Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

FCC orders review of Disney licences after Jimmy Kimmel joke

The US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has ordered an early review of television broadcast licences held by stations operated by The Walt Disney Company following remarks by late-night host Jimmy Kimmel about Melania Trump.

Get today's headlines by email image.png

The move comes days after US President Donald Trump publicly urged ABC — owned by Disney — to remove Kimmel from the air over a joke made shortly before a shooting incident at a Washington gala attended by the president and first lady.

The FCC said on Tuesday it had already been examining Disney’s ABC stations for possible regulatory breaches, including allegations of unlawful discrimination.

A spokesperson for Disney told the BBC that ABC and its affiliated stations operate within FCC guidelines and serve the public interest.

Joke sparks political backlash

The controversy centres on a comment Kimmel made about Melania Trump during his late-night programme. The comedian said the first lady had the glow of an “expectant widow”.

The remark was made days before a gunman opened fire near a security checkpoint at a gala attended by the Trumps.

President Trump criticised the joke earlier this week, describing it as a “call to violence”. Melania Trump also condemned the comments, saying they contributed to what she called “the political sickness within America”.

Kimmel rejected the accusation, saying his remarks were not intended to encourage violence.

“I’ve been very vocal for many years speaking out against gun violence in particular,” he said.

Shooting at Washington gala

The dispute follows a security incident at the annual White House Correspondents' Dinner held at the Washington Hilton on Saturday night.

Authorities said a suspect, identified as 31-year-old Cole Tomas Allen, fired shots near a security checkpoint outside the venue.

The president and first lady were evacuated unharmed.

Officials said Allen was subdued by security personnel near a staircase leading to a ballroom where more than 2,000 guests — including journalists, government officials and public figures — had gathered.

He has since been charged with attempting to assassinate the president.

Rare regulatory step

Legal experts say the FCC’s decision to bring forward a review of Disney’s broadcast licences is unusual.

Jeffrey Schneider, a professor at the USC Gould School of Law, said early licence reviews have occurred before but typically involve technical failures or fraudulent conduct.

He said the threshold for revoking broadcast licences is high, requiring regulators to demonstrate “intentional and repeated violations” of federal rules.

Schneider said it was unlikely that Disney would ultimately lose its licences, noting the burden of proof lies with the regulator.

Previous tensions

Kimmel has previously faced backlash for political remarks made on his programme.

Last September he was temporarily taken off air after comments about the killing of conservative influencer Charlie Kirk. During a monologue, Kimmel said supporters of Trump — whom he referred to as the “Maga gang” — were attempting to use the killing to gain political advantage.

His show returned to air a week later.

The FCC, established in 1934, regulates radio and television broadcasting in the United States. The agency oversees licensing of frequencies and enforces rules covering sponsorship disclosures, emergency broadcasts and standards related to obscenity and decency.

President Trump has previously suggested that television networks providing him with what he calls “bad publicity” should risk losing their licences, raising questions about how much authority the administration has over broadcasters.

Last year, FCC chairman Brendan Carr notified Disney that regulators were investigating the company’s diversity and inclusion programmes amid concerns they might conflict with federal regulations.

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png

Already a member? haveyr-say.png


image.png
Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 29 April 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

NanLaew Star Member

NanLaew

Advanced Member
On 4/29/2026 at 9:32 AM, JonnyF said:

If that's what I thought, that is what I would have said.

Unlike you I am consistent on the issue of free speech.

So you ARE a closet lefty after all.

Thought so.

cjinchiangrai Platinum Member

cjinchiangrai

Advanced Member
On 4/29/2026 at 3:06 PM, BusyB said:

I think more like at least another generation - the fungus has been filtering through the whole system since 9-11.

You won't sort that mess out overnight or in 20 years. Trump is but a symptom of something much deeper and more widespread.

Since Reagan actually, the original MAGA moron.

BusyB Platinum Member

BusyB

Advanced Member
11 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

Since Reagan actually, the original MAGA moron.

Yeah, I agree. He was the starter culture no doubt. With the 'Moral Majority'.

