Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

Farage’s £5m Gift From Thailand-Based Donor to Be Probed

Nigel Farage has said a £5m gift from a billionaire supporter was intended as a reward for his long-running campaign in favour of Brexit, as questions continue over whether the payment should have been declared after he entered Parliament.

Get today's headlines by email image.png

The leader of Reform UK told The Sun that the money, provided by donor Christopher Harborne, was given on a “completely unconditional basis” and did not influence his return to politics.

The payment is now under scrutiny after critics argued it should have been disclosed when Nigel Farage was elected as MP for Clacton in 2024.

Gift linked to Brexit campaigning

Farage said the donation reflected appreciation for his decades-long involvement in the campaign that led to the UK leaving the European Union.

“It’s very unusual for someone to give up 27 years of their life to campaign for something,” he said, adding that the gift was provided without conditions.

According to Farage, the money was “given as a reward for campaigning for Brexit for 27 years”.

He also rejected suggestions that the payment influenced his political decisions.

Asked whether the donation affected his return to public life, he said it had not, adding: “I cannot be bought by anybody.”

Investigation into declaration rules

The UK Parliament’s standards watchdog has opened an inquiry to determine whether Farage breached Commons rules by not registering the payment.

Under parliamentary guidelines, MPs must declare financial interests and certain benefits received in the year before they are elected within one month of entering Parliament.

Farage has previously argued that he had no obligation to register the payment. He said the gift was made before he became an MP and was intended to fund his personal security rather than political activity.

Rules governing MPs’ conduct state that purely personal gifts or benefits — including family gifts or commercial loans — would not normally require registration. However, they also say that both the donor’s motives and the intended use of a gift should be considered. If there is uncertainty, MPs are advised to register the benefit.

If an investigation finds that the code of conduct has been breached, sanctions can range from a written or oral apology to suspension from the House of Commons or, in serious cases, expulsion.

Political criticism and donor response

Opposition parties have said Farage must clarify the circumstances surrounding the payment.

Both the Conservative Party and the Labour Party have raised concerns about the donation, with the Conservatives writing to the parliamentary standards commissioner and the Electoral Commission to request further scrutiny.

Harborne, a British cryptocurrency investor based in Bangkok, has previously defended the gift. In comments reported by The Telegraph in April, he said he did not expect anything in return beyond helping ensure Farage’s safety.

Harborne also said the donation reflected his admiration for Farage’s efforts over many years to achieve Brexit.

The businessman has been a major financial backer of Reform UK. Last year he gave the party £9m in a single donation, the largest ever contribution to a UK political party from a living individual.

In total, Harborne provided £12m to Reform UK in 2025 and has previously donated to the Conservative Party.

Sources within Reform say the separate £5m payment to Farage was made in early 2024, before he had decided to stand as a parliamentary candidate.

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png

Already a member? haveyr-say.png


image.png
Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 15 May 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

scubascuba3 Star Member

scubascuba3

Advanced Member

He says spending the £5m on security and he needs it with all the crazy lefties. The lefties will be desperate to find dirt on Reform especially Farage.

His security should be paid for by the govt

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member

The left are getting worried.

First they said he wasn't a serious threat. Now they're going all guns blazing to find something on him 😃 Panicking.

You'd think they might have learnt something after the Brexit vote but instead they focused on insulting the electorate and then called for another vote because they didnt like the last one.

Maybe they can rerun the next general election when Farage wins? Might be their only hope.

I swear the left get more deranged with each passing year.

baansgr Platinum Member

baansgr

Advanced Member

Isn't today's politics rubbish...

josephbloggs Diamond Member

josephbloggs

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, JonnyF said:

The left are getting worried.

First they said he wasn't a serious threat. Now they're going all guns blazing to find something on him 😃 Panicking.

You'd think they might have learnt something after the Brexit vote but instead they focused on insulting the electorate and then called for another vote because they didnt like the last one.

Maybe they can rerun the next general election when Farage wins? Might be their only hope.

I swear the left get more deranged with each passing year.

Ah, so it's the left's fault. Got it.

