Raymond. It's the only way you can improve yourself.

RayC Ruby Member

RayC

Advanced Member
5 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

You are not promoting fair treatment.

You are promoting whites being excluded from certain opportunities, you racist.

When jobs are only available to ethnic minorities i.e. non whites, that is racist and you support it, you racist

Own your racism Raymond. It's the only way you can improve yourself.

More lies. Where are these supposed posts of mine? Put up or shut up.

Your attempts to deflect attention away from your own explicit racism are pitiful.

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member
1 minute ago, RayC said:

More lies. Where are these supposed posts of mine? Put up or shut up.

Your attempts to deflect attention away from your own explicit racism are pitiful.

So you do not support racist DEI policies any more? Have you acknowledged the error of your historic racism and changed path?

Or are you denying you ever supported this racist initiative?

Which is it Raymond? Do tell...

RayC Ruby Member

RayC

Advanced Member
13 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

So you do not support racist DEI policies any more? Have you acknowledged the error of your historic racism and changed path?

Or are you denying you ever supported this racist initiative?

Which is it Raymond? Do tell...

You really have no shame. Another pathetic attempt to divert attention away from your own racism.

I told you that what I support i.e. "the (promotion of) fair treatment, equal opportunities, and full participation for all people, particularly those from historically underrepresented or marginalized groups". I am sure that within that framework, there will be policies which I support and those which I don't.

Not everything is 'black and white' and not everything results in a conflict between 'blacks and whites' no matter how hard you try to imply and infer that it does.

Btw. Do you accept that the number of living, pure-blooded ethnic Englishmen is infinitesimally small and that to all extents and purposes, the concept is effectively theoretical? (A 'No' in either case will require explanation. You don't get away with peddling your pseudo-academic racism that easily).

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member
35 minutes ago, RayC said:

You really have no shame. Another pathetic attempt to divert attention away from your own racism.

I told you that what I support i.e. "the (promotion of) fair treatment, equal opportunities, and full participation for all people, particularly those from historically underrepresented or marginalized groups". I am sure that within that framework, there will be policies which I support and those which I don't.

Not everything is 'black and white' and not everything results in a conflict between 'blacks and whites' no matter how hard you try to imply and infer that it does.

Btw. Do you accept that the number of living, pure-blooded ethnic Englishmen is infinitesimally small and that to all extents and purposes, the concept is effectively theoretical? (A 'No' in either case will require explanation. You don't get away with peddling your pseudo-academic racism that easily).

Racist Ray trying to justify his support of reduced opportunities for indigenous young Brits in their homeland. The homeland their forefathers died in battle to protect.

As disgusting as it is pathetic.

RayC Ruby Member

RayC

Advanced Member
11 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Racist Ray trying to justify his support of reduced opportunities for indigenous young Brits in their homeland. The homeland their forefathers died in battle to protect.

As disgusting as it is pathetic.

Oh, look .... Having tried and failed miserably and repeatedly to justify his odious remarks, the self-identified racist now plays the sentimental card and tries to present himself as protector of the UK's heroic legacy: Doesn't work, John boy. My father fought in Burma alongside Gurkhas and Indians and he and his comrades would have no truck with your racist rhetoric.

You really do have a problem with both veracity and logical deduction, don't you? Where have I supported reducing opportunities for 'indigenous' young Brits? Once again, that's right; I haven't. Yet another lie to add your collection.

Now about my question (reproduced below for ease of reference). Maybe you could try answering it?

_-------------++++++++

"Do you accept that the number of living, pure-blooded ethnic Englishmen is infinitesimally small and that to all extents and purposes, the concept is effectively theoretical? (A 'No' in either case will require explanation. You don't get away with peddling your pseudo-academic racism that easily).

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member
11 hours ago, RayC said:

Oh, look .... Having tried and failed miserably and repeatedly to justify his odious remarks, the self-identified racist now plays the sentimental card and tries to present himself as protector of the UK's heroic legacy: Doesn't work, John boy. My father fought in Burma alongside Gurkhas and Indians and he and his comrades would have no truck with your racist rhetoric.

You really do have a problem with both veracity and logical deduction, don't you? Where have I supported reducing opportunities for 'indigenous' young Brits? Once again, that's right; I haven't. Yet another lie to add your collection.

Now about my question (reproduced below for ease of reference). Maybe you could try answering it?

_-------------++++++++

"Do you accept that the number of living, pure-blooded ethnic Englishmen is infinitesimally small and that to all extents and purposes, the concept is effectively theoretical? (A 'No' in either case will require explanation. You don't get away with peddling your pseudo-academic racism that easily).

Your attempts to deflect from your own racist support of DEI anti white discrimination is increasingly tedious.

As are your attempts at Ethnocide and Ethnic erasure regarding the Ethnically English.

Racist Ray really has been exposed. He's finally found all that racism he's been looking for. 😄

RayC Ruby Member

RayC

Advanced Member
7 hours ago, JonnyF said:

Your attempts to deflect from your own racist support of DEI anti white discrimination is increasingly tedious.

As are your attempts at Ethnocide and Ethnic erasure regarding the Ethnically English.

Racist Ray really has been exposed. He's finally found all that racism he's been looking for. 😄

Third or fourth time - I'm losing count - of asking:

"Do you accept that the number of living, pure-blooded ethnic Englishmen is infinitesimally small and that to all extents and purposes, the concept is effectively theoretical? (A 'No' in either case will require explanation. You don't get away with peddling your pseudo-academic racism that easily)"

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.