BusyB Platinum Member

BusyB

Advanced Member
On 4/29/2026 at 10:51 AM, Smokey and the Bandit said:

The "expectant widow" joke isn't just a failure of humor; it’s a catastrophic collapse of basic human decency.

The 'catastrophic collapse of basic human decency' has been elected into the White House with all that that entails by 77 million Americans who all seem to have had a collective collapse in basic decency and human morality.

wil iam not Gold Member

wil iam not

Advanced Member
On 4/30/2026 at 4:22 PM, Yellowtail said:

Why should Jimmy Kimmel have the right to spew his hate at me in my home? Let him do it online or on cable.

Still getting your TV via an antenna then?

Are there not buttons on your remote, assuming you have one, to change channels or turn volume down?

Rams86 Gold Member

Rams86

Advanced Member

Trump started using profanities against others in the first place. He's not very smart as all he has to do is to ignore the comments about him that he doesn't like. Instead he gets his tits in a tangle and wants sue guys like Kimmel.

earlinclaifornia Platinum Member

earlinclaifornia

Advanced Member

The latest for our First Lady is concerning:

newnative Diamond Member

newnative

Advanced Member
5 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Are you saying now that raising taxes could reduce revenue? It has to be one or the other.

In any event, why should one taxpayer pay a greater percentage than another taxpayer? What is fair about that?

Taxes .jpg

5 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Are you saying now that raising taxes could reduce revenue? It has to be one or the other.

In any event, why should one taxpayer pay a greater percentage than another taxpayer? What is fair about that?

Taxes .jpg

So, you couldn't find the quote. Thought so, since I never said it. See my previous post for the already stated scenario where raising a tax rate a ridiculous amount, such as 100%, could ultimately result in less tax collected.

We're not going to agree on progressive tax systems. I think it's fair for those earning more to pay a bigger percentage in taxes, you apparently don't. What makes it fair, for me, is they can afford to pay a larger percentage, while others can't. That's just basic fairness. Most developed nations agree and have progressive tax systems, including nearly all of the 38 OECD member countries.

newnative Diamond Member

newnative

Advanced Member
7 hours ago, TedG said:

How about cutting some federal spending?

Sure--I'd start with ICE.

Rams86 Gold Member

Rams86

Advanced Member

Trump started using profanities against others in the first place. He's not very smart as all he has to do is to ignore the comments about him that he doesn't like. Instead he gets his tits in a tangle and wants sue guys like Kimmel.

Rams86 Gold Member

Rams86

Advanced Member

Keep up the good work Jimmy, you're a legend.

cdemundo Platinum Member

cdemundo

Advanced Member

So what was the Kimmel joke again?

Rams86 Gold Member

Rams86

Advanced Member
3 minutes ago, cdemundo said:

So what was the Kimmel joke again?

Didn't our Donnies parents teach him when he was a kid " sticks and stones may break my bones but saying bad things doesn't hurt me."

TedG Ruby Member

TedG

Advanced Member
38 minutes ago, newnative said:

Sure--I'd start with ICE.

Why?

newnative Diamond Member

newnative

Advanced Member
13 hours ago, TedG said:

Why?

Because ICE is spending like an out-of-control drunken sailor, with a budget that's far more than it needs. It's budget has grown form around 6 billion in 2016 to a proposed 72 to 85 billion to fund it through 2029. In 2016, some 331,000 illegals were rounded up and deported. For 2025, around 540,000. An increase, yes, but not warranting 72 to 85 billion dollars. ICE, by the way, is now the highest-funded federal law enforcement agency. Some examples from Google, likely there are plenty of other ones, including the purchase of 6 Boeing 737s not mentioned below:

  • Property Acquisition for Detention Expansion (2026): In early 2026, ICE purchased several large warehouses to convert into detention facilities, including over $100 million for a site in Hagerstown, Maryland, more than $70 million for a site in Surprise, Arizona, and $87 million for a facility in Pennsylvania. [1]

  • Surveillance Data Purchasing (2008–2021): ICE spent approximately \(\$2.8\) billion on surveillance, data collection, and data-sharing programs, including purchasing information from private companies. [1]