Nothing to do with the grifter taking millions from a crypto billionaire when he has pledged to slash taxes and duties on crypto transactions if he becomes PM. Nothing to do with him not declaring a £5m "gift". Nothing to do with him lying about it and playing the victim when found out by saying it's for his security as - waah waah waah - he can't live a normal life. And nothing to do with him then changing his mind (because it's easy to check and find out it wasn't spent on security but on a house) and saying it was a reward for Brexit.

Yeah, all the nasty left.

He's bent as a two bob note, always has been, and now it is finally catching up with him. Nasty lefties.

CallumWK Diamond Member

CallumWK

Advanced Member
4 hours ago, scubascuba3 said:

The lefties will be desperate to find dirt on Reform especially Farage.

I'm sure that will be an easy task

Chomper Higgot Star Member

Chomper Higgot

Advanced Member

Voted for and defended by people who have no hope of ever making £5 million in the whole of their working life.

Emdog Platinum Member

Emdog

Advanced Member

"...the money, provided by donor Christopher Harborne, was given on a “completely unconditional basis”"

No such thing as a 'free lunch'

stevenl Star Member

stevenl

Advanced Member

Of course it should have been declared. But nothing will come of it, the rules here are not very clear and leave a lot of room for interpretation.

scubascuba3 Star Member

scubascuba3

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, CallumWK said:

I'm sure that will be an easy task

More dirt on the lefties. He needs money for security because of the rabid lefties

josephbloggs Diamond Member

josephbloggs

Advanced Member
37 minutes ago, scubascuba3 said:

More dirt on the lefties. He needs money for security because of the rabid lefties


It wasn't for security. He didn't spend it on security. He keeps changing his mind on what it was for.

We all know what it was for.

Chomper Higgot Star Member

Chomper Higgot

Advanced Member
56 minutes ago, scubascuba3 said:

More dirt on the lefties. He needs money for security because of the rabid lefties

So he’ll have the receipts?!

klaikangwon Senior Member

klaikangwon

Member

It's gift given to man who was just private citizen with no public office at time? How can it possibly be illegal or need to be declared? Does Sir Starmer declare every payment he received in 45 years before Parliament, or does Sir Blair declare every of huge payments received after leaving office ?

"Christopher Harborne" (legal name: Chakrit Sakunkrit) also, is long time public Brexit supporter, so while reason may sound invented, actually quite plausible. It not a lot of money for him to a man who really did deliver thing he cares about.

stevenl Star Member

stevenl

Advanced Member
14 minutes ago, klaikangwon said:

It's gift given to man who was just private citizen with no public office at time? How can it possibly be illegal or need to be declared? Does Sir Starmer declare every payment he received in 45 years before Parliament, or does Sir Blair declare every of huge payments received after leaving office ?

"Christopher Harborne" (legal name: Chakrit Sakunkrit) also, is long time public Brexit supporter, so while reason may sound invented, actually quite plausible. It not a lot of money for him to a man who really did deliver thing he cares about.

Time for you to read the OP for the declaration requirements.

josephbloggs Diamond Member

josephbloggs

Advanced Member
11 minutes ago, klaikangwon said:

It's gift given to man who was just private citizen with no public office at time? How can it possibly be illegal or need to be declared? Does Sir Starmer declare every payment he received in 45 years before Parliament, or does Sir Blair declare every of huge payments received after leaving office ?

"Christopher Harborne" (legal name: Chakrit Sakunkrit) also, is long time public Brexit supporter, so while reason may sound invented, actually quite plausible. It not a lot of money for him to a man who really did deliver thing he cares about.

No excuses for him. Read the rules:

https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201516/cmcode/1076/107604.htm

Especially this one:

The House requires new Members, within one month of their election, to register all their current financial interests, and any registrable benefits (other than earnings) received in the 12 months before their election.

So no, Keir Starmer would not have had to declare every payment he ever received in 45 years before Parliament. Nor does Blair have to declare his earnings after leaving parliament. What ridiculous comparisons.

However, if Blair became an MP again he would have to declare his interests, donations, and benefits from the prior 12 months.

scubascuba3 Star Member

scubascuba3

Advanced Member
49 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:


It wasn't for security. He didn't spend it on security. He keeps changing his mind on what it was for.