  • "Wartime Recruitment" Strategy (2026): The agency planned to spend \(\$100\) million to recruit personnel through online influencers and geo-targeted ad campaigns. [1]

  • Transfer of FEMA Funds (2018–2025): To cover budget shortfalls, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) repeatedly transferred funds from other departments, including \(\$10\) million from FEMA in FY2018 and over \(\$400\) million in 2023. [1, 2]

  • Detention Bed Overcapacity (2025): While Congress approved funding for 41,500 detention beds, ICE was found to be operating with nearly 50,000 to over 55,000 beds, incurring, in some instances, an additional \(\$500\) million annual cost without direct approval. [1, 2]

  • Overpriced Vehicle Procurement (2026): Reports indicated that DHS wasted millions on a fleet of high-priced, "unwanted" ICE-branded SUVs. [1]

  • Misuse of Funds for Foreign Operations (2020): ICE agents in Guatemala misused State Department funding to rent unmarked vans and pay local drivers to transport migrants, violating existing agreements. [1]

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
On 5/6/2026 at 5:31 PM, newnative said:

So, you couldn't find the quote. Thought so, since I never said it. See my previous post for the already stated scenario where raising a tax rate a ridiculous amount, such as 100%, could ultimately result in less tax collected.

We're not going to agree on progressive tax systems. I think it's fair for those earning more to pay a bigger percentage in taxes, you apparently don't. What makes it fair, for me, is they can afford to pay a larger percentage, while others can't. That's just basic fairness. Most developed nations agree and have progressive tax systems, including nearly all of the 38 OECD member countries.

How is it basic fairness? And fair to who?

If one person can afford to pay more for cheeseburger than another, it is fair to charge them more?

newnative Diamond Member

newnative

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

How is it basic fairness? And fair to who?

If one person can afford to pay more for cheeseburger than another, it is fair to charge them more?

Here you go, courtesy of Google:

A progressive tax system—where tax rates increase as income rises—is considered a matter of basic fairness primarily because it aligns with the ability-to-pay principle. This principle asserts that those with greater financial resources can afford to contribute a larger percentage of their income without sacrificing basic needs.

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
16 minutes ago, newnative said:

Here you go, courtesy of Google:

A progressive tax system—where tax rates increase as income rises—is considered a matter of basic fairness primarily because it aligns with the ability-to-pay principle. This principle asserts that those with greater financial resources can afford to contribute a larger percentage of their income without sacrificing basic needs.

If you don't know, just say you don't know.

How is the "ability-to-pay" principal fair, and who is it fair to?

Again, if one person can afford to pay more for cheeseburger than another, it is fair to charge them more?

Two guys work, go to the same school, live in the same town, have the same job, for the same pay. One guy blows all his money, the other saves, and they both retire at 65.

The guy that blows all his money gets subsidized housing, utilities and food stamps along with his Social Security.

The guy that saved, owns his home and it taxed on it, he's taxed on the money he saved, and his Social Security is taxed.

How is that fair?

JerryM Gold Member

JerryM

Advanced Member

NB The federal agency at issue here is the FCC NOT THE IRS:

ABC accuses Trump administration of violating free speech rights

The network accused the federal government of creating a “chilling effect on First Amendment-protected free speech” with a regulatory action focused on “The View.”

Updated May 9, 2026, 2:46 AM GMT+7

ABC this week accused the Trump administration of violating its free speech rights with a regulatory action focused on the talk show “The View,” according to a filing submitted to the Federal Communications Commission.

In the filing, the Disney-owned network blasted the federal government for creating a “chilling effect” on First Amendment freedoms with an investigation of whether “The View” broke a requirement that broadcast stations give equal time to political candidates for the same office.

The filing is Disney’s most pointed legal salvo against the Trump administration since the president returned to the White House last year and began sharply criticizing American broadcast networks over their on-air content.

https://www.nbcnews.com/business/media/abc-accuses-trump-administration-violating-free-speech-rights-rcna344247

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.