We all know what it was for.

No he doesn't keep changing his mind, he doesn't have to spend it on security all in year 1, that's obvious

Summerinsiam Advanced Member

Summerinsiam

Member
3 hours ago, JonnyF said:

The left are getting worried.

First they said he wasn't a serious threat. Now they're going all guns blazing to find something on him 😃 Panicking.

You'd think they might have learnt something after the Brexit vote but instead they focused on insulting the electorate and then called for another vote because they didnt like the last one.

Maybe they can rerun the next general election when Farage wins? Might be their only hope.

I swear the left get more deranged with each passing year.

But, but Starmer.........

scubascuba3 Star Member

scubascuba3

Advanced Member
32 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

So he’ll have the receipts?!

of course, he's paying for loads of security

josephbloggs Diamond Member

josephbloggs

Advanced Member
18 minutes ago, scubascuba3 said:

No he doesn't keep changing his mind, he doesn't have to spend it on security all in year 1, that's obvious


Er, he does keep changing his mind. First of all he said it was purely for his security. Then when he realised that people knew he paid for a £1.4m house in cash shortly after he said it was an unconditional gift, ie not just for security. And come on, an "unconditional gift" from a crypto billionaire to someone who has said he would cut taxes and duties of crypto transactions if he becomes PM. Come on Scuba, surely no one can be that naive.

He changed his mind. Every time he gets caught in a lie he changes his mind, changes his answers.

I am sure he appreciates that he has blind loyalists like you that will try to defend the indefensible though and even go to the lengths of backing his lies based on zero evidence. Nice.

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member
3 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Voted for and defended by people who have no hope of ever making £5 million in the whole of their working life.

Just like Starmer voters aren't worth 10 million quid with free access to covent garden penthouses amongst other freebies like arsenal corporate boxes, taylor swift tickets and designer clothes.

johnnybangkok Platinum Member

johnnybangkok

Advanced Member
37 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

No excuses for him. Read the rules:

https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201516/cmcode/1076/107604.htm

Especially this one:

The House requires new Members, within one month of their election, to register all their current financial interests, and any registrable benefits (other than earnings) received in the 12 months before their election.

So no, Keir Starmer would not have had to declare every payment he ever received in 45 years before Parliament. Nor does Blair have to declare his earnings after leaving parliament. What ridiculous comparisons.

However, if Blair became an MP again he would have to declare his interests, donations, and benefits from the prior 12 months.

Ahhh the facts - like holy water to vampires with the Farage fan brigade!

The rules (as you quite rightly stated) are VERY clear 'Parliamentary rules state that any benefits should be declared for the 12 months before taking up office as an MP, depending on whether it was for political or personal purposes. The rules state: “If there is any doubt, the benefit should be registered.”

Farage is rightly being held accountable for what is a VERY obvious bribe as Farage had stated he did not intend to stand as a prospective MP but U-turned in June 2024, within weeks of receiving the money from Harbourne. He then obviously kept shtoom about it and keeps changing his mind about what it was for now that's he's been rumbled.

If the Standards Commissioner/Committee conclude that Farage committed a serious breach, he could face sanctions ranging from an apology to a formal suspension from the House of Commons .

I say throw the book at the swindling, dishonest weasel and get him barred!

klaikangwon Senior Member

klaikangwon

Member

As this big family of Thailand expats, and of whom from UK... has anyone here met Chakrit Sakunkrit in Bangkok... at Mandarin Oriental, or Soi Cowboy perhaps...?

Can get job with this very rich man?

scubascuba3 Star Member

scubascuba3

Advanced Member
7 minutes ago, johnnybangkok said:

Ahhh the facts - like holy water to vampires with the Farage fan brigade!

The rules (as you quite rightly stated) are VERY clear 'Parliamentary rules state that any benefits should be declared for the 12 months before taking up office as an MP, depending on whether it was for political or personal purposes. The rules state: “If there is any doubt, the benefit should be registered.”

Farage is rightly being held accountable for what is a VERY obvious bribe as Farage had stated he did not intend to stand as a prospective MP but U-turned in June 2024, within weeks of receiving the money from Harbourne. He then obviously kept shtoom about it and keeps changing his mind about what it was for now that's he's been rumbled.

If the Standards Commissioner/Committee conclude that Farage committed a serious breach, he could face sanctions ranging from an apology to a formal suspension from the House of Commons .

I say throw the book at the swindling, dishonest weasel and get him barred!

This will blow over very soon and in even better news, Starmer will be gone, what a useless PM he was, worse ever, only one possibly worse will be Rayner

Pasak110 Explorer Member

Pasak110

Member

Starmer gets a few free suits and the media and right wing nut jobs are frothing...... and today it turns out Farage bought a new property for cash, over a million spon doolies....... the parliamentary watch dogs are on to him....

scubascuba3 Star Member

scubascuba3

Advanced Member
4 minutes ago, Pasak110 said:

Starmer gets a few free suits and the media and right wing nut jobs are frothing...... and today it turns out Farage bought a new property for cash, over a million spon doolies....... the parliamentary watch dogs are on to him....

£1.5m must be nothing to Farage, i guarantee he had that money already, you lefties hate people with money unless they've sponged it from somewhere

klaikangwon Senior Member

klaikangwon

Member
30 minutes ago, Pasak110 said:

Starmer gets a few free suits and the media and right wing nut jobs are frothing...... and today it turns out Farage bought a new property for cash, over a million spon doolies....... the parliamentary watch dogs are on to him....

It does make some sense.

Ll leader scan be bribed finally, maybe only with something truly huge, like new province or giant plane. But when your leader bribed by nice pair of shiny shoes you have wonder, is this rich and important corrupt country or just corrupt lemonade stall ?

johnnybangkok Platinum Member

johnnybangkok

Advanced Member
36 minutes ago, scubascuba3 said:

36 minutes ago, scubascuba3 said:

36 minutes ago, scubascuba3 said:

This will blow over very soon and in even better news, Starmer will be gone, what a useless PM he was, worse ever, only one possibly worse will be Rayner

So you HOPE it will blow over because he's 'your man' regardles of the illegality of it all? You are quite ok with a potential PM being bribed by individuals who have an agenda of their own and which are against the UK population?

Pretty much tells us all we need to know about you and your ilk.

unblocktheplanet Diamond Member

unblocktheplanet

Advanced Member

As I read this article, I don't take it that Chakrit's gift was for personal security but for longer-term financial security. Did Starmer become an MP 12 months orss after. If so, he would have to declare. So what? All pols everywhere are unusually rich, the trough is full.

The dirty part in this story is not Starmer. It's the fact that Chakrit was able to give an enormous donation to a political party in a foreign country. Does Chakrit have dual UK citizenship?

I'm not so cognizant of UK politics. Do they have craven lobbyists for big interests as in the US? Is there no mechanism for curbs on political donations?

P.S. Will someone please pass Chakrit my address? He might like some of my causes.

klaikangwon Senior Member

klaikangwon

Member
Just now, johnnybangkok said:

So you HOPE it will blow over because he's 'your man' regardles of the illegality of it all? You are quite ok with a potential PM being bribed by individuals who have an agenda of their own and which are against the UK population?

"Agenda of own against UK population" appears to be being borderline British nationalist ...?

Of course some people disagree with that agenda, even if they have the UK passport, but how is it "private agenda against UK"? It is opposite by definition...?

johnnybangkok Platinum Member

johnnybangkok

Advanced Member
31 minutes ago, scubascuba3 said:

£1.5m must be nothing to Farage, i guarantee he had that money already, you lefties hate people with money unless they've sponged it from somewhere

Yeah it's 'nothing' when you are being bribed with £5,000,000

johnnybangkok Platinum Member

johnnybangkok

Advanced Member
1 minute ago, klaikangwon said:

"Agenda of own against UK population" appears to be being borderline British nationalist ...?

Of course some people disagree with that agenda, even if they have the UK passport, but how is it "private agenda against UK"? It is opposite by definition...?

I'm guessing that English isn't your first language but I genuinely have no idea what your posts are about. Run them through Chat GPT before posting perhaps?

And my whole post was 'an agenda of their own and which are against the UK population' - which means something completely different to what you are trying to infer.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.